Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Terms and Endearment
Reload this Page >

BA Direct Entry Pilot.

Terms and Endearment The forum the bean counters hoped would never happen. Your news on pay, rostering, allowances, extras and negotiations where you work - scheduled, charter or contract.

BA Direct Entry Pilot.

Old 17th Nov 2015, 10:27
  #2101 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Scotland
Posts: 890
Received 6 Likes on 2 Posts
You cannot influence any of it so the answer is irrelevant. All you can do is be patient and see what happens. Why worry about it or upset yourself if the answer is not to your liking?
I rather understand Rex's interest. Since entering the hold pool 3 months ago, there has been absolutely no information beyond an email sent to some asking them to clarify their hours and 2016 offers are being contemplated.

For those of us at regionals and low costs this is a massive move for us, our wives (or husbands) and families. I think a lot of us are understandably nervous and attempting to clarify the process given that all we really have to go on at the moment are rumours posted on here. Recent world events have reminded us that despite BA's recruitment plans, nothing is certain and all we really want is information to soothe our nerves!
Jwscud is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2015, 21:14
  #2102 (permalink)  

PPRuNe Person
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: see roster
Posts: 1,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would be rather miffed , if having recently applied and being told that only the A320 was available, and having signed up (complete with 5 years freeze) to find my buddy applying this week and getting offered B777 or even A380 !
Your hypothetical new A320 joiner may need to prepare to be miffed, from what I hear...
overstress is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2015, 00:48
  #2103 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 1,447
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: sim slots. Mate had interview Monday, telephone call Tuesday with sim date early December.
Megaton is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2015, 12:32
  #2104 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Uk
Age: 42
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Miffed? Having recently joined on the 320!

Try telling that to guys who have been on the bus for more than 5 years and by the latest indications will be denied any transfer whilst DEP go straight to LH.

The feeling of entitlement by some is amazing.
bex88 is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2015, 13:11
  #2105 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Winchester
Posts: 6,545
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts


Because of the internet and certainly the info available here BA's ruleset(s) should be well known. On and off, feast, then famine, only entries on one fleet..then everything opens up...or doesn't......

Because of this some were miffed when they misjudged things in the early 90's and got stuck on the classic 747 for years, some got stuck and miffed at LGW, most Flight Engineers got very miffed after 9/11........... One thing is for sure, you're not even in the game until you've got a seniority number, and you only get that by signing for the seat you've been offered.....

fly4more..if you think that selection strategy, if true, is an example BA being devious I've got news for you.......they can be much more devious than that
wiggy is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2015, 16:00
  #2106 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Scotland
Posts: 890
Received 6 Likes on 2 Posts
Hold pool update went out today:

- If you have 2000tt incl 1000 Jet>25t or Tp>50t you may expect a long haul call

- If you have an A320 rating expect a call for that, even if you meet above requirements. All A320 slots are FPP or type rated recruitment at the moment

No offers will be made to anyone who does not meet either of the above criteria at this time. Given BA were publicly stating to all who went through selection this summer that jobs would be available to all who passed this is another boot for anyone flying regional or turboprop types!
Jwscud is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2015, 16:28
  #2107 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Under the table
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"at this time" does not mean "for the forseeable future" though...
Stocious is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2015, 16:32
  #2108 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Home
Posts: 3,399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bex88

The feeling of entitlement by some is amazing.
Oh the irony......


Why on earth has the airline industry got itself into the position that length of time in a job has somehow equated to worth of an individual?

Because you have been in BA for a while does that make you better?

How childish.
Tourist is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2015, 16:41
  #2109 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Botswana
Posts: 887
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tourist to be fair on this one - and I am one of the hold pool guys who is wanting to take advantage of this situation and get a long haul slot - I actually fully agree with Bex. If a type rated guy (and regardless of their number of hours on type) is coming in and taking a slot ahead of someone who's now completed their engagement freeze and making an aspirational bid for long haul then (possibly) fair enough. But this is potentially not what is going on.

