PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Tech Log (https://www.pprune.org/tech-log-15/)
-   -   A320 Fuel Leak (https://www.pprune.org/tech-log/588038-a320-fuel-leak.html)

Boyington 9th December 2016 13:31

A320 Fuel Leak
 
In the fuel leak procedure for A320 it is stated that No Reversers should be deployed on landing roll. Can someone please explain the reason for this? Thanks

Mascot PPL 9th December 2016 13:46

Don't know the official reason but I would guess that the main issue would be as follows:

1) Fuel leak could be coming from anywhere but wings/engines are prime locations for a leak.

2) In landing run fuel leak will be trailing fuel behind as the plane lands

3) Thrust reversers could/would push fuel (leaked) and air forwards an into the engine intakes. This is likely to cause a flame out of the back and cover the whole airframe in a mixture of fuel and air.

4) Atomised fuel air mixture is explosive/fire risk. In general it's better to leave this behind you than spray it in front of the engines :-)

So all in all probably not a good idea - would guess this applies to all jets with TR and not just the 320.

Just my thoughts - actual reason could be more obscure.

EcamSurprise 9th December 2016 13:47

One reason and one reason only.
It's to allow the TRE to catch you out that you didn't finish reading the whole checklist. :E

Uplinker 9th December 2016 13:53

@ EcamSurprise :ok:

Could they have made that note any smaller?

vilas 9th December 2016 14:04

Yes. The reverse may cause re ingestion of fuel vapour into engine intake. Which is hazardous.

Goldenrivett 9th December 2016 14:45


The reverse may cause re ingestion of fuel vapour into engine intake.
It is more likely to prevent fuel being thrown over the fuselage.
See https://assets.publishing.service.go...988_G-BGJL.pdf 2nd picture.


All times are GMT. The time now is 14:44.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.