PDA

View Full Version : The Embraer 190/195


Broomstick Flier
9th Sep 2011, 00:47
Good evening,

Recently I was invited to work for a local airline flying the E190/E195 duo as a first officer. My previous job was with bizjets, flying a Falcon 900 and more recently a CJ3.

I am still on ground school and the sim is about to begin in a couple of weeks (hopefully) and with this thread I am hoping to get some inside remarks from other fellow aviators flying the eJets, not only the somehow biased opinion of my company mates.

What are your general impressions of it, the operational "pitfalls", any tips or tricks worth to mention (yes, I know, I still have much to learn about it..) :ok:

I made a search but not many results...

Cheers
BF

TOFFAIR
9th Sep 2011, 01:44
Its a nice plane to fly, specially if it comes equiped with HUD. Flying bizjets the FMS may appear familiar to you, as it is a generic not compare to Airbus or Boeing. The vertical profile is very handy, just keep in mind it doesnt takes decelaration into account, specially approaching with tailwind try to stay a little below the green until configured on final. Side windows dont have heating or defog, flying in the moist tropics you may even open the window for taxi. Pressurization is a weak point in the construction, try to get an earlier decent or you will pop your ears and your Paxs as the Outflowvalve works harsh. Always keep an eye on the Bleeds, if pressure starts to vary a lot a failure might be imminent, not uncommon on the type, keep procedure for decompressure and emergency decent always in mind, specially if you should get dispached with 1 Pack Off, choose a lower Level, add fuel for a contingency, it do happen! Flaps are electric and therefore quite slow, and sensitive, using them to add drag in order to reduce speed is not a good idea. Low rate is slow rate, if you antecipate it configure early.
Should you fly both 190 and 195, handling is not so different as it is FbW, but I got used to flare earlier on the 195 compared to 190, 195 likes to hard land and 190 to float. If you have speed increments for gust, crosswinds, etc fly the plane to the ground and reduce thrust earlier, else it will float. Seats are not the most confortables for longer flights...
Wx radar often oversees something, specially when it is embedded, we used to call him Steve (after Steve Wonder). It is amazing how short you can stop the bird, even fullhouse, carbon brakes do a great job, together with the deceleration scale on the HUD you will be tempted to disconsider use of autobrake.
All in all ops are easy, only the load of electronic put into it make the EICAS bring up bogus messages quite frequently.

Have fun!

Broomstick Flier
10th Sep 2011, 18:03
Hi Toffair,

Thanks for the insights, the main concern seems to be the bleeds indeed, does the FMS compute descents using angle or rate of descent? How about the electrical system? Any reliability issues?

Best regards,
BF

Lord Spandex Masher
10th Sep 2011, 21:35
The FMS uses a flight path angle but it will indicate the VS required at TOD.

The seats, unless it's an option, have electric motors for vertical adjustment. Make sure your headset lead is not under, near to or around the gubbins under the seat or you'll chop the lead in half when you motor it.

The jumpseat is stowed behind the captains seat and can prevent the DV window from opening fully if it's incorrectly stowed (it's not obvious either way when it is stowed though).

There is a null area on the pedestal lighting adjustment knob. In bright/day light it can look as if your audio panels have lost power. Give the knob a wiggle or turn it up.

Reliability is top notch. I only had one no go in over four years.

Bleeds are occasionally temperamental but reliability has improved greatly and they usually give you a hint before they go pop, like Toffair mentioned.

No drama with electrical reliability.

The loadies hate the holds, low and dark so they appreciate it if you can leave the power on while they're doing their thing.

If the EICAS doesn't declutter airborne then you've either forgotten something silly, something has exceeded a limit or you've pressed the EICAS full button. Best to check carefully because things like the APU box are small and tend to blend in rather well.

The CCD can get a bit jittery sometimes so if you need to scroll up and down it's a good idea to use a finger on each side of the CCD pad, seems to desensitise it a bit.

Enjoy.

Broomstick Flier
11th Sep 2011, 23:01
LSM and olbie,

Thanks for the informative posts, and I will keep this in mind once I start to fly on a regular basis...

Do you have EFB class 1 or 2 on the machines you currently fly?

Cheers

Broomstick Flier
13th Sep 2011, 01:53
I see,

So you have a dedicated laptop to run the EPOP software? The FMS has no performace calculation (V speeds) capability (ou ours at least)...

