PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Terms and Endearment (https://www.pprune.org/terms-endearment-38/)
-   -   Virgin Pilots (https://www.pprune.org/terms-endearment/588343-virgin-pilots.html)

ManagedNav 15th Dec 2016 19:58

Virgin Pilots
 
Rumors abound of a possible strike by Virgin Atlantic pilots. Is there any truth to this?

PlankBoy 15th Dec 2016 23:48

No - there's a vote that will likely result in a period of 'work to rule' meaning the majority will only fly their roster and not volunteer for uncovered flights. Hopefully cooler heads will prevail on all sides before it comes to that.

ManagedNav 16th Dec 2016 05:24

So, let's say it does come to that; what if a partner airline decides to add extra segments in order to mitigate any loss of block hours flown by Virgin....Would that airline's pilots be inadvertently flying "struck" work or otherwise scabbing?

Eye off the ball 16th Dec 2016 06:53

I would argue that they would be doing exactly as you suggest. For that reason I'm sure they are unlikely to do it. If they did, it certainly wouldn't be inadvertent.

jmgthepilot 16th Dec 2016 10:08

This is what the head of the union is saying https://vimeo.com/193526538/2dee49b9a2

HeartyMeatballs 16th Dec 2016 15:18

Announced here not striking but will 'work to contract'.

KelvinD 16th Dec 2016 15:35

Virgin Pilots
 
BBC just announced Virgin pilots to take action "short of strike action" from 23rd December.
What does that mean? Are they going to shout "I am very cross" when boarding their aircraft?

Alex Whittingham 16th Dec 2016 15:36

BBC News - Virgin Atlantic pilots vote to take action short of strike in union recognition row from 23 December

MATELO 16th Dec 2016 15:38

Maybe they have been told to hold short......

Hotel Tango 16th Dec 2016 15:47

No doubt it will mean they will work by the book without extending any (legal) favours to the management. This may well result in some delays and cancellations of flights.

gbotley 16th Dec 2016 16:05

@KelvinD,

Liking the humour, but it's essentially the Virgin Pilots Union wanting recognition as the sole union of the company. It looks like it's' simply going to mean pilots won't offer favours for the operational management. Most likely refusing to use discretional flying or additional flying days/standby support.

SOURCE:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-38347181

bignose340 16th Dec 2016 16:09

Well done the PPU now don't blink and stand firm...... unlike those clowns at BALPA did a few years ago!

Astir 511 16th Dec 2016 18:01

Judean Peoples Front!
 
Hilarious watching as Unions spend their energy fighting each other rather than the Employer! Splitters

vctenderness 16th Dec 2016 19:12

Virgin pilots and virgin stewardesses hoping to come together in the new year!

2Planks 16th Dec 2016 19:43

What's the % split between Virgin BALPA members and PPU members?

oldchina 16th Dec 2016 19:45

So what are they complaining about ?

DIBO 16th Dec 2016 21:47

I know, it's all about semantics, but if Virgin pilots and virgin stewardesses have been f**ked up by their management, can we still call them Virgin pilots and virgin stewardesses?

FL370 Officeboy 16th Dec 2016 22:18

The PPU only exists to go on strike. They were formed by a disaffected bunch that weren't marched out on strike when they were desperate to do so. They HAVE to go on strike otherwise their whole reason for existence becomes irrelevant. It doesn't matter what the issue was, they'd call out a strike regardless.

However, the Company know all the above and will play their cards accordingly. The end result will not be to the greater good of the VS pilots.

What a shame.

noflynomore 16th Dec 2016 22:27

In my previous company - one that desperately needed such action BALPA made it abundantly clear on numerous occasions over the years that "working to rule", such as turning up on time as opposed to the usual 20 minutes early in order to get a briefing done in the 5 minutes "allowed" or declining to go into discretion was illegal action and contrary to all union rules and agreements and would result in all sorts of personal sanctions.

Apparenetly, they said, if you habitually bend over and show up early (many FOs routinely turned up 30 mins before report time imagining it earned them kudos and always fraudulently declared an imaginary report time - frequently busting min rest) , require as much time as you actually need for a briefing (as opposed to how much the Co. "allows" you) or do discretion as a matter of course then you somehow de-facto agree to this as a normal part of your contract and by withdrawing it you are in breach of contract - despite what is being happily accepted by the company being demonstrably illegal, unsafe or by definition not theirs to expect, yet the flatly refuse to condemn such blatantly illegal procedures.

It's an outrageous abuse of the goodwill/desperation of particularly junior aircrew though this cancer is advancing through the ranks with seniority as airmanship gives way to P2F kowtowing as they are now increasingly taking over the LH seats. Not that my generation was much better at defending ourselves, we just had even less to lose.

Thad Jarvis 16th Dec 2016 22:49

Action short of strike... management must be quaking in their boots. What next? A very strongly worded letter? :rolleyes:


All times are GMT. The time now is 19:57.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.