![]() |
Unreliable Speed A320
Hello friends,
quick one on this. We had the scenario in January which was: ADR 1 totally inop, ADR 2 speed unreliable and altitude ok, ADR3 inop. So the checklist asks for identifying the affected ADR. Ok, all three are actually unreliable. BUT ADR2 has a valid Altitude which can be used and makes it much easier. So why does Airbus say you have to switch it of? Because of the warnings related to the unreliable speed on adr2? Otherwise you could keep it running? Thanks so much SW |
Depending on aircraft capabilities (BUSS, DBUS), there are some differences. But typically you keep one Adr on to prevent flight control laws from using the bad ADR data, in which case you can keep ADR 2 on and then off 1 & 3. On aircraft with the BUSS you turn off all ADRs below FL250 and the altitude is replaced by the GPS altitude.
|
Originally Posted by Speedwinner
(Post 11417152)
Hello friends,
quick one on this. We had the scenario in January which was: ADR 1 totally inop, ADR 2 speed unreliable and altitude ok, ADR3 inop. So the checklist asks for identifying the affected ADR. Ok, all three are actually unreliable. BUT ADR2 has a valid Altitude which can be used and makes it much easier. So why does Airbus say you have to switch it of? Because of the warnings related to the unreliable speed on adr2? Otherwise you could keep it running? Thanks so much SW |
X-Check with GPS Altitude plus radar readout. so static ports were not involved. So keep it on?
|
Originally Posted by Speedwinner
(Post 11417312)
X-Check with GPS Altitude plus radar readout. so static ports were not involved. So keep it on?
|
And if it has no buss system? I would switch off a reliable alt indication…
|
Originally Posted by Speedwinner
(Post 11417472)
And if it has no buss system? I would switch off a reliable alt indication…
|
Get below 10,000', bleeds off, packs off, open the outflow valve and use cabin alt as an altimeter. Even get a VSI thrown in for nothing. Probably closer to reality than GPS alt. :E
|
Originally Posted by lurkio
(Post 11417694)
Get below 10,000', bleeds off, packs off, open the outflow valve and use cabin alt as an altimeter. Even get a VSI thrown in for nothing. Probably closer to reality than GPS alt. :E
|
Originally Posted by Speedwinner
(Post 11417312)
X-Check with GPS Altitude plus radar readout. so static ports were not involved. So keep it on?
ATC radar cannot measure aircraft Altitude independently - they can only report the transponder altitude data transmitted from the aircraft - which will always agree with one of the onboard altimeters. So there is no X-check there. |
Originally Posted by Goldenrivett
(Post 11417838)
Hi Speedwinner,
ATC radar cannot measure aircraft Altitude independently - they can only report the transponder altitude data transmitted from the aircraft - which will always agree with one of the onboard altimeters. So there is no X-check there. |
Originally Posted by vilas
(Post 11417840)
Yes! There was a fatal accident due to radar altitude.
”The pilots incorrectly believed that they could figure out the actual aircraft altitude by asking the controller, but neither the pilots nor the controller realized that the altitude information displayed on the controller's screen was sent from the aircraft's Mode C Transponder. As the transponder was receiving the same erroneous altitude information being displayed on the aircraft's altimeter, the altitude on the controller's display was also incorrect.” |
Originally Posted by vilas
(Post 11417482)
You needed to provide following information in the original question:Whether aircraft had GPS?Whether aircraft had no BUSS, old BUSS or the new BUSS?since you have GPS but no BUSS you may keep the ADR2 but considering the complexity of the failure possibility of altitude becoming erroneous cannot be ruled out and CM1 doesn't have altitude on PFD anyway. So it's better to use GPS altitude from MCDU GPS page to fly the approach.
Old BUSS /New BUSS !!!!! Can u pls elaborate |
Originally Posted by Rocket3837
(Post 11418238)
Villas,
Old BUSS /New BUSS !!!!! Can u pls elaborate 1. Without Back Up Speed Scale. 2. With irreversible Back Up Speed Scale 3. With reversible Back Up Speed Scale. 4. With Digital Back Up Speed where alternate actual calculated speed replaces pitot static speed. |
Originally Posted by Speedwinner
(Post 11417312)
X-Check with GPS Altitude plus radar readout. so static ports were not involved. So keep it on?
|
Originally Posted by Speedwinner
(Post 11417472)
And if it has no buss system? I would switch off a reliable alt indication…
|
Originally Posted by Fursty Ferret
(Post 11418505)
The problem with this is that all you know is that at that particular moment in time you have an altimeter that agrees with GPS altitude. Air data problems can be quite insidious in that a faulty system can provide seemingly accurate data at one moment in time, at a specific speed and altitude. This is why Airbus recommends that you switch off all three and rely on the BUSS if fitted.
|
Kinda off topic, but practically, what fault would tie these three systems together like this, apart from Static Port blockage?
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 15:34. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.