How does the ice accretion Vref increase affect your operations?

Fly safe,

Piltdown Man
13th Sep 2011, 14:02
I've been flying the Brazilian Bitch for a couple of years now. Overall, I think it's the nastiest aircraft I've ever flown.

Here's why it's nasty:

1. No mode button lights on the Guidance Panel and a 'two elephant" wait for the new mode to appear on the PFD.
2. Six button presses to do a 'Direct.'
3. FMC mode selection and operation: Select mode, find twiddle button, look at PFD to see what you are dialing up.
4. Bullworker® aileron loadings not related to roll rate nor aerodynamic loadings.
5. Dreadfully specified, horribly programmed FMS. Each and every section works differently. It's as if they give the development to YTS employees.
6. Real howlers in the manuals.
7. Fragile construction of holds, doors and interior fittings.
8. Dreadful ride in turbulence.
9. Poor Autobrake programming.
10. No useful performance data in FMS.
11. Random Speed mode when using FMS speeds on approach.
12. Untrustworthy vertical profile in VNAV resulting in high likelihood of overspeed.
13. Horrible jumpseat.
14. Passenger vibration devices have little effect on overall drag.
15. You need ape-like hands to use the AP TCS button.
16. The EFB is another of amateurish piece of software. The world moved to a GUI years ago but not the knobs who put this crock together. I know I could do better.

But to be fair, its good points are:

1. It doesn't use much runway, either taking of or landing. Performance is never like to be restricting.
2. You are not the slowest person in the sky.
3. Passengers like it.
4. No central bar under the seats means more bag stowage area.
5. Best (manual) brakes I've ever used
6. Excellent steering
7. Good engineering synoptic pages so tech. issues can be sorted promptly.
8. Loads of Ooomppff!
9. Ice isn't an issue. Ice speeds add seven to eight knots on approach speeds Flaps 5 only and 10% or so to LDRs, so a non-event.
10. It's very cheap.
11. Toilets people can actually poo in.
12. Towing light (Green/Red light).
13. Rapid APU availability.
14. Good synoptic pages on EICAS.
15. Looks pretty.
16. Good visibility from the cockpit.
17. Brilliant power lever response.
18. There are lots of them flying.
19. External power can light the cabin and holds when you are not present (APU not permitted to run un-attended).
20. It's pretty good with fuel, say 1,800 kgs/hr with 100 pax and bags at 460 kts.
21. The FPV has always told the truth.

To be fair to the aircraft, it is an excellent glider so it's important not to rush and to take your time. Do not be forced into being hot and/or high. If you are unsure always ask for more track miles.

PM

Broomstick Flier
16th Sep 2011, 03:26
Hi PM,

Blimey! That is indeed a huge list of, errr, qualities :ugh:
Many thanks for taking the time to write the comprehensive list ... mostly welcome! The "nasty" section would be funny if not tragic... In 15 days I will be starting my sim sessions and will keep some of those flaws in mind.

We have dual HGS on ours as a standard feature and hopefully it will help to make the overall experience better...

On a side note, I spoke to a friend, former Embraer engineering/tech rep guy, and he said that some behaviour/flaws/WTF moments, can be explained, according to Embraer lingo, with three basic (and evasive) answers:
1 - It is the system logic
2 - This is this way due to certification requirements
3 - That is a project's characteristic

Go figure :p

Cheers
BF

Piltdown Man
16th Sep 2011, 21:36
The first few lessons should be a breeze. As for a type rating course, my overall advice would be:

1. Do as little pre-reading as possible. Moving ahead is pointless but obviously make sure you are keeping up with pack. However, if your company adheres to Embraer's operating philosophy, read, learn, sleep with the SOPM. The front pages describe exactly who does what when. Follow it!
2. Don't try and be smart. Take it slow. 210 kts is a sensible speed for most low level "Flaps 0" stooging around, one or two engines.
3. If you can't find the page you are looking for on the FMS, you'll probably find it on the NAV page.
4. If all else fails, go to the RADIO page, dial up the frequencies you require, select the needle and after pressing V/L or PREV, give the CRS knob a tweak.
5. Don't forget, there's no VOR tracking, per se.
6. In QRH terms, try and work out what is "Annunciated" and what is "Non-annunciated".
7. For all N-1, don't move your feet too quickly. Move them just enough to keep control and once everything is safely under control, 'neaten up' the trim/s.
8. Forget about the Overhead Panel. Apart from the position of the Seat Belt sign and External Light switches, there is absolutely no information presented there whatsover. With the exception of the previous items, any switch which is not where it should be will generate an EICAS message.
9. If any messages appear on the EICAS (blue, amber or red) perform the recall item (if required) and then go straight to the appropriate synoptic page for more information, if available.

