PDA

View Full Version : Galileo setback


underfire
9th Sep 2014, 23:50
On August 22, 2014, at 9:27 am local time in French Guiana, a Soyuz ST rocket lifted off with the first two satellites in the Galileo constellation.

These are the first two satellites in a series of 22 FOC (Full Operational Capability) models built by prime contractor OHB System, with the payloads being supplied by SSTL (Surrey Satellite Technology Ltd, UK), a subsidiary of Airbus Defence and Space.

The liftoff and first part of the mission proceeded nominally, leading to release of the satellites according to the planned timetable, and reception of signals from the satellites. It was only a certain time after the separation of the satellites that the ongoing analysis of the data provided by the telemetry stations operated by the European Space Agency (ESA) and the French space agency CNES showed that the satellites were not in the expected orbit.

The targeted orbit was circular, inclined at 55 degrees with a semi major axis of 29,900 kilometers. The satellites are now in an elliptical orbit, with excentricity of 0.23, a semi major axis of 26,200 km and inclined at 49.8 degrees.

Both the Fregat upper stage and the two satellites are in a stable condition and position that entails absolutely no risk for people on the ground. The residual propellants on the Fregat stage have been purged and the stage was depressurized normally.

According to the initial analyses, an anomaly is thought to have occurred during the flight phase involving the Fregat upper stage, causing the satellites to be injected into a noncompliant orbit.

The first 2 satellites in the Galileo system are now considered space debris.

Amadis of Gaul
10th Sep 2014, 00:00
This was almost three weeks ago. Off-topic, too.

rjtjrt
10th Sep 2014, 00:18
Still is news that is worthy of discussion here.

Amadis of Gaul
10th Sep 2014, 02:16
This is an unmanned space vehicle forum now?

underfire
10th Sep 2014, 05:45
Those were the first 2 sats for the Galileo GPS system, that is why it is relevant.