|
Career paths
Hello everyone, The airline I work for (major European one) no longer allows long haul FOs to upgrade directly as long haul captains. The standard career path is now short/medium haul FO, long haul FO, short/medium Captain, long haul Captain. For some of our FOs, it’s a big issue and legal actions are underway. Some of my fellow colleagues object that no other major airline (European or non-European) has implemented such a rule. I would very much appreciate if you could prove them wrong, should your airline work the same way. Please state the name of this airline as I want to be as accurate as possible. Thanks for helping me on this one |
In SAS you can stay as LH FO, and wait with upgrade until your seniority is high enough for the LH Captains list. That is why you often see FOs in their late 50´s wearing SAS uniform with 3 solid stripes. FO top salary is around 10.000 €, so no need to hurry into the left seat, and do 800 hrs/year in SH (around 600 sectors). In LH it is more like 65-80 sectors/year, which is much more attractive to most experienced pilots.
I don't see any reason why SAS would change this in the future, since it works for all. Sorry to hear about your situation. |
At my airline, which is not a major, there is a seniority list to be considered for command upgrade. On short-haul – besides a minimum amount of hours – there is a requirement of at least 5 years in the company and on long-haul – besides even more hours – the minimum is at least 8 years in the company. In case of need, the time in the company is not a hard requirement as long as you have the minimum hours.
|
KLM has the same rule, implemented a few years ago: FO SH - FO LH - CPT SH - CPT LH The guys who were already FO LH at the time could still go FO LH- CPT LH. all in conjuncture with the union, no legal cases as far as I know. |
Lufthansa has had the same rule for ages.
FO SH - FO LH - CPT SH - CPT LH Exception: you could go FO long - CPT Cargo (long) - CPT long FO money is very good. So keep waiting 15-20 years on long range til Captain upgrade is what most do. Usually 3-4 roundtrips a month. |
As far as I know, that's the 'rule' in most of the big companies |
Originally Posted by Cak
(Post 10399564)
As far as I know, that's the 'rule' in most of the big companies |
Originally Posted by 3Greens
(Post 10399803)
BA Can still go LH sfo>LH Captain. |
In my airline (part of Lufthansa Group) it‘s also mandatory to have been CMD Shorthaul before becoming CMD Longhaul.. |
Rightly so Wiggy. After all Virgin is only long haul and they promote from within so the argument for being a short haul captain first is totally redundant. |
Originally Posted by RexBanner
(Post 10399960)
Rightly so Wiggy. After all Virgin is only long haul and they promote from within so the argument for being a short haul captain first is totally redundant. |
Same in Swiss...
F/O short > F/O long > CMD short > CMD long |
Same in Qantas and Korean I believe. |
Originally Posted by oboema
(Post 10399404)
KLM has the same rule, implemented a few years ago: FO SH - FO LH - CPT SH - CPT LH The guys who were already FO LH at the time could still go FO LH- CPT LH. all in conjuncture with the union, no legal cases as far as I know. |
Major US carrier here. Strictly seniority based. Many of our wide body FO’s have flown narrow body Captain, but a few haven’t. A few WB FO’s “hop the garbage sack” and go directly from wide body FO to wide body Captain never being a NB Captain. Whatever your seniority can hold, you can bid. From my perspective as a training Captain, I believe having experience as narrow body Captain prior to becoming a wide body Captain is a definite plus, but I would fight any attempt to legislate it contractually. |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 06:04. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.