![]() |
Question for regulation boffins!
I work for a large european aircraft manufacturer (part 145 organisation) and we are having some lively debate on regulations
If I recieve an assembly, for instance a brake maniolfd from a manufacturer with its corresponding EASA form 1 I then fit said assy onto an aircraft and find that a componant malfunctions, lets say a servo valve. I then trouble shoot and diagnose a faulty servo valve on said assy. If I change that componant, do I then invalidate the EASA form 1, requiring the assy to be replaced? :confused: Please bear in mid that this is not part 21 organisation further the aircraft maintenance manual lists the componant as a replacable part with a procedure to do so. |
I would say the point is moot.
Once the assy is fitted to the a/c the EASA Form 1 has been used and filed. If there is an approved procedure to replace a component then that becomes the authority for certification. I think. :uhoh: |
So to further my question:-
For me, if I diagnose the componant faulty and request the assy manufacturer (issuer of EASA F1) replace that componant IAW CMM, then surely I do not devalidate the EASA form 1 ???? |
As far as I know, if the assy is on your capability list, it shouldn't be a problem to replace part of it.
If not, you'll have to replace the entire assembly. In any case, that's how I understand it, but I might be wrong, of course. |
In my view, using the example given, if the Servo Valve is listed as a replaceable unit, with an AMM procedure for doing so, then it is replaceable IAW AMM no problem.
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 06:04. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.