PDA

View Full Version : Time to role with it?


bighedsmallface
1st May 2015, 12:17
Given the increasing spread of illiteracy among all combat arms and the decreasing use of actual rolls of paper to record the participants of an event, is it time to move away from the 'nominal role[sic]' that retards keep writing and into the current, digital age?

Suggestions for alternatives?

Rossian
1st May 2015, 13:28
..... blithely referring to others as "retards" isn't going to win you any friends.

Also what exactly is it that you want to see happen? It isn't terribly clear from your message.

Do you want to go to text speak minus capitalisation and punctuation?

Do tell.

The Ancient Mariner

ShotOne
1st May 2015, 13:40
Quite, rossian. The "illiterate retards" mostly manage at least to get the message across, perhaps with imperfect grammar or spelling -but I'm really not sure what bighed wants to happen.

bighedsmallface
1st May 2015, 15:56
As ever, I am guilty of writing before checking that my comments would not offend. I sought to spark a discussion on this long out of date term which seems to (rightly) tax those who don't realise its origins.

It may also just have been the result of seeing it written wrongly for the seventh time this week.

melmothtw
1st May 2015, 16:15
As ever...

I'm not sure that 45 comments in 13 years warrants an 'as ever'.

bighedsmallface
2nd May 2015, 08:34
Methmol - you correctly assume that the only place I have expressed any opinion in that period is on this forum.

Rossian - I seek no new friends, simply enlightenment.

NutLoose
2nd May 2015, 08:49
The Age of Enlightenment (or simply the Enlightenment, or Age of Reason) is an era from the 1650s to the 1780s in which cultural and intellectual forces in Western Europe emphasized reason, analysis, and individualism rather than traditional lines of authority.

Age of Enlightenment - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_Enlightenment)

You're to late for enlightenment :ok:

StuartP
2nd May 2015, 08:53
If I understand you correctly, you want to eliminate the use of the word 'role' because no-one gets their list of assigned tasks* handed to them on a roll of paper anymore.

If you eliminate every word in English which has an archaic or obsolete origin but which nevertheless remains a perfectly good word there won't be a lot left.

* Oh hang on, that's Latin. Can't use that one either ...

Tankertrashnav
2nd May 2015, 09:03
"Nominal list", or even simpler "list of names" would seem to fit the bill as a suitable alternative.

My bête noire is "ex-pat" instead of expat. I have even seen "ex-patriot", as though the expatriate no longer felt any allegiance to their mother country (even though this is sometimes true!)

2nd May 2015, 09:18
StuartP - I think BHSF's post is about removing the term 'nominal roll' as so many numpties insist instead on writing 'nominal role' because they don't know the difference or because their spoolchicker recognises both words and won't correct them.

Possibly the same people who use pacific when they mean specific;)

glad rag
2nd May 2015, 11:03
Well that’s six minutes I won't be getting back....evah


:E

Mahogany_Bomber
3rd May 2015, 07:48
What exactly is your pacific issue?

Two's in
3rd May 2015, 15:06
nominal

/ˈnɒmɪnəl/

adjective


1. in name only; theoretical: the nominal leader


I have seen plenty of examples of nominal roles in the military.