![]() |
Brake Cooling A320
I’m new to the Airbus, having previously flown Boeing and other types.
Since there is no brake cooling table, is there a particular technique to work out whether I should be landing with max reverse to limit brake temps? I want to use idle reverse as much as possible but I don’t want the brakes to be amber by the time I push back / reach the runway. For info: Our fleet DOES NOT have brake fans and the turnaround times vary from 45 minutes to 1 hour. Any help would be much appreciated. |
This article may be useful:
https://safetyfirst.airbus.com/take-...f-your-brakes/ New-ish to Airbus (1000 hrs now) but still learning, I have used the Airbus Safety First site many times |
You can find the tables in the MEL at the brake temp indicator item,
don’t have my ipad with me so can’t be more specific |
it's essential to assess the ambient temperature.
When conditions are particularly warm outside, brake temperatures tend to heat up more rapidly and using maximum reverse thrust may help decrease them significantly. Under such circumstances, using maximum reverse thrust may also be beneficial in order to help lower temperatures during landing and reduce brake temperatures further. However, in cooler environments you should switch to idle reverse thrust to reduce wear on the brakes and ensure they won't overheat by the time your plane lands or you reach its runway destination. Considerations should be given when planning for turnaround times of 45 minutes to 1 hour, in which parking in shaded areas would prevent excessive heat build-up, with parking brake released until just prior to pushback for airflow around brakes and tires. Communicate your brake cooling concerns to the ground crew. They might be able to provide additional cooling measures like using water carts during turnarounds to spray cool water over your brakes for added cooling effects. |
Out of curiosity, why don’t you want to use max reverse? My previous company had no brake fans either. The only way to keep the brakes cool enough for the quick turns was with a lot of reverse.
|
Happens quite often. Rev max will reduce brk temp if autobrake used. I usually advise tower that I’ll use further rw exit. No auto brk and Manual breaking below 100 knots will greatly reduce the brk temp.
|
Originally Posted by revida
(Post 11455625)
They might be able to provide additional cooling measures like using water carts during turnarounds to spray cool water over your brakes for added cooling effects.
|
Originally Posted by iggy
(Post 11455886)
I've always heard that carbon brakes don't do well with water splashing on them...
|
Originally Posted by Odins Raven
(Post 11455128)
I’m new to the Airbus, having previously flown Boeing and other types.
Since there is no brake cooling table, is there a particular technique to work out whether I should be landing with max reverse to limit brake temps? I want to use idle reverse as much as possible but I don’t want the brakes to be amber by the time I push back / reach the runway. For info: Our fleet DOES NOT have brake fans and the turnaround times vary from 45 minutes to 1 hour. Any help would be much appreciated. use Max Rev as much as possible, one engine taxi in/out. Also consider extending the Landing Gear a little earlier to land with cool brakes; this is quite helpful when doing multiple short sectors. That’s basically all you can do to keep your brakes cool. When taking off with brakes close to the limit, do not leave the gear down to cool it down, unless you want to hear from flight safety. That’s a very bad habit some people have but it’s not a procedure unless dictated by MEL requirements (one brake u/s). If you get a brakes hot ECAM after takeoff, which you probably will when taking off close to the 300, comply with it. Watch out for gear speed limits for retraction once cooled. Get the gear down early in approach and try to touchdown with brakes below 100. |
Originally Posted by revida
(Post 11455990)
Carbon brakes used on aircraft such as A320 aircraft can indeed be vulnerable to water splashing. When water comes in contact with hot carbon brakes, it may trigger thermal shock; when this happens it causes carbon material cracking or delaminating which compromises their performance and safety.
As water can splash onto brakes during wet or rainy conditions, being extra cautious to decrease thermal shock risks is key to protecting them from being overburdened with liquid. Here are a few strategies for doing just that. Taxiing and takeoff: Be wary of large puddles or areas with standing water on the runway; whenever possible, opt for dryer sections when possible. Landing Technique: After landing, avoid excessive braking until the aircraft has decelerated and its wheels have spun enough to clear away any water accumulation on its brakes. This can be accomplished using gradual brake pressure initially before gradually increasing it as wheels rotate more quickly. Once on the ground, keep the brakes lightly applied while taxiing so airflow can help cool them down, helping evaporate any residual moisture and keeping your brakes within their safe temperature range. |
Is the idea that manual braking keeps brake temps lower compared to Auto Brake just anecdotal or is there anything from Airbus to suggest so?
|
Originally Posted by Superpilot
(Post 11456381)
Is the idea that manual braking keeps brake temps lower compared to Auto Brake just anecdotal or is there anything from Airbus to suggest so?
|
Originally Posted by revida
(Post 11455625)
Communicate your brake cooling concerns to the ground crew. They might be able to provide additional cooling measures like using water carts during turnarounds to spray cool water over your brakes for added cooling effects.
|
Once on the ground, keep the brakes lightly applied while taxiing so airflow can help cool them down, helping evaporate any residual moisture and keeping your brakes within their safe temperature range.
