IAG: BA restructuring may cost 12,000 jobs
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Planet Moo Moo
Posts: 1,279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's using the crisis as the basis for a massive 'land grab' and the ability to push through a full 'wish list' combination using the Covid 19 crisis as cover.
The Cabin Crew letter is, in my opinion, frankly brutal. They know that they will chop the majority of WW and EF crew with this. There is little or no way that those employees on those contracts will do the same work for the remuneration given by what will effectively be 'the Gatwick' contract. The demise of the service industries across the UK will give rise to a willing flow of applicants who can be easily and quickly trained up to become part of this new, 'efficient' workforce. Again, nothing they could have pushed through without the pandemic as the available group of recruits wouldn't have been there or simply wouldn't accept a slave driven, zero hours contract. Totally opportunistic.
As for Schedule K and Gatwick, it doesn't take much of a leap to see what WW is after especially given his interest in Norwegian in the past. Kill off Schedule K, as called for already, close down the base at Gatwick, hostile buyout of NAS UK operation. Repaint, re-brand as British Airways Holidays and you have a set up SH/LH hub and spoke operation using new 737's and 787's. Add in the ability to restructure the debt down to 1-1.5% and the already existing BA back office and services structure and you have a neat, cheap low-cost holiday carrier branded in BA colours. Only if you can get rid of that pesky Scheduling agreement though.
The rest is all the 'stuff' that as annoyed the senior management for years as they pick and choose what parts of the 'legacy' agreements suit their current agenda. Absence and sickness management? A desperately needed amendment during a pandemic!
Even O'Leary reckons the SH market will recover within 2 years and he's normally the pessimistic one! So El Macho claiming 'several' years for LH whilst all the business travelers are already fed up working from home with Skype/Zoom/Team etc. and missing their lunches, dinners, bars and expense accounts during meetings seems more targeted toward scaremongering the staff than reality. He's never had the business acumen to see that far forward so why start now?
BA provided almost 80% of IAG's combined profit last financial year. What a great idea going forward this won't be. Relationship reset? Well I suppose it is in a way.
The Cabin Crew letter is, in my opinion, frankly brutal. They know that they will chop the majority of WW and EF crew with this. There is little or no way that those employees on those contracts will do the same work for the remuneration given by what will effectively be 'the Gatwick' contract. The demise of the service industries across the UK will give rise to a willing flow of applicants who can be easily and quickly trained up to become part of this new, 'efficient' workforce. Again, nothing they could have pushed through without the pandemic as the available group of recruits wouldn't have been there or simply wouldn't accept a slave driven, zero hours contract. Totally opportunistic.
As for Schedule K and Gatwick, it doesn't take much of a leap to see what WW is after especially given his interest in Norwegian in the past. Kill off Schedule K, as called for already, close down the base at Gatwick, hostile buyout of NAS UK operation. Repaint, re-brand as British Airways Holidays and you have a set up SH/LH hub and spoke operation using new 737's and 787's. Add in the ability to restructure the debt down to 1-1.5% and the already existing BA back office and services structure and you have a neat, cheap low-cost holiday carrier branded in BA colours. Only if you can get rid of that pesky Scheduling agreement though.
The rest is all the 'stuff' that as annoyed the senior management for years as they pick and choose what parts of the 'legacy' agreements suit their current agenda. Absence and sickness management? A desperately needed amendment during a pandemic!
Even O'Leary reckons the SH market will recover within 2 years and he's normally the pessimistic one! So El Macho claiming 'several' years for LH whilst all the business travelers are already fed up working from home with Skype/Zoom/Team etc. and missing their lunches, dinners, bars and expense accounts during meetings seems more targeted toward scaremongering the staff than reality. He's never had the business acumen to see that far forward so why start now?
BA provided almost 80% of IAG's combined profit last financial year. What a great idea going forward this won't be. Relationship reset? Well I suppose it is in a way.
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BA must offer ‘suitable alternative employment’ to anyone facing redundancy (as long as you have been working there for two years or more). It could offer new jobs at LHR, but with new T&Cs.
However, if you live in East Grinstead and work at LGW and face the commute to LHR in a new, less well paid, role, whatever is on offer might not be that attractive in terms of time and cost to the employee.
