Part-time working?
 

I work 50% part-time at a large UK airline. I get less than 50% of a full-timers leave allocation and less than 50% of days off. The company say that this is to offset the extra training costs involved with part-time working.

Is this normal practice? Is it legal?

Well, it's normal practice in La La land...as you've found out.

Legal? Why not? If you signed up to a swindle - which it is, then that's what you get.

If you're so disloyal as to want to work part time why would you expect to be treated fairly?

ZeBedie,

I'd guess that if you get 50% or more of the minimum legal leave entitlement then it would be legal. If it is morally correct is a different matter.

If this is the general attitude of your colleagues I am glad I don't work for EasyJet

Have a look on the Dti websitehttp://www.dti.gov.uk/index.html

Has lots of help for part timers, I believe you should be treated the same as full timers.

PART-TIME WORKERS (PREVENTION OF LESS FAVOURABLE TREATMENT) REGULATIONS 2000

FACT-SHEET FOR PART-TIMERS

The aim of the Regulations, which came into force on 1 July 2000, is to ensure that part-time workers are treated no less favourably in their employment conditions than comparable full-timers, unless this is justified on objective grounds. (The Part-time Workers (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2000 (Amendment) Regulations 2002 (SI 2002/2035) made two amendments to the Regulations, dealing with comparators and with access to pension schemes.)

This means that part-timers must receive (pro rata where appropriate) the same treatment as comparable full-timers. This will include no less favourable:

rates of pay (including overtime pay, once they have worked more than the normal full-time hours);
access to pension schemes and pension scheme benefits;
access to training and career development;
holiday entitlement;
entitlement to career break schemes, contractual sick pay, contractual maternity and parental pay; and
treatment in the selection criteria for promotion and transfer, and for redundancy.

In order for a claim to be made, part-timers will need to identify a comparable full-timer who is receiving more favourable treatment. There are several tests to establish who is a comparable full-timer. The part-timer must:

work for the same employer as the full-timer, and
do the same or broadly similar work (taking into account experience and skills where relevant) as the full-timer.
Part-time workers who believe that they have been treated in a manner which infringes the Regulations have the right to receive a written statement of reasons for the treatment. The part-timer must submit a request in writing, and the employer must return the written statement within 21 days. Part-timers who still believe they are being treated less favourably, and who are not satisfied that this treatment is objectively justified, can make a complaint to an Employment Tribunal against their employer. The Tribunal may require the employer to pay the part-timers compensation if it finds in their favour.

There is also protection for workers who return part-time to a job they previously did full-time.

IRR, don't you do irony?

There's a clue in the colour...

ZeBedie: Is it your choice to work part time?? or there are not available vacancies for full timers??