![]() |
This flow rate restriction does not really exist, other than that overall training footprint (and cost) increases if you make everyone have to do an additional course in order to obtain a long haul command. And there’s the reason why it has not already been enforced - money.
I am actually surprised the company went for increasing pay for existing short haul captains as well as new. Far cheaper to just give golden handshakes to new short haul captains from now on (payable over four years or some other timescale). That particular point was a win from BALPA as far as I can see. The problem was that all other pilots were receiving a pittance. |
So rather than an obvious impossibility what we have here is a desire/assumption by interested parties that it will not happen. From experience I would say don’t count on it, all you need is an eager new manager and a disjointed workforce and pilots will be directed to where the company need them to be.
|
Originally Posted by Flightdisclose
(Post 12095200)
Have the union given any comms on when the next offer will be presented?
We haven't even gotten the results of a survey we filled out nearly a month ago. So far all BALPA have said of it is that we apparently liked PCS more than we realised! |
I’m also hearing on the line that long-haul commands could come down to 15/16 years (with said expansion and retirements) - tempting those considering a SH command to wait a little longer in the LH RHS.. (increasingly so, like me), compounding current issues even further.
|
Originally Posted by HEJT2015
(Post 12096744)
I’m also hearing on the line that long-haul commands could come down to 15/16 years (with said expansion and retirements) - tempting those considering a SH command to wait a little longer in the LH RHS.. (increasingly so, like me), compounding current issues even further.
People who joined in 2011 have ok bids for this year on the 777 |
Originally Posted by HEJT2015
(Post 12096744)
I’m also hearing on the line that long-haul commands could come down to 15/16 years (with said expansion and retirements) - tempting those considering a SH command to wait a little longer in the LH RHS.. (increasingly so, like me), compounding current issues even further.
Originally Posted by SkyRocket10
(Post 12096817)
Long haul commands are already at 15 years!
People who joined in 2011 have ok bids for this year on the 777
Originally Posted by GS-Alpha
(Post 12095661)
I am actually surprised the company went for increasing pay for existing short haul captains as well as new. Far cheaper to just give golden handshakes to new short haul captains from now on (payable over four years or some other timescale). That particular point was a win from BALPA as far as I can see. The problem was that all other pilots were receiving a pittance.
In fact it was being taken from the PP34 SFOs by reducing their pension and locking them in to a freeze at a lower paypoint than their current Ts & Cs allowed. A point missed by the Balpa cheerleaders (funnily enough low to middle paypoint C32Ls) on the forums who whinged and moaned about being denied their £20k payrise conveniently forgetting not only was that money coming from some of their colleagues but those same colleagues actually were the ones who had allowed them to get command at a lower seniority than they should have had by them not bidding for C32L in the first place! |
Originally Posted by SkyRocket10
(Post 12096817)
Long haul commands are already at 15 years!
People who joined in 2011 have ok bids for this year on the 777 |
Originally Posted by bda321
(Post 12096870)
Is that separate to the BMI joiners?
BMI joined the year after, coinciding with the end of PP24. Will be interesting to see how many bid for Long Haul as the majority will be getting on in age now and in a decent enough place seniority wise on SH. After that you then get into the big wave of 2014-16. |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 16:24. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.