Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Terms and Endearment
Reload this Page >

BA Direct Entry Pilot.

Wikiposts
Search
Terms and Endearment The forum the bean counters hoped would never happen. Your news on pay, rostering, allowances, extras and negotiations where you work - scheduled, charter or contract.

BA Direct Entry Pilot.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th Sep 2018, 23:20
  #5021 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: England
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You say don't shoot the messenger, but I am locked and loaded! That's total nonsense.
Icarus1981 is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2018, 00:32
  #5022 (permalink)  
.89
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: U.K.
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nope, it’s true. Although I think it’s quite a new thing.

As it was explained to me at the sim, BA have had some people struggle with a new type and they think it’s partly down to the infrequent nature of LH flying.

So in the sim they will assess how quickly you adapt to an unfamiliar type, the speed at which you learn and take in information, spare capacity, accuracy of flying etc...

At the end end of the sim the instructor will tick a box on your report whether they think you’re suitable for long haul, or whether they think you’ll benefit from some time with more regular sectors.

Also there was the caveat that if you get sent short haul, it doesn’t mean you failed the longhaul assessment, probably just that they need short haul people at the minute!

Its clearly not about flying skills as I got LH!

Its all explained when they go through the power point before the sim. Don’t lose sleep over it!
.89 is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2018, 06:44
  #5023 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well I'm not going to lay awake tonight worrying about your gun, I'm just telling you what he told me.
Reversethrustset is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2018, 07:17
  #5024 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Home
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by wiggy


In the context of the ex-military guys (and to partly answer the question posed by skaterboi) that’s not always been the case on Longhaul. FWIW earlier this year I flew with one ex-Voyager, very very new DEP on the 777.
Wiggy is correct. Ex RAF Voyager Pilots recently DEP on to 777. And previously also direct to the A380.
cessnapete is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2018, 07:45
  #5025 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Scotland
Posts: 891
Received 6 Likes on 2 Posts
I stand corrected.

The “suitable for long haul” policy has also been confirmed internally and has, to say the least, generated a bit of controversy. It was supposed to address a few training failures which are now being “solved” through selection rather than squeezing everyone through a minimum footprint course then immediately putting people under all sorts of extra pressure if 6 landings and 8 approaches with bonus jet lag (you probably haven’t mastered controlled rest yet either) isn’t enough for you to get to grips with your first heavy jet in the real world.
Jwscud is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2018, 07:58
  #5026 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Winchester
Posts: 6,548
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Jwscud
I stand corrected. The “suitable for long haul” policy has also been confirmed internally...

If it’s any consolation the fact that such a policy actually exists on a formal basis is news to me as well, though I can see why: for the reasons you have stated.
wiggy is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2018, 11:59
  #5027 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Uk
Age: 42
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Suitable for LH??!!!! I would have liked someone suitable for SH last week. Every approach back into LHR and some up north were all in and around the 25-30kt range gusting up to 39. It’s fine having a policy but if we are sending the weaker candidates to SH it’s not a great idea in my opinion. More junior commands, more junior FO’s. I don’t mind saying it but when it was gusting 35 across it was the most I had had to deal with until now.
bex88 is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2018, 13:41
  #5028 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bex88
Suitable for LH??!!!! I would have liked someone suitable for SH last week. Every approach back into LHR and some up north were all in and around the 25-30kt range gusting up to 39. It’s fine having a policy but if we are sending the weaker candidates to SH it’s not a great idea in my opinion. More junior commands, more junior FO’s. I don’t mind saying it but when it was gusting 35 across it was the most I had had to deal with until now.
The idea I guess is that pilots will have more chance to develop their flying skills in SH than LH : more approaches, more landings, more briefings with less time (LHR-MAN is a good example), etc.

Personally, I think this is not the real reason. It is just a very convenient way for BA to "force" people to go to SH. They must be fed up with people refusing their SH offer because they know they'll be offered LH if they wait.
VinceR is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2018, 14:26
  #5029 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Winchester
Posts: 6,548
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by VinceR
...They must be fed up with people refusing their SH offer because they know they'll be offered LH if they wait.
That sounds like a bit of a high risk strategy - how often does it work?


Last edited by wiggy; 27th Sep 2018 at 15:01. Reason: like added
wiggy is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2018, 14:49
  #5030 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by wiggy


That sounds a bit of a high risk strategy - how often does it work?
The only thing I know for sure is it worked. People preferred losing a bit on seniority to start directly on LH. Some rumors say that BA is now by far more strict on that. They clearly say that a "no" will be final (no more offer).
Rumor to be confirmed though.
VinceR is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2018, 15:12
  #5031 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by VinceR
Rumor to be confirmed though.
Consider it confirmed. You get one email with an offer and 24hrs to reply with a yes. Turn it down or don’t reply and you get kicked out the holding pool.

Getting a ‘recommended for LH’ definitely does not mean that’s what you’re going to get offered
zero/zero is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2018, 15:33
  #5032 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: U.K.
Posts: 401
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Friend of mine, <2000 hours, no unfrozen ATPL.. airbus TR. Straight on the 777
TheAirMission is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2018, 15:46
  #5033 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: on your 6
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TheAirMission
Friend of mine, <2000 hours, no unfrozen ATPL.. airbus TR. Straight on the 777
how recent was this?
reeko is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2018, 17:22
  #5034 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: uk
Age: 55
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Couple of things come out from the company recently, you can only go LH if you have an unfrozen ATPL (and fairly unlikely if no “jet time”) and if you turn down your first job offer you are out the pool, no bargaining anymore.

BA will send you where they want you and make offers depending on what positions need filling at that particular time.

Good luck to everyone swimming the quicker you join the less I work.
Icanseeclearly is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2018, 21:21
  #5035 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: U.K.
Posts: 401
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by reeko


how recent was this?
Last month
TheAirMission is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2018, 23:01
  #5036 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Under the table
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TheAirMission
Friend of mine, <2000 hours, no unfrozen ATPL.. airbus TR. Straight on the 777
Need the ATPL by end of TR course though so must have all the requirements met before starting the course.
Stocious is offline  
Old 28th Sep 2018, 11:29
  #5037 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: on your 6
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Stocious
Need the ATPL by end of TR course though so must have all the requirements met before starting the course.
meaning the 1500 hours TT inclusive of x, y & z etc etc?
reeko is offline  
Old 28th Sep 2018, 16:38
  #5038 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Under the table
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by reeko


meaning the 1500 hours TT inclusive of x, y & z etc etc?
Yes, the ATPL skills test will be done during the TR course LST, with a requirement to apply for it as soon as possible after. Otherwise they can't do APIC duties.
Stocious is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2018, 11:28
  #5039 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Sky
Posts: 501
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Guys, how much do the verbal reasoning and TCAS test on latestpilotjobs reflect regarding the real test at Waterside? The verbal test seems to be a 100% miss..
captain.weird is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2018, 11:46
  #5040 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: uk
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good friend,Sim early September,positive result to hold pool,A320 rated.Posted 777 Jan
Phantom4 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.