Norwegian B787 - LGW based
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Scaremongering. And that ad nauseam repeated "flags of convenience " argument is pathetic, if it were true than no carrier with an Irish AOC and fully compliant to the regulations of the IAA could fly to the US 
The US Big 3 control 38% of NAT Traffic, Norwegian, although growing rapidly, has just 3% of ASK and on a lot of their routes, they don't even have an American competitor. NAIs narrowbody ops out of Ireland to the east coast will be completely new, as there is no US competition at all for these kind of flights. That Norwegian is singled out as the devil in person which will destroy the complete US Airline Industry with the over and over repeated half-truths or simply false statements is not only totally crap and unfounded, it shows that the whole argument against them is agenda driven (protectionist and anti competitive) and not based on the facts at hand. And the facts show clearly that not only the Norwegian operation is legit, but also that the competition from Norwegian has a minuscule impact on the US big 3, is creating jobs in the US and has a positive effect on the economy and therefore does not actually warrant such a strong reaction. I refer again to the link I posted earlier of the in my opinion excellent analysis on the subject, if anyone is really interested in a factual discussion.
The US Big 3 control 38% of NAT Traffic, Norwegian, although growing rapidly, has just 3% of ASK and on a lot of their routes, they don't even have an American competitor. NAIs narrowbody ops out of Ireland to the east coast will be completely new, as there is no US competition at all for these kind of flights. That Norwegian is singled out as the devil in person which will destroy the complete US Airline Industry with the over and over repeated half-truths or simply false statements is not only totally crap and unfounded, it shows that the whole argument against them is agenda driven (protectionist and anti competitive) and not based on the facts at hand. And the facts show clearly that not only the Norwegian operation is legit, but also that the competition from Norwegian has a minuscule impact on the US big 3, is creating jobs in the US and has a positive effect on the economy and therefore does not actually warrant such a strong reaction. I refer again to the link I posted earlier of the in my opinion excellent analysis on the subject, if anyone is really interested in a factual discussion.
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is that your way of telling everyone that you either aren't capable or wiling to engage in a facts based non polemic debate? I would love to hear a facts based argument as to why NAI, an EU registered airline which is fully compliant to the rules of an EU member state, should not be awarded US foreign air carrier rights under the US-EU open skies agreement. The DoT would to hear one too, as they and their brigade of lawyers actually spend three years looking for one, without success (big surprise).
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sydney
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The DOT did not issue Norwegian’s US permit for almost three years, while most permits are issued within weeks following application. Ultimately, the DOT may have had no choice in the matter.
Obama has made no secret of his dislike for Putin and last week ordered a full investigation of any Russian influence affecting the election outcome. In a move that would anger Putin, the US wants a submarine base in northern Norway, and:-
“it must be treated politically”
http://www.dagbladet.no/2016/05/28/n...tikk/44371919/
But what news from my union chums, the ones held in such contempt by the German based Kjos mouthpiece and purveyor of Norwegian snake-oil;
December 8, AFL-CIO union, TTD – Press Release:
http://ttd.org/news-and-media/press-...dministration/
“WASHINGTON, DC — Transportation union leaders across all sectors gathered today for their post-election meeting to assess the landscape in Washington and lay the groundwork for a unified effort under a Trump Administration.
“Our discussion today was focused on boosting investment in transportation and protecting the rights of working people against a torrent of political attacks designed to weaken unions,” said Edward Wytkind, president of the Transportation Trades Department, AFL-CIO(TTD).
“We also vowed to defend against assaults on labor and safety protections in our laws, and work with those who want to change American trade policy so it aligns with the economic interests of American workers.”
The Executive Committee took aim at the wrongheaded decision by the U.S. Department of Transportation to approve the controversial application of Norwegian Air International (NAI) for a foreign air carrier permit.