PM

Dan B.
18th Sep 2011, 09:07
Not much to add to the previous posts... Except for the trick should you be too high: 210 Kts, Flaps 1, half speedbrakes! Very useful with playful ATC :E

BarbiesBoyfriend
18th Sep 2011, 09:46
First a/c I've had with the 'pigeon'.

Don't look at the attitude bars- fly the pigeon!

Raw Data ILS is dead easy. Just fly the ........:rolleyes:

Doesn't do turbulence at all well and some seem to find the 190 hard to land. If you get a greaser it will mostly be luck.

It can be a bitch when it's windy. Commit to memory the button pressing required on receipt of 'Windshear' warnings.

I quite agree about the button pressing frenzy for a simple 'direct to'. Bloody stupid.

This a/c llikes it's pilots to use the autos. frankly, given the flying abilities of many of our F/Os, this is no bad thing.

Trouble is, your flying skills will soon atrophy and then you'll join them.

EFATO. 'You dance. You die'
Don't rotate till she's running straight. Lock your foot while still on the runway and remember my instructors wise words.
'You dance, you die'.

Lord Spandex Masher
18th Sep 2011, 10:03
A Belgian from Flight Safety Paris per chance?

Or do they all sing the same song?!

BarbiesBoyfriend
18th Sep 2011, 10:35
Spandex. If I knew the Belgique for 'yes', I'd type it.

A wise owl.

RATpin
18th Sep 2011, 10:51
IMHO,if you find yourself high and fast in most jets with conventional speedbrakes,(F28/F100 & Bae 146 excepted) lowering the gear is your best friend,The E170/190 is no different in this regard.

Flap40
18th Sep 2011, 11:40
It has the best wipers of any aircraft that I have flown. Just don't use the intermittent setting while flying a flap 5 approach if you want to be able to see the runway.

As others have said, the weather radar is 5h1t. Use the RCT mode to get a hint of what it cannot see.

Broomstick Flier
18th Sep 2011, 12:54
Many thanks for the very informative answers..

"You dance, You die" is a good advice...

Are you guys using green dot for flaps extension or fixed flap schedule speeds? For the time being we are limited on fixed speeds.

BarbiesBoyfriend
18th Sep 2011, 13:13
The wx radar is ****, but...

Put in ACT and reduce the gain to 56%. If stuff still paints, avoid.

Otherwise it paints all wx, even stuff that is truly not worth avoiding.

Reducing the gain (actually reducing receiver sensitivity) helps sort the wheat from the chaff.

Lord Spandex Masher
18th Sep 2011, 22:37
Barbies, sounds like he might be the same chap that did my initial stuff up to the LST. Couldn't have asked for a nicer or better instructor. Learnt a lot from him and I wish I could remember his name.

Broomstick, we used a fixed speed schedule. Worked quite well and made the green dot largely irrelevant except as a cross check. That is until you lose the bugged speeds and then green dot plus 10 becomes a safe and sensible retraction schedule.

Can't remember exactly the requirements but the green dot became your initial drift down target speed, not min speed, at higher altitudes, just don't forget to add 10 in icing (I think that was the case) and that was the only time you used an icing additive on the 195. Or is my memory going?!

Piltdown Man
18th Sep 2011, 23:07
Are you guys using green dot for flaps extension or fixed flap schedule speeds? For the time being we are limited on fixed speeds.

We use whatever speeds we want. But what is certain is that 'Green Dot' (or Dot+10 in ice) is the least stressful for the aircraft. As for Hot and High, I have to be the expert! An truly biblical (totally un-economic and uncomfortable) rate of descent can be set up at 205kts, Flaps 2 and Gear down.

