ECAM_Actions
16th Feb 2011, 15:38
Hi,
I'm struggling to find any information regarding how an FMC/FMS/FMGC (I think that is most types covered :E ) handles continuous climbs/descents.
The only time I've seen this is on RNAV departures/arrivals, and I wondered whether this particular way of flying was specific to RNAV procedures, and whether the flight management system can be persuaded to fly this way with pilot-entered waypoints (for example)?
e.g. suppose the aircraft is approaching a waypoint with the constraint CROSSING AT 8000 ft, yet the aircraft has the performance to be at 8000 ft 5 nm before the waypoint. On an RNAV departure I have seen the aircraft fly a path that will ensure it passes the waypoint at 8000 ft, but at a shallower climb angle than it is otherwise capable of. Is this standard for any type of waypoint, or only RNAV procedures?
ECAM Actions.
I'm struggling to find any information regarding how an FMC/FMS/FMGC (I think that is most types covered :E ) handles continuous climbs/descents.
The only time I've seen this is on RNAV departures/arrivals, and I wondered whether this particular way of flying was specific to RNAV procedures, and whether the flight management system can be persuaded to fly this way with pilot-entered waypoints (for example)?
e.g. suppose the aircraft is approaching a waypoint with the constraint CROSSING AT 8000 ft, yet the aircraft has the performance to be at 8000 ft 5 nm before the waypoint. On an RNAV departure I have seen the aircraft fly a path that will ensure it passes the waypoint at 8000 ft, but at a shallower climb angle than it is otherwise capable of. Is this standard for any type of waypoint, or only RNAV procedures?
ECAM Actions.