“Transportation unions were clear today in their resolve to stop the first-ever job-killing ‘flag-of-convenience’ airline sanctioned by our government from destroying U.S. airline jobs. We will continue urging President Obama to intervene and reverse the NAI decision,” Wytkind said”
Obama has made no secret of his dislike for Putin and last week ordered a full investigation of any Russian influence affecting the election outcome. In a move that would anger Putin, the US wants a submarine base in northern Norway, and:-
“it must be treated politically”
http://www.dagbladet.no/2016/05/28/n...tikk/44371919/
But what news from my union chums, the ones held in such contempt by the German based Kjos mouthpiece and purveyor of Norwegian snake-oil;
December 8, AFL-CIO union, TTD – Press Release:
http://ttd.org/news-and-media/press-...dministration/
“WASHINGTON, DC — Transportation union leaders across all sectors gathered today for their post-election meeting to assess the landscape in Washington and lay the groundwork for a unified effort under a Trump Administration.
“Our discussion today was focused on boosting investment in transportation and protecting the rights of working people against a torrent of political attacks designed to weaken unions,” said Edward Wytkind, president of the Transportation Trades Department, AFL-CIO(TTD).
“We also vowed to defend against assaults on labor and safety protections in our laws, and work with those who want to change American trade policy so it aligns with the economic interests of American workers.”
The Executive Committee took aim at the wrongheaded decision by the U.S. Department of Transportation to approve the controversial application of Norwegian Air International (NAI) for a foreign air carrier permit.
“Transportation unions were clear today in their resolve to stop the first-ever job-killing ‘flag-of-convenience’ airline sanctioned by our government from destroying U.S. airline jobs. We will continue urging President Obama to intervene and reverse the NAI decision,” Wytkind said”
transportation unions were clear today in their resolve to stop the first-ever job-killing ‘flag-of-convenience’ airline sanctioned by our government from destroying U.S. airline jobs.
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yeah, that FedEx has a base in CGN, and runs internal EU operations using N-registered aircraft, really disgusts me. I am a dual US-EU national, so I have split loyalties. But I know for certain if an EU cargo company set up a US crew base and flew internal US operations using EU registered aircraft, the US unions would be screaming bloody murder.
if an EU cargo company set up a US crew base and flew internal US operations using EU registered aircraft, the US unions would be screaming bloody murder.
When we (europe) land in de USofA we can fly to another US base but we CANNOT take extra freight from "B" to take to "C"...(not 1 kg..)..
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: USA
Age: 37
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yeah, that FedEx has a base in CGN, and runs internal EU operations using N-registered aircraft, really disgusts me. I am a dual US-EU national, so I have split loyalties. But I know for certain if an EU cargo company set up a US crew base and flew internal US operations using EU registered aircraft, the US unions would be screaming bloody murder.
The EU and US carriers both have 5th freedom rights so if any carrier wanted to open a US base with European crew they are more than welcome to fly to Canada, Mexico, any other nearby country.....just like FedEx does.
The argument from us isn't over those rights. It's over NAIs flag of convenience model and in regards to flight crew.
2nd year FedEx FO pay and benefits blowNorwegian CAPTAIN pay out of the water. So I don't know why you would bemoan a company that keeps flying "in house" and pays pilots exceedingly well compared to almost every other company on the planet. Instead come negotiation time I would take their contract and slide it across the table.
Last edited by g-code; 11th Dec 2016 at 03:14.
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: north of barlu
Posts: 6,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Direct Bondi
You seem to have a lot invested in this thread and this begs the Question why ?
Have you worked for a part of the Norwegian group ?
Did they ask you to leave ?
As I said on a previous post not a lot of dogs hang on to a bone this long and you motivation interests me as much as the content of your posts.
Have you worked for a part of the Norwegian group ?
Did they ask you to leave ?
As I said on a previous post not a lot of dogs hang on to a bone this long and you motivation interests me as much as the content of your posts.
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: FL450
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I too would like to know the answers to A and C 's questions Direct Bondi. And before you get defensive I am not disagreeing with you , I would just like to know why you have such an invested interest....
There are other LCC within the EU who have much much worse pay conditions and some make there pilots pay for their own uniform- so why not take a shot in that direction also?????
Regards,
SAR
There are other LCC within the EU who have much much worse pay conditions and some make there pilots pay for their own uniform- so why not take a shot in that direction also?????
Regards,
SAR
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sydney
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not much of a defense for the Norwegian regime A and C.
With your 5,885 posts it is apparent you spend a vast amount of time on this website. It is neither my concern nor interest why. Similarly, the causes I choose to pursue, or not to pursue, is none of your concern.
