![]() |
A321XLR Performance
Will the 321XLR have better Takeoff and cruise performance than the 321neo? The 321neo seems to be very restrictive in temps greater then 30. And if you have a RWY that is only about 2,500m its almost better the be in an A320neo than an A321neo. Then there is the cruise performance issue, of only being able to climb to 30,000ft at high weights and being stuck there for several hours deviating around weather, while other aircraft at flying above it.
|
Well I think we will see the everyday performance capabilities, once it will fly regularly
|
Originally Posted by 4Reds
(Post 11706011)
Will the 321XLR have better Takeoff and cruise performance than the 321neo?.
|
Originally Posted by Amadis of Gaul
(Post 11715807)
Why would it? It's neither lighter, nor more powerful.
|
It has a modified high lift system, different flap positions and different FBW software that could result in improved take off performance.
|
Originally Posted by Less Hair
(Post 11715852)
It has a modified high lift system, different flap positions and different FBW software that could result in improved take off performance.
|
Originally Posted by 4Reds
(Post 11706011)
Will the 321XLR have better Takeoff and cruise performance than the 321neo? The 321neo seems to be very restrictive in temps greater then 30. And if you have a RWY that is only about 2,500m its almost better the be in an A320neo than an A321neo. Then there is the cruise performance issue, of only being able to climb to 30,000ft at high weights and being stuck there for several hours deviating around weather, while other aircraft at flying above it.
|
Originally Posted by 4Reds
(Post 11706011)
The 321neo seems to be very restrictive in temps greater then 30.
Originally Posted by 4Reds
(Post 11706011)
And if you have a RWY that is only about 2,500m its almost better the be in an A320neo than an A321neo.
Originally Posted by 4Reds
(Post 11706011)
Then there is the cruise performance issue, of only being able to climb to 30,000ft at high weights and being stuck there for several hours deviating around weather, while other aircraft at flying above it.
|
Originally Posted by 4Reds
(Post 11706011)
Will the 321XLR have better Takeoff and cruise performance than the 321neo? The 321neo seems to be very restrictive in temps greater then 30. And if you have a RWY that is only about 2,500m its almost better the be in an A320neo than an A321neo. Then there is the cruise performance issue, of only being able to climb to 30,000ft at high weights and being stuck there for several hours deviating around weather, while other aircraft at flying above it.
|
Originally Posted by homebuilt
(Post 11760841)
About cruise altitude after a MTOW take-off, reminds me the good old B747.;) I remember the B747-300, with which I flew the first 2 or 3 hours at FL280 after taking-off with 580 pax from ORY to LAX or from RUN to ORY..
|
Originally Posted by IZH
(Post 11760195)
Wich aircraft would be able to climb higher in this case? For sure not the A321ceo. Climbing up to flightlevel 370 or 390 with the A321neo close to max TOW was the norm, whilst the old 321ceo would have been stuck at 310 or maybe 330 all the way.
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 14:00. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.