BA cannot force pay cuts on staff that breach terms of contract, unless the employee voluntarily agrees to it. Trying to frighten employees into accepting worse terms of employment by holding the axe over LGW operations looks to me like hedging bets. BA thinks it can either save alot of money if it gains agreement to worsen terms and keep (some?) of its LGW ops open, which it can always close later on, or close it altogether now and concentrate at LHR T5. Either way it slashes costs.
Given the corporate culture at BA, this really shouldn't surprise anyone. I wouldn't hold out much hope for anything more than statutory minimum payout either.
It's very tough being made redundant in normal times, but so much worse now. My thoughts are with those under notice. I know how gut wrenching it is.
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: On the road
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Don’t think the Home Counties (what, why?), plummy middle England thing was relevant or well placed. Not likely to illicit sympathy or probably chime with many at that firm.
But outside the sentiment, meat and potatoes points are good.
Awful times.
But outside the sentiment, meat and potatoes points are good.
Awful times.
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Dublin
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Under redundancy legislation, it is always the role that is made redundant, not the person. There is no need to look for 'loopholes', because there are plenty of criteria that justify redundancy, set out in legislation. One key redundancy reasonableness criterion is the physical location of the role. This may be what is behind the talk of closing operations at Gatwick. It would be legally more straightforward to make all LGW-based employees redundant, because the base is closing (ie very hard to challenge the redundancy in consultation, or at an Employment Tribunal afterwards).
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Aalborg
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is truly awful.. I feel sorry for the pilots that left Flybe just before its demise to join BA.....
I simply cannot believe that during a global crisis a company is seeking to take advantage by screwing its employees and I can’t believe WW stayed on to do it.
I know its show business not show friends but this is taking the piss!
I didn't think Virgin should receive a hand out but now I hope they do and WW is told to F$%k off back to Madrid.
No Chance they'll close LGW, Jet2 are probably already planning to open a base and buy some 787s from Norwegian
I simply cannot believe that during a global crisis a company is seeking to take advantage by screwing its employees and I can’t believe WW stayed on to do it.
I know its show business not show friends but this is taking the piss!
I didn't think Virgin should receive a hand out but now I hope they do and WW is told to F$%k off back to Madrid.
No Chance they'll close LGW, Jet2 are probably already planning to open a base and buy some 787s from Norwegian
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Nowhere
Posts: 657
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There was significant outcry when a certain Irish COO tried to do similar at the orange loco - so much so that senior government bods were 'aware'. I see no difference in this attack than in the former, and so I would hope there will be as much outcry / awareness this time.
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: French Riviera
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A few key points . No one is flying . Zero cashflow . Ballot asap for an indefinite strike . Its got to be better than a zero hours contract for the poor sods left flogging across the pond at some ridiculous hour of the night .
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: uk
Posts: 913
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It depends on who/where the 12,000 employees are that receive the individual redundancy 'at risk' letter as part of their 45-day statutory consultation. I've not seen any details of that letter or who's received it - if it's even been issued yet.
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Nowhere
Posts: 657
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is one of the most disgusting things I’ve seen throughout this whole debacle. How can they even think this is morally acceptable?
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Always moving
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Summing up: Spanish govt has lent money to Iberia and Vlg as a bank. Iberia and Vlg will have to pay back with a more flexible calendar and with less fees.
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Luton
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BA have issued the letter to the Union that says clearly "all cabin crew, regardless of contract at LHR are at risk (listing all three contracts and the ranks of the crew under each contract), all 3 employment contracts at LHR will be removed and will not apply in future and a new contract will be issued and if crew do not sign it they will be dismissed from the business by way of Redundancy or Other Substantive reason"
They're making it clear that people will exit the business during a period of mid June to end December 2020 and that redundancy will be comply with statutory minimums and will not be enhanced due to the current environment.
It is clearly a premeditated plan, they've had sat on the shelf waiting for an opportunity to implement and being the low live beings they are they have chosen this moment, mid furlough, to implement and screw over the crew (regardless of whether they are EF, WW or MF) whilst paying Willy an additional £3m bonus.