Unfortunately, the Norwegian bone has a never ending supply of meat. Reports of Norwegian’s operational incongruities and “labor relations” issues appear regularly.
Readers can decide for themselves any relevance and value from my contributions to this thread.
With your 5,885 posts it is apparent you spend a vast amount of time on this website. It is neither my concern nor interest why. Similarly, the causes I choose to pursue, or not to pursue, is none of your concern.
Unfortunately, the Norwegian bone has a never ending supply of meat. Reports of Norwegian’s operational incongruities and “labor relations” issues appear regularly.
Readers can decide for themselves any relevance and value from my contributions to this thread.
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Limbo
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Regarding pay on Norwegian LH. Lets say you started out as an FO 3 years ago on LH. You just upgraded to captain on the osm contract year 1. Monthly pay :
Basic 8125 £
Per diems 913 £
Lets assume 89 hrs for the month and 4 unused standby duties : 4091 £
Total : 13129 £ plus pension comes in at 5 percent.
Assume a 4th year FO who failed his upgrade and on a OSM contract : Monthly pay 7852 £ plus 5 percent pension..
On initiating contract you provide a bank guarantee(ie no money up front) and are free to walk after 3 years
Im no Kjos apologetics, but is this really such a bad pay that the airline should be denied a permit?
Basic 8125 £
Per diems 913 £
Lets assume 89 hrs for the month and 4 unused standby duties : 4091 £
Total : 13129 £ plus pension comes in at 5 percent.
Assume a 4th year FO who failed his upgrade and on a OSM contract : Monthly pay 7852 £ plus 5 percent pension..
On initiating contract you provide a bank guarantee(ie no money up front) and are free to walk after 3 years
Im no Kjos apologetics, but is this really such a bad pay that the airline should be denied a permit?
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Manchester
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No it is not. I have heard that their finance rates are much much higher than the average because they haven't been around for long enough in LH to warrant decent rates. This plus the rising oil price and weakening economy should put a stop to them.
Excellent news all round.
Excellent news all round.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Midlands
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Regarding pay on Norwegian LH. Lets say you started out as an FO 3 years ago on LH. You just upgraded to captain on the osm contract year 1. Monthly pay :
Basic 8125 £
Per diems 913 £
Lets assume 89 hrs for the month and 4 unused standby duties : 4091 £
Total : 13129 £ plus pension comes in at 5 percent.
Assume a 4th year FO who failed his upgrade and on a OSM contract : Monthly pay 7852 £ plus 5 percent pension..
On initiating contract you provide a bank guarantee(ie no money up front) and are free to walk after 3 years
Im no Kjos apologetics, but is this really such a bad pay that the airline should be denied a permit?
Basic 8125 £
Per diems 913 £
Lets assume 89 hrs for the month and 4 unused standby duties : 4091 £
Total : 13129 £ plus pension comes in at 5 percent.
Assume a 4th year FO who failed his upgrade and on a OSM contract : Monthly pay 7852 £ plus 5 percent pension..
On initiating contract you provide a bank guarantee(ie no money up front) and are free to walk after 3 years
Im no Kjos apologetics, but is this really such a bad pay that the airline should be denied a permit?
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Up north
Posts: 1,657
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There are other LCC within the EU who have much much worse pay conditions and some make there pilots pay for their own uniform- so why not take a shot in that direction also?????
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Lets assume 89 hrs for the month and 4 unused standby duties : 4091 £
Total : 13129 £ plus pension comes in at 5 percent.
So a year 1 Captain (UK based) grosses over £13k a month?
How do you get to £4091 for flying pay?
Genuinely interested. Cheers
Total : 13129 £ plus pension comes in at 5 percent.
So a year 1 Captain (UK based) grosses over £13k a month?
How do you get to £4091 for flying pay?
Genuinely interested. Cheers
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Spain
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I got the contract from Rishworth and there is no flightpay at all.
Just basic plus per diem.
Basic minus 35% tax, that is what you get.
Very curious how you get to £4000 flightpay?
Cheers
Just basic plus per diem.
Basic minus 35% tax, that is what you get.
Very curious how you get to £4000 flightpay?
Cheers
