PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Tech Log (https://www.pprune.org/tech-log-15/)
-   -   737-400 approach speed (https://www.pprune.org/tech-log/449571-737-400-approach-speed.html)

jidder 23rd April 2011 06:41

737-400 approach speed
 
Has anyone heard of a technique of adding 8kts to the approach speed instead of the recommended 5kts, In conditions where the reported wind speed is Variable less than 10 including tailwind.

I was told that this is a requirement on the 400. I can't find this in the FCOM.

Thanks,

J:E

ImbracableCrunk 23rd April 2011 10:20

That sounds odd. So if it was a 10 knot headwind, you'd add 5knots. But if it was variable at 10, you'd add 8 knots?

I've got 734 time and I've never heard of it.

jidder 23rd April 2011 10:52

I was told for any wind reported under 10 kts the approach speed was to be flown Vref+08kts!

I have never heard of this before, would there be any reason or justification for this?

J:E

ImbracableCrunk 23rd April 2011 11:07

Hmmm. That's not in any of the references I have from two airlines. One airline I've flown at used Vref+10 as the minimum for RNP approaches. That was for -4,7,8, and 900s.

Otherwise it's from the FCTM and that is the standard.

jidder 23rd April 2011 11:23

That's what I thought.

I have flown the 6,7,800 and all my classic time on the 400 and never heard of such a thing! Hence my post here.....

It's in the FCTM and I will be sticking to the +5kts unless the wind dictates different.

Thanks,

J :E

BOAC 23rd April 2011 11:43

Do you have an Ops Manual?

jidder 23rd April 2011 11:52

BOAC

Yes and there is no mention of it. I thought that it may be a technique that I hadn't been told about.

It makes no sense to carry extra speed when not required. My company operates into alot of high elev airfields. 5000-6000 ft so this would give a higher GS over the numbers. I wouldn't like to have an over run.:sad: Not that the 3Kts would cause that.....

J:E

jidder 23rd April 2011 11:57

Should have mentioned hot too!

J:E

BOAC 23rd April 2011 12:01

Thought I would ask, since most Ops Manuals TELL you how to bug speeds and that is what you should be doing! Traditionally on Boeing it is half the speed plus all the 'gusts' so I guess you could derive + 8 in some circumstances but not as an SOP.

jidder 23rd April 2011 12:12

No standard Boeing. That is why I wondered about the Vref +08kts in nil wind!

I guess it must just be his own aditive for the wife and kids:suspect:

Thanks for your input......thought I was missing something somewhere.

J:E

BOAC 23rd April 2011 13:53

How many wives and how many kids.......?:D Perhaps particular pilot is 'frightened' by the thought of flying SO SLOWLY..............:confused:

Tee Emm 23rd April 2011 14:24


Traditionally on Boeing it is half the speed plus all the 'gusts'
Presumably you mean half the reported headwind component plus all the gust factor? Not forgetting the FCTM advice to bleed off the headwind component approaching touch down. Many airlines fail to accentuate this point and the result is excess speed over the threshold and long float which is not a Good Thing - especially if runway length limited and its raining.

BOAC 23rd April 2011 14:45


Presumably you mean half the reported headwind component plus all the gust factor?
- indeed - hopefully 'abbreviated' for those who understand:ugh:

jidder 23rd April 2011 17:55

Tee Emm

Thanks I understood exactly what BOAC was talking about. The thread was reference to why would you set Vref +8 as standard instead of Vref +5 as recommended inthe FCTM.

I also understand that you have to maintain the gust factor if applied whilst removing the mean wind component.

I guess it's like BOAC says ....this guy doesn't like to fly the recommended speed and would like to use more runway! All good and well on long runways:suspect:

J:E

de facto 24th April 2011 03:32

check your QRH and see the landing distance difference for an increase of 3 kts...cant be that much..maybe 30 m? if you keep it until touch down..
I normally add one kt but thats for my grandma..

jidder 24th April 2011 03:50

D Facto

What TRTO does your grandma work at:}

Maybe one day that 60m will be required....why fly faster than required?

Do you Increase your V1 because you feel like it? Why not depart with a 13kt tailwind.

We don't have to be so rigid with the numbers but common sense dictates.

J:E

Denti 24th April 2011 04:13

Increased V1 and/or Vr is actually a boeing standard procedure for improved climb out performance. As much as up to 35kts is perfectly normal.

jidder 24th April 2011 04:20

Yes Denti.....

If the figures tell you that your V1 for an Improved climb is 168kts you don't go adding 3 kts cos you feel like it do you?

That was my point.

My original question was why would you set 3kts faster than the boeing recommended Vref +5kts for nil wind conditions.

End of! Thanks

J:E

de facto 24th April 2011 04:47

Do your SOPs dictate to use A/T OFF for app/landing with A/P oFF??
Maybe the guy just doesnt trust you can fly vref+5 so accurately..and believes adding 3 kts to the APPROACH speed (which will be bled off) during flare is a safer option to start with or when you scan and reaction arent as quick as they used to be...

TO answer your question: APPROACH SPEED does NOT affect your landing distance!
You must plan to be at VREF and stay there from 50ft to touchdown...the speed you fly before this gate is irrelevant.


f the figures tell you that your V1 for an Improved climb is 168kts
its not V1 that you increase,,,its V2...but v1 and vr get dragged along...

but thanks for the COMMON SENSE class...:rolleyes:

jidder 24th April 2011 05:17

De Facto

Why the attitude? Great CRM...

The chap who advised me to fly Vref +8 also does this himself, so maybe it is just you who thinks I can't fly the aircraft at the command speed.....

I could go on about what speed you should be over the numbers but I think it would be wasted on you.....suffice to say you should not always be at Vref:ugh:

The sorry thing about COMMON SENSE is it's not very common anymore. You are a prime example!

Have a nice day.....

J:E


All times are GMT. The time now is 15:57.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.