PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Tech Log (https://www.pprune.org/tech-log-15/)
-   -   Can any non-Russian plane do this? (https://www.pprune.org/tech-log/507667-can-any-non-russian-plane-do.html)

Check Airman 10th February 2013 19:54

Can any non-Russian plane do this?
 

...or is it just a Russian thing? Secondly, has anybody ever done this?

Denti 10th February 2013 20:26

Yes, even in production planes can do that. For example the 737 can open the reversers below 10ft RA. Not recommended at all and bloody dangerous. Still did it in my very early years and it was the smoothest greaser i ever did... If only one opens it is most probably game over.

ITman 10th February 2013 20:46

The DH Trident did this too.

NG1 10th February 2013 20:50

The DC-8 as far as I know.

bubbers44 10th February 2013 21:01

DC 8's could use inboard reversers on descent. Don't know about landings.

Pub User 10th February 2013 21:24

I think the C17 can do it.

Capt Chambo 10th February 2013 23:15

The IL62 can..

(Google Ilyushin IL-62 Cubana Airlines landing & take off at Berlin)

And I believe Concorde could too.

stilton 11th February 2013 00:08

You can do anything once :eek:

USMCProbe 11th February 2013 00:25

You can do anything on your last flight.

Capt Claret 11th February 2013 03:03

Douglas/Boeing 717 requires weight on nose wheel for reverses to deploy.

Wizofoz 11th February 2013 03:08

And I believe a lot of Ruskie aircraft need to because they have so much residual thrust- A mate jump seated in a "Biz Jet" version of one of their three-engined aircraft, and was amazed to see they put the centere engine in reserse at TOD- otherwise the thing wouldn't descend!

galaxy flyer 11th February 2013 03:15

C-5 used in-flight reverse on the inboards, no speed brakes installed. NOT fo landing, though, 215 knots minimum.

SKYlove 11th February 2013 14:51

It was a yakovlev 40

The SSK 11th February 2013 14:54

I've experienced it on a BKS Trident landing on packed snow at Newcastle, it came down with a thump and stayed down :)

con-pilot 11th February 2013 15:37

On the 727 one can use the reversers anytime you want*. I never used them except after touchdown, except for screwing around in the sim.

Technically, as there is no WOW or squat switch that needs to be made to allow the reversers to work.

In fact, I never heard of anyone every using them in flight.

Check Airman 11th February 2013 17:21

Very interesting indeed. The C17 and C5 don't surprise me. I am surprised that the 727 can do it though. If the 737 can do it below 10ft RA, I imagine most company manuals prohibit it?

CV880 11th February 2013 17:23

The DC8 had no in-flight speedbrakes so reversers were used for emergency descent. The amount of reverse thrust and which reversers could be deployed varied from model to model and engine type. I was familiar with a JT3D powered version (50 series) that could attain near full reverse thrust on the inboards and idle reverse on the outboards when airborne. I only ever saw one deploy reversers prior to touchdown - a Swissair DC8-62 landing on 31 at Kai Tak was fast over the fence and the reversers were seen deploying with the main gear a few feet off the ground.
BEA Tridents seem to routinely select reverse before touchdown.

Wizofoz 11th February 2013 17:24


If the 737 can do it below 10ft RA, I imagine most company manuals prohibit it?
Oh indeed. (777 is also 10ft RA).
It's just meant to ensure REV is available straight after touchdown.

Wouldn't be suprised if the PF of the Aircraft in the video THOUGHT he was down.

ATC Watcher 11th February 2013 17:47

The CV990 (Coronado) could deploy the 4 reverses in flight for fast descents. That was SOP.
I have witnessed inboards reverses being selected on APP to reduce speed .
Knowing the airline ( Spantax) I am not sure it that was SOP or improvisation , but it worked well .

RAT 5 11th February 2013 21:44

If the 737 can do it below 10ft RA,

On the B732 version I flew there was a squat switch on the nose gear to prevent this. I don't know if it was a company option or standard. It seemed a good idea, because on bucket reversers ground contact as the a/c reared onto its haunches was a real threat; there-after the tail. I suspect the same tail strike hazard is alive & well on later versions with by-pass engines. And why would you want to anyway? if you're floating, and depending on the length of hard pan left in front of you, then either drop a wing to contact one wheel or scare yourself and squeeze the speed brake open a touch. Ultimately go-around. Still possible with the last 2 options but not after TR's have been activated.


All times are GMT. The time now is 21:35.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.