What utter rubbish! |
Originally Posted by Hey m8
(Post 11456551)
It’s a common sense. You start using brakes at lower speed, you have lower brakes temp as a result.
|
Originally Posted by Superpilot
(Post 11457051)
Hardly a fair comparison!
|
The point is if you brake manually within 2 seconds of touch down in the exact same way as the Autobrake, the brake temperatures are going to be exactly the same. There are people who believe that just by pushing a button, you are destined for hotter brakes. When comparing, at least make it a level playing field.
|
Originally Posted by Superpilot
(Post 11457321)
The point is if you brake manually within 2 seconds of touch down in the exact same way as the Autobrake, the brake temperatures are going to be exactly the same. There are people who believe that just by pushing a button, you are destined for hotter brakes. When comparing, at least make it a level playing field.
|
All good in theory but lots of airports have runway occupancy procedures that mean you don’t have the luxury of waiting to slow down before applying the brakes.
|
You shouldn’t have to give everyone whiplash just to satisfy runway occupancy times.
|
Low auto brake shouldn’t be giving anyone whiplash.
|
Originally Posted by Odins Raven
(Post 11455128)
I’m new to the Airbus, having previously flown Boeing and other types.
Since there is no brake cooling table, is there a particular technique to work out whether I should be landing with max reverse to limit brake temps? I want to use idle reverse as much as possible but I don’t want the brakes to be amber by the time I push back / reach the runway. For info: Our fleet DOES NOT have brake fans and the turnaround times vary from 45 minutes to 1 hour. Any help would be much appreciated. Wether to use max reverse is a judgment call. If you’re looking at a short runway, heavy aircraft (medium auto brake/flap full), and a 45 min turn, then max reverse will help the brakes. |
Jonty, I had a similar experience to you for the best part of 15 years. Then it happened. Where I least expected it. Smaller airports with short runways actually give us better control over managing hot brakes. Ludicrous airport layouts like Barcelona where you can be parked on the far side of the airport only to then have to taxi around the entire perimeter of the airport before you can depart (runway crossings not allowed) are the real culprit. 10 brake applications from 30-10 Kts (our company doesn't allow single engine taxi out) on a 30 degree day without brake fans will give you hot brakes at line up.
|
Originally Posted by Hey m8
(Post 11457348)
Now I see. I’m saying exactly the same. That’s why I suggest to use manual braking at lower speed (below 100 kts) and not to use autobrake. Looks like you misunderstood me
|
If you're landing somewhere long enough to have the luxury of delaying brake application until 70 knots then brake cooling is never going to be an issue anyway. Try landing in 1900m and get back to me.
|
Originally Posted by Smooth Airperator
(Post 11457619)
Jonty, I had a similar experience to you for the best part of 15 years. Then it happened. Where I least expected it. Smaller airports with short runways actually give us better control over managing hot brakes. Ludicrous airport layouts like Barcelona where you can be parked on the far side of the airport only to then have to taxi around the entire perimeter of the airport before you can depart (runway crossings not allowed) are the real culprit. 10 brake applications from 30-10 Kts (our company doesn't allow single engine taxi out) on a 30 degree day without brake fans will give you hot brakes at line up.
|
Originally Posted by AerocatS2A
(Post 11462021)
If you're landing somewhere long enough to have the luxury of delaying brake application until 70 knots then brake cooling is never going to be an issue anyway. Try landing in 1900m and get back to me.
|
Originally Posted by Amadis of Gaul
(Post 11462079)
Sounds like LGA to me. Same technique, except when landing a heavy 321, in which case it's medium autobrakes until the reverser rev up, then autobrakes off until 70kts then feet on the brakes again. Won't keep them under 200C, but under 300C-350C for sure. By the time we deplane 228 people and board up another 228, things will have cooled down nicely.
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 07:06. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.