Idunno
21st Sep 2002, 00:44
The training section here seem to teach brand new cadets on the A321 fleet to retard thrust when the auto callout tells them to.
The problem with this is that the auto call is only there to remind you to close the thrust levers in an auto land in order to be ready to apply reverse thrust (the auto thrust has already commanded idle from the engines no matter what the lever position is).
Now most autolands are carried out as part of a CAT II or CAT III approach. In low vis situations the wind is likely to be near calm. Therefore the RETARD callout is generally appropriate.
However, in non CAT II/III conditions (no autoland) I would suggest that the RETARD autocall is in fact a nuisance call. Especially so in gusty conditions, and especially on long bodied a/c like the A321.
I have seen numerous events where the new f/o comes over threshold at the proper speed and height, gets to 30ft and hits a positive gust. The autocallout RETARD occurs just as he starts to balloon. He closes the thrust levers! The result is we are left 30ft off the ground with no power on and the inevitable negative shear then occurs. At this point the newbie realises whats coming next (heavy landing) and pulls back on the stick to arrest his descent rate. Result...probable tail strike!
We've already had one.
Why do trainers insist on teaching 'performance' landings to new guys on long bodied types? If landing on a limiting RWY I could understand the requirement to be right on the Vapp or VLS at touchdown, but then I'll probably want that landing myself in bad conditions!
But when landing on a 10,000ft runway would it not be more prudent to teach them to ignore the RETARD callout and keep a little power on into the flare? To fly it on, instead of this 'chop and yank' technique that they are shown?
Am I seriously mistaken?
Opinions welcome.
The problem with this is that the auto call is only there to remind you to close the thrust levers in an auto land in order to be ready to apply reverse thrust (the auto thrust has already commanded idle from the engines no matter what the lever position is).
Now most autolands are carried out as part of a CAT II or CAT III approach. In low vis situations the wind is likely to be near calm. Therefore the RETARD callout is generally appropriate.
However, in non CAT II/III conditions (no autoland) I would suggest that the RETARD autocall is in fact a nuisance call. Especially so in gusty conditions, and especially on long bodied a/c like the A321.
I have seen numerous events where the new f/o comes over threshold at the proper speed and height, gets to 30ft and hits a positive gust. The autocallout RETARD occurs just as he starts to balloon. He closes the thrust levers! The result is we are left 30ft off the ground with no power on and the inevitable negative shear then occurs. At this point the newbie realises whats coming next (heavy landing) and pulls back on the stick to arrest his descent rate. Result...probable tail strike!
We've already had one.
Why do trainers insist on teaching 'performance' landings to new guys on long bodied types? If landing on a limiting RWY I could understand the requirement to be right on the Vapp or VLS at touchdown, but then I'll probably want that landing myself in bad conditions!
But when landing on a 10,000ft runway would it not be more prudent to teach them to ignore the RETARD callout and keep a little power on into the flare? To fly it on, instead of this 'chop and yank' technique that they are shown?
Am I seriously mistaken?
Opinions welcome.