The result will be, even for those that stay, a fully disgruntled work force, offering even poorer service than they do already, and I hope it is kept in the headlined long enough for the world to see them for what they are and stop flying with them out of principle. Hope the business fails big time.
They're making it clear that people will exit the business during a period of mid June to end December 2020 and that redundancy will be comply with statutory minimums and will not be enhanced due to the current environment.
It is clearly a premeditated plan, they've had sat on the shelf waiting for an opportunity to implement and being the low live beings they are they have chosen this moment, mid furlough, to implement and screw over the crew (regardless of whether they are EF, WW or MF) whilst paying Willy an additional £3m bonus.
The result will be, even for those that stay, a fully disgruntled work force, offering even poorer service than they do already, and I hope it is kept in the headlined long enough for the world to see them for what they are and stop flying with them out of principle. Hope the business fails big time.
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Planet Moo Moo
Posts: 1,279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
world to see them for what they are and stop flying with them out of principle. Hope the business fails big time.
Ever seen Monty Python? Syrian Suicide Squad? Similar level.
Markos wrote:
It's still money, a credit line, something to keep the 'wolf from the door' Willy 'dick waving' Walsh is on record that no help, at all, should be given to ANY airline. Utter hypocrisy, and his workforce is suffering because of it.
Please let's stick to the real facts. The Spanish govt hasn't issued a bailout for Iberia and Vueling. They have just offered a credit line throught the ICO (Offical Credit Institute). That is money (liquidity), to avoid the companies collapse. This credit lines have better T&C's than the traditional banks or investors. This "ICO" credits have been also offered to hundreds of company through all the sectors in Spain.
Summing up: Spanish govt has lent money to Iberia and Vlg as a bank. Iberia and Vlg will have to pay back with a more flexible calendar and with less fees.
Summing up: Spanish govt has lent money to Iberia and Vlg as a bank. Iberia and Vlg will have to pay back with a more flexible calendar and with less fees.
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Centre of Universe
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think BA have opened the bottom drawer of problems they long wanted to fix and thrown it in. For BA staff worried about CV19 to receive this at this time is a worry. No mention of how many Directors are going to get the bullet I assume...
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Botswana
Posts: 887
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
WW doesn’t care though because he’s not a normal human being, he lacks any basic empathy. In short he’s a psychopath. Unfortunately these are traits that are widespread in business nowadays. Don’t even bother asking what they think when they look in the mirror. They just don’t care.
Fight fire with fire and go on the offensive.
Call a strike, ground the fleet, Pilots first and if CC and others want to join let them.
The country is looking the other way at the moment and aren't able to fly, so you won't hurt the man on the street, however you will hurt management who will be making a plan to get aircraft back in the air.
If T5 is closed, then they are really going to struggle.
Call a strike, ground the fleet, Pilots first and if CC and others want to join let them.
The country is looking the other way at the moment and aren't able to fly, so you won't hurt the man on the street, however you will hurt management who will be making a plan to get aircraft back in the air.
If T5 is closed, then they are really going to struggle.
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
WW doesn’t care though because he’s not a normal human being, he lacks any basic empathy. In short he’s a psychopath. Unfortunately these are traits that are widespread in business nowadays. Don’t even bother asking what they think when they look in the mirror. They just don’t care.
Many, many years ago I had a meeting with our firm's chief accountant who was demanding we cut staffing on a project because the company 'needed' to save money. I explained precisely why this was a very bad idea and what the consequences would be, including that we would be breaching the contract we had with the client for doing what he was demanding. He then simply repeated his demand to drop the headcount. I suggest he could save even more money if the business got rid of all staff altogether. I swear than for a second my sarcastic idea crossed his mind as a viable option.
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Middlesesx
Posts: 2,075
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There seems to be a problem on here that many do not seem to grasp the severity of the problem. It is irrelevant the callous management style exercised at the present time. BA staff must be completely aware of the situation and to many it has not come as a surprise. As for personal abusive attacks on WW, that achieves nothing. How do those on here assume that thousands of staff doing nothing can be kept on the payroll until things get better. As for the last post 'call a strike' that is nonsense and the one before calling WW a psychopath should be removed. If threaders cannot contribute sensibly then say nothing. Peoples livelihoods are at stake here!