You could have two guys with the same type rating (or not, neither is type rated on the fleet being recruited for - it doesn't matter) and the same number of hours, the only difference being one is a DEP and one is someone who is a company employee and has served the company for five years. Both applying for a long haul slot. The external guy gets it.

Are you seriously telling me you'd be happy with that or that anyone in any other industry or workplace would be happy if the external (and equal) candidate denies someone in the company their promotion???

Really???
RexBanner is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2015, 18:35
  #2110 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Uk
Age: 42
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't think I mentioned anywhere that time served meant you were better or worse than anyone else.

The one thing these guys all have is a seniority number a track record within BA and an investment in the company. If you don't agree with the way we do things then don't come.

The truth is this. Pilots on SH with valid bids are having their career aspirations suppressed. Yes it's temporary and in our system they will be more senior than the new guys on LH so it will balance out in time.

BA has a way of working and when you join you accept that. You start at the bottom and work your way up. That gives you the right to then prove you are suitable for a position, not the right to that position. Many of these guys getting held on the bus have spent years close to or at the bottom taking the the crap. Now it's turning around these same guys are being excluded from the benefits. It is then when you hear about new guys just in or guys yet to join talking about being miffed that you can't help but . Yes you will say how hard it's been elsewhere but we are not talking about elsewhere we are talking about here. DEP onto LH is only supposed to occur when there are a lack of suitable internal candidates. That is not the case. There is a problem with training capacity and finding enough Airbus pilots of a suitable standard to BA to allow these guys to move fleet.

De furmo in flammam. Please do come air your views on our way of doing things in the crew room. I am sure it will be listened to with great interest
bex88 is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2015, 19:05
  #2111 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Button Moon
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My advice to hold pool swimmers would be to get your foot in the door and your name on the seniority list, then worry about your fleet later (if it's not the one you want from day one). Nowhere's perfect, BA included, but if you're joining for a specific fleet then you're missing the big picture of what BA offers.

Just to add to what Bex has said above, if you don't like the way BA does things then don't apply. It's a big seniority machine where the computers have names and the people have numbers. But despite its downsides, BA is still better than most airlines out there. If you don't agree then save your days off for something more pleasant than computer tests and interviews.
2 Whites 2 Reds is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2015, 19:24
  #2112 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Uk
Age: 42
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You do make a fair point but it's a system to which you choose to join or not. I am no defender of our rostering and have had a worse deal than most in that respect. What I would say is this. Under normal circumstances you quickly achieve some choice and control over your life and that is far far better than any system I know. The stories of champagne lines of work being picked by the most senior is not strictly true. Lines are pre constructed at stage one so you can't pick with 100% control.

If you want to complain and be vocal about it once your here then do it quietly because you won't find any support to change it and you will probably come round to its merits after a little while.
bex88 is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2015, 19:31
  #2113 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Button Moon
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Those with a very much nicer roster than mine have served their time with years of crap rosters and little control over their lives. Ever seen 'Layer Cake"? in the words of Eddie Temple.....

"You're born, you take ****. You get out in the world, you take more ****. You climb a little higher, you take less ****. Till one day you're up in the rarefied atmosphere and you've forgotten what **** even looks like. Welcome to the layer cake son."

I say the above as someone planted firmly at the bottom of the master seniority list, currently taking said s***.
2 Whites 2 Reds is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2015, 21:04
  #2114 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bex88
The truth is this. Pilots on SH with valid bids are having their career aspirations suppressed. Yes it's temporary and in our system they will be more senior than the new guys on LH so it will balance out in time.
I am under the impression that the seniority numbers for fleet transfers in 2016 include all eligible un-frozen SH pilots with a bid in. That number isn't sufficient to fill the LH seats so there has to be DEP LH recruitment. I don't quite know how the land lies on the 767 but I believe un-frozen pilots on that fleet are being held back, in my view unfairly, from fleet moves.

