PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Terms and Endearment (https://www.pprune.org/terms-endearment-38/)
-   -   Certain Religion is now a requirement (https://www.pprune.org/terms-endearment/540780-certain-religion-now-requirement.html)

B737900er 30th May 2014 21:14

Certain Religion is now a requirement
 
Geofoto LLC is recruting one pilot for a Aerial Survey project in Saudi Arabia. Project is expected to last one-two month. Payment will be per day. Project specifications require a muslim pilot.
Requirements:
CPL pilot licence
Type rating PA31/42
min PIC 500 fh
min PIC on type 100 fh
Project specific requirements:
religion: muslim (project specifications demand a muslim pilot for flying in Saudi Arabia)
Advantage:
experience in Aerial Survey flying

Is this the beginning of the end, to ask for a specific religion to be eligible?

gorter 30th May 2014 21:26

Their country their train set their rules. I'm going to assume it has something to do with Mecca or Medina or anything else pilgrimage related.

DooblerChina 30th May 2014 22:08

No, it's not the beginning of the end. More likely survey work over religious sites which can not be overflown by non-Muslims.

ekwhistleblower 31st May 2014 08:47

Is that written in the Quaran?

INeedTheFull90 31st May 2014 09:04

It would be interesting to see reactions if it were a Christian only requirements. The PC brigade would be up in arms.

Superpilot 31st May 2014 09:11

The world has long been used to Saudi Arabia's requirements in order to enter Mecca (you must be a Muslim), so why should an aviation job overflying the same sites you'd be visiting on the ground be any different? Stop trying to compare this situation to the West. Our governments put up with this backwards and totalitarian state so we can get cheap oil and plant military bases. Ultimately making aviation affordable for the masses and giving rise to your careers. It's a screwed up world but there you go.

BTW, try applying to the Mission Aviation Fellowship as a non-Christian.

TowerDog 31st May 2014 09:48

Been overflying Mecca many times, all infidels in the cockpit.

Never been a problem

mutt 31st May 2014 10:38


Been overflying Mecca many times
I doubt it, as it has a prohibited area around it to an unlimited altitude.

Globally Challenged 31st May 2014 11:35


I doubt it, as it has a prohibited area around it to an unlimited altitude.
Indeed, I heard that 104% of the ISS budget goes to complying with that. :ok:

Luke SkyToddler 3rd Jun 2014 00:19

Woop de doo

MAF - one of the largest GA organizations in the world - has had a requirement for many decades to not only to be a christian, but to have a letter of reference from a pastor, and a history of "demonstrated involvement in your local church", and I've never heard anyone crying about it on PPRUNE :rolleyes:

I don't believe religious fundamentalism has a place in ANY flight deck but, what's good for the goose is good for the gander

hifly787 3rd Jun 2014 05:39

Would the US allow a Muslim to fly Air Force one ?

Um... lifting... 3rd Jun 2014 06:21


Would the US allow a Muslim to fly Air Force one ?
How do you know one hasn't already? The answer to that, of course, is that you don't. Ridiculous question, really, as no religious or personal loyalty test can be applied to any such position. However, the Air Force's religious problems have generally been with fundamentalist Protestant proselytizers, so it is probably unlikely it's occurred.


Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Piltdown Man 3rd Jun 2014 06:32


Would the US allow a Muslim to fly Air Force one ?
I reckon they would. If the man in front of them ticks the boxes he'll get the job. And that is the difference between a First and Third world country. Its manners, not money, that make'eth the man.

greenedgejet 4th Jun 2014 15:22

The clue is in the title!
 
Arguments about MAF are pretty nonsensical. The clue is in the NGO's title! And they do a hell of a lot of good even for Sir Bob Geldof.

Tis a bit like suggesting a preist or the pope's role should be open to anti Catholics!

That said I've not seen any atheistic groups excluding God believers from their "higher" echelons - but why would someone want to?

GlueBall 7th Jun 2014 13:29

High flying pilots always have an edge in connecting with that imaginary friend in the sky. :rolleyes:

Iver 7th Jun 2014 17:26

Not a surprise.

DHC4 21st Jun 2014 22:31

Religion is a very strange thing, don't forget as a Catholic you can't legally be PM of the UK. Although Disraeli was a Jew, not sure if he still was when he became PM.

Blantoon 21st Jun 2014 23:21


Their country their train set their rules. I'm going to assume it has something to do with Mecca or Medina or anything else pilgrimage related.
And on my train set I'll only employ males, or white people, or heterosexuals... The "their train set" argument holds no water at all.

Reprehensible.

mikedreamer787 22nd Jun 2014 02:55

Agree with mutt.

OE(P)-01

UNL
___
GND

Approx 40nm SE of OEJN

In any case I don't see a
problem them wanting a
muslim for photographic
work over local religious
sites. Makes sense to me.

Ivan aromer 22nd Jun 2014 17:27

Religious pilots
 
When I worked for Saudia (CC907) it was alleged that the heli pilots on the air ambulance where "honarary Muslims" to allow them to fly over and land in the Holy cities!


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:10.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.