U.s.a. Visa Advice Shock

[notice]

Because of BIG (moderator) grovelling to now-grounded Gentil/NAC, (advertiser), as evidenced by the above closed advice topic on'Private Flying', how shocking that there is no co-ordination with the Wannabe colleague who recently posted:

Topic: USA Visas
scroggs
Moderator
posted 11th March 2003 13:23
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
USA Visas
The thread on US Visas has been removed pending a full and comprehensive review. We have been collating information from a number of sources, and when the revised post is complete it will be re-posted here.

I would like to point out that the removal of Richard Gentil's post is not a comment on the problems at NAC, nor is it a suggestion that his advice was wrong or invalid. We are trying to put together a post that will cover as many of your questions as possible, whatever flying you intend to do in the USA.

Please be patient while this post is prepared. In the meantime, please refer to this thread for a very useful discussion on the subject.

Scroggs
Virgin/Wannabes Moderator
[email protected]


[Last edited by scroggs on 13th March 2003 at 22:56]

Report this post to a moderator



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posts: 1240 | From: Essex, UK | Registered: Jan 1970 | Status: Offline | IP: Logged

[BRL]

notice. Firstly, who is groveling to who and I take it you mean the locked visa thread?

[PPRuNe Towers]

The new visa information is getting its final polish and i dotting from the relevant authorities and specialist attorneys. We also anxiously await any useful information from our prized contributor 'notice.'

While merely entertaining to those of us with more than 25 years flying experience the mealy mouthed, vicious in-fighting of many in the Floridian training industry cries caveat emptor to wannabees far louder than any editorialising we might contemplate.

We will however consider 'outing' the ID's of senior figures in training providers who persist in contributing invective rather than information.

Rob Lloyd