![]() |
Hey Jammedstab, I have never flown the -200, but the 3 4 and 800's have 'aileron trim units' on the yoke. Are you sure you are not getting mixed up with these markings?
|
Seems I was correct about 1.6 units - thats when the flight spoilers start to show a deflection, just tried it out today (well, between 1.5 and 2, its a very small difference anyway)...
|
Brilliant stbyrud, thanks for that. was that on an -800?
|
In all the Boeings from the 727 up to the Whale, the takeoff run is started with the wheel neutral. As you know a plane is nothing but a big weather vane. If the wind hits the right side of the vertical stabilizer the nose will want to go the right. Thus you need left rudder to offset the effects of the crosswind. The amount of left rudder input will decrease as the speed increase and the airflow over the vertical stabilizer takes effect. At the point of rotation, not being a Microsoft or simulator pilot, attention is outside the cockpit and not at the control wheel.
That said if I maintain left rudder input with the wheel neutral at rotation the aircraft will veer left and eventually roll left too. Thus you need to input right aileron. How much? Like I said, not being a simulator or Microsoft pilot I use sufficient aileron to maintain a wings level constant heading at the point of lift off. After liftoff then the aircraft is deslipped by neutralizing the controls and finding the proper crab angle to maintain desired track. Nothing scientific about a crosswind takeoff. Works the same way in Cubs, Stearmans, Pitts, Extras, Cessnas, Beechcraft, Commanders. I will say the only aircraft which is a bit twitchy on crosswind takeoffs was the good old reliable Aircoupe... no rudder pedals:eek:!. |
Originally Posted by framer
(Post 6959831)
Hey Jammedstab, I have never flown the -200, but the 3 4 and 800's have 'aileron trim units' on the yoke. Are you sure you are not getting mixed up with these markings?
Photos: Boeing 737-201 Aircraft Pictures | !!!!!!!!!!!!!! It is a bit difficult to see but if you look closely at the top of the control columns, you will see that it says "Control Wheel Degrees" and the markings go from 0 in the middle to 50 on either side. |
Jammedstab, thanks very much for that. Sorry to doubt. I wonder why they changed it to 'aileron trim units' for the subsequent models?
|
Originally Posted by misd-agin
(Post 6959783)
Boeing has stated what they expect a pilot in their aircraft to do. They do not say "keep the wings level". They say "approximately level."
Actually 737-200 FCTM dated April 30 2005 on page 3.11 says..." Maintain wings level during the takeoff roll by applying control wheel displacement into wind" Not sure where you got your info from. |
Maybe Boeing advise different techniques for longer aircraft?
|
Jammedstab - that was a quote from post #9's Boeing manual.
Checked two Boeing manuals I have and they say "limit control wheel input to that required to keep the wings level." |
Originally Posted by captjns
(Post 6959967)
In all the Boeings from the 727 up to the Whale, the takeoff run is started with the wheel neutral.
|
You are entitled to your opinion JammedStab
After some 20000 of PIC jet time with 5000 plus hours of Captaining the finest jet off the Boeing assembly line, the good old reliable 727 that is, I never had a near excursion or overrun on takeoff using my technique. The FAA was satisfied as well as I trained some of their folks too. At the end of the day, I guess what ever works... My point is that one's attention during the takeoff roll should be out the window and not at the control column and provide the appropriate control input accomplish a successful wings level takeoff. |
Crosswind takeoffs - at liftoff the cross control should be approximately the same as if you'd just touched down on landing.
If X crosswind controls = zero drift on touchdown that's the expected, and desired, performance on liftoff. It's a blend of technique and mechanical inputs. Boeing talks about 'smoothly'. :ok::D Mechanically? Rudder input will be greater than required aileron input(only enough to maintain wings level) while accelerating. At rotation more aileron will be require. How much? Think of your crosswind landing control inputs - if X rudder than give X aileron a try and make small(smooth) adjustments as you lift off and start your initial climb. Smooth input as necessary, maybe a slight increase immediately prior to Vr to achieve correct cross control for zero sideload on liftoff, reduce rudder first to allow nose to turn into wind (equal to crosswind) to maintain runway track, and level wings on correct heading. It's nice to see done correctly. If you've never flown with the other pilot before you'll have some insight to their ability by 100' on departure if there's a stiff crosswind. Hopefully it's :D and not :rolleyes:. (the slight increase in aileron is my opinion and no comment is made about it in Boeing statements) |
Originally Posted by captjns
(Post 6960675)
You are entitled to your opinion JammedStab
After some 20000 of PIC jet time with 5000 plus hours of Captaining the finest jet off the Boeing assembly line, the good old reliable 727 that is, I never had a near excursion or overrun on takeoff using my technique. The FAA was satisfied as well as I trained some of their folks too. At the end of the day, I guess what ever works... My point is that one's attention during the takeoff roll should be out the window and not at the control column and provide the appropriate control input accomplish a successful wings level takeoff. http://i1091.photobucket.com/albums/...0/727Xwind.png |
So all we know really is that Boeing recommended a different technique for the 727 than they are currently recommending for the 737 yeah?
|
Originally Posted by framer
(Post 6961104)
So all we know really is that Boeing recommended a different technique for the 727 than they are currently recommending for the 737 yeah?
|
You're right I do Jammedstab. Ta.
With that in mind, maybe it's not so much a 'type' thing as a time thing. Maybe around 2006 Boeing decided to change technique so that the roll started with the yoke centered and aileron was introduced to keep wings "approximately level" during the roll? |
Boeing changes their manuals at least once a year plus different operators may have different wording and techniques in their manuals. At the start of takeoff roll there is no airflow over the control surfaces so it doesn't matter where the controls are. Once you start to roll you steer with the rudder and keep the wings level with the ailerons. If you maintain runway center line and lift off with wings level you did it right. After becoming airborne you will be in a slip. Gradually take out the cross controls and fly whatever heading or course you need. I don't know whether the starting position for small airplanes is important, but after you get rolling they all work the same.
|
I don't pre set nor do I allow my F/O to pre set ailerons.
In the B747 training manual [published by Boeing] it says: "To prevent spoiler drag early in takeoff roll, do not preposition aileron into the wind until wing roll is noted." |
The Boeing 737 (300-900) FCTM reference is quite a recent change, they are now on Revision 9, dated 30 June 2010.
Edition 7 had the 'old' guidance as follows (cut & pasted): Maintain wings level during the takeoff roll by applying control wheel displacement into the wind. During rotation continue to apply control wheel in the displaced position to keep the wings level during liftoff. Begin the takeoff roll with the control wheel approximately centered. Throughout the takeoff roll, gradually increase control wheel displacement into the wind only enough to maintain approximately wings level. As for the statement "all airplanes fly the same", that is clearly rubbish, although a university professor in aeronautical physics may put it that way, because the fundamentals of lift/drag/thrust/weight/bernoulli etc do not change. They may all fly by the same principles of physics, but their handling qualities can be vastly different. |
Originally Posted by Pub User
(Post 6965522)
This shows that techniques are constantly under revision, and referring to FCTMs dated 1985 is probably not the best way to keep your skills up to date. Likewise referring to other machine's training guidance is not wise. |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 15:38. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.