Not sure if anything is being done this year that's been done any different any other year.
DVR6K is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2015, 21:36
  #2115 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Under the table
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
DVR6K, this isn't about sticking to their freeze guns. Just ask the guys who had their freezes waived this year to get SH commands. They could easily choose to waive Engagement freezes, and recruit all newbies onto the 320, which would please all those SH P2 who are waiting patiently LH and massively boost morale in the same blow. It wouldn't please the training dept though, who then potentially have to do two courses instead of one.

Make no mistake, this is not about choosing to get the best pilot or the most experienced, or the most anything into BA Longhaul, nor is it a way of sticking to the freeze promise. This is a cost game, nothing more, nothing less.
Stocious is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2015, 21:49
  #2116 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Stocious
DVR6K, this isn't about sticking to their freeze guns. Just ask the guys who had their freezes waived this year to get SH commands. They could easily choose to waive Engagement freezes, and recruit all newbies onto the 320, which would please all those SH P2 who are waiting patiently LH and massively boost morale in the same blow. It wouldn't please the training dept though, who then potentially have to do two courses instead of one.

Make no mistake, this is not about choosing to get the best pilot or the most experienced, or the most anything into BA Longhaul, nor is it a way of sticking to the freeze promise. This is a cost game, nothing more, nothing less.
You're absolutely right. Cost is King as the march towards record profits continues. It ain't right but it's the IAG way. If they don't have to unfreeze people they won't. It's not rewarding company loyalty but when did that ever matter to them?

Ex-BMI Airbus guys leapfrogging frozen Airbus guys onto LH. Now we're talking unfair. But what can you do?
DVR6K is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2015, 21:56
  #2117 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: uk
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
with the seniority list in BA is that one guy will have a massively worse roster than another, simply because he or she is more junior. To old hands, that might seem reasonable, but not in the modern world of employment.
You're missing the point.

Without some kind of bidding system no-one will ever get anything they want
(time off or destinations) , whereas the company can roster as it likes to EASA limits.

It seems to me the modern world you refer to is zero hours contracts and no protection from ruthless employers.

I know which i'd rather have!
The Blu Riband is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2015, 22:09
  #2118 (permalink)  
Junior trash
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 1,025
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There are many the whole way up the seniority list who have not got what they bid for because they are in type freezes.

BA have always recruited DEP to LH, and generally held people to freezes. None of this should be a surprise. It's not like they're holding anyone back (on the 320) which I imagine BA would dearly like to.

What you're arguing for is zero freezes at all. ie: If someone junior (in this case it happens to be DEPs) get a move to a fleet you bid for then so should you regardless of any freeze. Not enjoying the 747 you bid for last year? Doesn't matter, you can bid onto the 380/777 anytime you like because someone junior but unfrozen got it.

Why is the engagement freeze a special case?

Secondly where is the sim and training pilot capacity going to come from for these extra few hundred A320 courses you just created? They're already outsourcing a fair chunk of the work to CTC as we don't have enough sims or IRE/TREmfor this level of movement.
Hotel Mode is offline  
Old 19th Nov 2015, 10:17
  #2119 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For starters I do realize that different people have different problems, but here's mine: Since the email about no NTR 320 courses will be available went out yesterday I'm potentially stuck on a turboprop for a no future company earning barely half the entry level wage of a BA anything pilot even though I've had years and years in my company. Why? Because even though I'm high up the hold pool list I got leapfrogged by people with a rating (which I do understand), but more importantly by people with a rating who initially failed in different stages of the recruitment but got called back to retake just parts of it even though I worked hard and managed to pass everything straight off the bat...

I get that it's a cost thing and I get that it's a training capacity thing, but it sure feels more unfair and more of a problem than someone being off because of the fact that they were offered 320 and someone they know got straight in to LH. Perspective, people.... I'll be very disappointed for a while for sure since my career goal was about to be fulfilled, but hopefully the "this situation may, however, change" will come in to force sooner rather than later.
OttoMatic is offline  
Old 19th Nov 2015, 11:00
  #2120 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The Back of Beyond
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh bloody hell. Cry me a river
Flying Clog is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.