And another thing, at altitude 'Green Dot' moves as you change airspeed. It's computed like most other green dots, but on this plane some idiot has also added C/L. So maintaining altitude and reducing speed reduce green dot speed - of course!!??

PM

Flap40
19th Sep 2011, 06:58
In RCT you cannot adjust the gain (unless your radar is different to ours).

BarbiesBoyfriend
19th Sep 2011, 08:48
Flaps 40

My mistake. 'ACT' not 'RCT'. I'll edit the post now. Ta.

ACT is 'alt compensated tilt'. Works well and makes max use of the area being displayed on the MFD. Good for 'normal' use of the wx radar.

RCT (rain echo attenuated compensation techningue?) is something quite different. Bit of a 'specialised' mode for trying to see through heavy precip' etc.

Spandex.
Lambert (Bert) Ziegels? I'm sure he wouldn't mind me remindiing you, if I've got the right name? I've got his phone number also should you ever need it.

Piltdown Man
19th Sep 2011, 12:30
RCT (rain echo attenuated compensation techningue?) is something quite different. Bit of a 'specialised' mode for trying to see through heavy precip' etc.

Actually, I think this function is for something similar. When selected, it paints the area blue whenever there is total signal attenuation. The blue areas might be better described using by modifying the ancient charting phrase "Here (may) be dragons". What you know for sure is that the system hasn't a clue what's in the blue.

PM

Flap40
19th Sep 2011, 20:18
Exactly why I always fly with RCT selected having once been shafted by ACT and bee given no option but to fly through a CB as a result.

Broomstick Flier
11th Jan 2012, 14:18
Hi gents,

A couple of months passed and I am already finishing my route training and enjoying the Ejet quite a lot, despite some of her minor shortcomings.

Well, one thing still buggers me, related to the use of the TCS button: with the AP engaged its usage and effects are straightforward, but I am still trying to figure what it does with the AP disengaged. I noticed that it synchronises the FPV with the FD symbol, but that seems to be it, no other effect.

On my previous type, i.e., when pressing the TCS button and lets say flying with FLCH, this synchronised the FD bars with the current pitch and moved the speed bug to the current speed. I was expecting the same behaviour on the Ejet, but not. And the manuals and my TRIs had no clue either.

Am I missing something?

Best regards,
BF

ersh2k4
11th Jan 2012, 18:09
Flying the e190/195 here,

my advices would be:

- for descending, try to be a little bit under the FMS calculated path.
- If you have restrictions "at or above XXXX ft" it is a good habit to make a vertical direct to that position. for example, "5000A" meaning the FMS will calculate the ramp above 5000`. so you lock it on "5000" so the FMS calculates the descent to pass that pos. at exactly 5000`

this avoids you getting there high.

- a good thing is that, above the vertical profile on the MFD, the fms gives you the exact distance from the threshold, considering your entire route. so using this, a 3 to 1 mental calculation is a good thing. if you are at 15000 feet above field elevation at 50 miles of the airport, you are mostly ok. something above that requires your atention.

dont forget this: 200kt, flaps 2, gear down. If you are really high, this should do the trick!

When descending in FMS path, (magenta PTH) make sure you have the speed in your scan flow, the fms disregards speed, so it is easy to have a "high speed" alert.

Anyway, this is an easy to fly acft, very automatized and the workload is really low.

good luck!

Piltdown Man
11th Jan 2012, 21:19
How about this?

Flight director interface with the AP/FD button:
– Press and Hold the TCS:
– Synchronizes the Flight Director with the current airplane attitude.
– Release the TCS:
– The Flight Director returns to the lateral and vertical selection when
the TCS was pressed.
– With Roll/VS/FPA modes the FD maintains the airplane attitude
when the TCS is released.
– Autopilot interface with the AP/FD button:
– If the AP is engaged, pressing and holding the TCS will momentarily
override the AP. Releasing the TCS, the AP resumes airplane
control.

