PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Terms and Endearment (https://www.pprune.org/terms-endearment-38/)
-   -   bmi strike? (https://www.pprune.org/terms-endearment/141061-bmi-strike.html)

Fuzzy112 13th October 2004 21:16


pay offer from the management that falls well short of what is reasonable
I say again Count, tell us what the offer is that falls well short of what is reasonable so we can all decide????? You clearly know what the most recent offer is so how about letting us ALL know what is going on. The offer is NOT on the BALPA website.

Mike Rosewhich 13th October 2004 21:25

Fuzzy,

There have been 2 dispatches from Balpa. The first had some indication of a slightly improved offer, and the second stated that some clarification would be needed before being issued to members. Further, higher level, meeting to take place this week.

MR

Arkroyal 25th October 2004 09:25

I hear you guys have settled.

If so, what was the deal?

Fuzzy112 25th October 2004 10:06

Guess you heard wrong then!

keepitlit 25th October 2004 16:16

i agree a bit to go yet oh and I think the notices handed in are still increasing (heard about 25).

rgds

K.I.L.:oh:

Anne.Nonymous 1st November 2004 11:45

Just to say that I see the bmi option is back on the Private forum list.

Anne :O

b mi baby 23rd November 2004 16:26

Final Offer Rejected
 
Things just got a whole lot more complicated at bmi

Pilots have rejected the 'Final Offer' by 70% to 30%

What happens next?

alterego 23rd November 2004 16:33

BMI Baby

Do youmean mainline or aby when you talk about the 'final offer'?

Fuzzy112 23rd November 2004 16:41

Despite his name I think he means bmi mainline - I got the text this afternoon!

Anne.Nonymous 23rd November 2004 20:19

Likewise. BALPA has done well.

Anne :O

Max Angle 23rd November 2004 21:31


BALPA has done well.
Not yet they havn't.

Anne.Nonymous 25th November 2004 18:18

Perhaps you could explain what you want them to do - particularly in view of the strength of the rejection?

Anne :O

acbus1 19th January 2005 06:38

Rumour on another thread is that Mainline have accepted 1.5%.

Is this correct? :confused:

Chalky 19th January 2005 15:04


Rumour on another thread is that Mainline have accepted 1.5%. Is this correct?
No;)

acbus1 17th April 2005 05:39

I see from the "Terms and Endearment" forum that baby have accepted a deal for 2004.

How are the Mainliners doing in their 2004 negotiations?

lamina 17th April 2005 06:17

Why don't you rejoin bmi and find out!!!!:p







P.S. All concluded months ago

I.C.Nosignal 17th April 2005 07:26

This wouldn`t be an attempt to stir up a little bit of unrest would it?? :ooh: I know its been a while since acbus1 has had a dig at bmi, but I really cannot see him rejoining especially with all the other "better" companies out there who would benefit from his valuable,reasoned opinions and loyal services!:ok:

acbus1 17th April 2005 17:49

lamina


Why don't you rejoin bmi and find out!!!!
I say, steady on old chap!

I'd rather go on the streets! :} ;)



But maybe all the peeps who've followed this thread and contributed to it may appreciate a little summary of the final outcome.

That's all I ask, please.

Don't you welcome the interest?

I won't even pass comment, unless clarification is needed (the baby thread was hard work in that respect)..........must be getting soft in my middle age. :ooh: ;)

acbus1 21st April 2005 17:12

No reply to my last, so can't have been much of a 2004 pay deal or we'd have had it in neon lettering by now.

Still, almost a year of strike threats has achieved one thing.......the bmi management now know (as if they did'nt already) that BALPA will never really support a bmi workforce strike.

Sad.


Just a reminder.........the 2005 pay deal is due in wage packets right now.

Better not ask how that's going.........don't want to be accused of stirring, do I?

Maybe we'll hear in......ooh......twelve months? Then again, based upon the conclusion to this thread, there ain't much point taking any interest in the first place.

I.C.Nosignal 22nd April 2005 06:56

perhaps the reason for no replies is that no one is interested in pathetic attempts to try and rabble rouse by a disgruntled EX "employee"


All times are GMT. The time now is 23:58.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.