PM

FMSPEED
7th Jun 2012, 02:11
Hey guys...

here's a few tips i found useful for myself...


for the descent part itself i use 3.5 to 3.7 degrees FPA until 21 NM from the first app waypoint, after that i reduce the FPA manually to 2.5 to 2.4, that way the plane will decrease speed in a very good rate, and you're gonna be able to descend at idle power until 1500 or 1750 feet..the best part of all is that you won't have to use speedbrakes if you use this little tip.. For the landing part, make sure to always monitor the autothrottle movements under turbulent air...it tends to be a little bit ''lazy'' as you may say...:8 .. I always kind round it at 55% of N1 for flaps 5 and 60% for flaps full... for flaps 5 i start the power off at 40 feet RA and for full at 30 to 25 feet...( E190), flaps 5 is a good call for turbulent apps.. Hope it helps...Enjoy the Embraer!:ok:

John21UK
7th Jun 2012, 13:10
One other potential gotcha is that when cleared direct to xxx in LNAV/VNAV
the aircraft might aggressively nose dive to regain the original angle/path if the direct to cuts your track miles short. I tend to press FPA (thus green FMA) first before doing the direct to. Saves me the embarressment and keeps is smooth.

I always tend to fly 1 dot high on profile, then use a fraction of speedbrake, select manual speed 190 (ish) and let her slow down gently onto the glide. Obvisouly this is when you're doing the same approach a million times a month and you know how to play the game.

We (E190) were at 5500ft the other day when ATC cleared us for a straight in whilst doing 250 kts with 12 miles to go. (VMC) Captain showed me his trick to slow her down and it worked like a charm, even got a complement from ATC. Speedbrake full, gear down, flaps 1, flaps 2, speedbrake in etc... Established by 1000ft and it wasn't even that uncomfortable. (lot's of fun though!)

The E190 is dead easy to land IMHO. Much less tendancy to float compared to E170. (don't know about E195) I love flying it.

FMSPEED
25th May 2013, 07:12
Another trick i found very useful to get down .... Flap 3 + FLCH 190 knots...or even Flaps 4 + FLCH 150 knots (depending on how's traffic behind ya)...that will get you down like a brick..ahhhah and you don't even have to use the gear nor speed brakes for that trick...:cool:

grrowler
29th May 2013, 04:15
I would suggest caution using FLCH with Flap / Speed combinations if high on approach. It can lead to extreme rate of descent close to the ground and gets messy if A/T stays in idle Thrust eleveator mode, rather than thrust speed. (Sorry been a little while since I flew it so the exact modes are getting hazy).

I found hitting 5000 at 20nm, then reducing FPA to 1.9deg and decelerating/ configuring worked a treat for a "normal" approach.

Also from memory takes 800ft to slow from 280 to 250 in FLCH, so if you get 800 ft below the vnav profile then at 10800ft hit flch/ 250kts it works out nicely.

Good ship:ok:

ClimbSequence
30th May 2013, 05:35
Another trick is to draw a changing path.
If you have the opportunity to approach to an airport where traffic conditions allow you to do a non restricted descent. On perf init, set the speeds to 210/.64/3.5 when between 41k to 43k LW with no wind and create a PBD at around 45-50 miles to add a constraint of 13000' in order to obtain a path of 2.5 degrees for the remainder of the approach (here lies the key).It will let you to descent around 290, slow down to 250 by 10000' and position within flap extension speeds at 5000' provided no wind. It will keep you in idle saving some fuel. FMS speeds should be used throughout the descent.

Happy landings!!!

OnTheStep
30th May 2013, 13:05
the rules of thumb mentioned so far are all fine and good but it can be a bit cumbersome to always have to fight your way to some fixed alt/distance point.

i found these figures quite helpful when i flew the brazil nut:
(these are for clean config, no speedbrake, idle thrust)
- in level flight the embraer slows 10kts every 1nm
- in a 1000fpm descent it slows 10 kts every 2nm (or 10kts/3nm if you're heavy; +1nm for every 10kt component of tailwind)


you can use this to work your way back from whatever restriction you need to make on arrivals (or at least know if you have a chance of making them or not). you can also use this to ensure that you make 200kts and 3000'agl by the time you get to the IF.

either do the mental math or just use the fms to give yourself 1000'fpm descent segments by hardening altitudes at appropriate waypoints or building a P/B/D with alt restriction to make it happen.

bernardo_carvalho
13th Sep 2015, 11:39
Barbies, sounds like he might be the same chap that did my initial stuff up to the LST. Couldn't have asked for a nicer or better instructor. Learnt a lot from him and I wish I could remember his name.

Carlo Van Malangen