![]() |
Seems like it might be a lot easier to go down in the left body gear well and simply top off the resorvoir. a) a waste of fluid b) messy and dangerous (if you spill it on sensitive body parts) c) you would have to drain the overfilled system d) a waste of time walking to the store 500 meters away to get fluid and a handpump e) you don't get to stay dry and warm in the cockpit So what are the advantages of your method? :} |
We don't generally see an overfilled system. That kind of puts the rest to bed.
a) a waste of fluid b) messy and dangerous (if you spill it on sensitive body parts) c) you would have to drain the overfilled system d) a waste of time walking to the store 500 meters away to get fluid and a handpump e) you don't get to stay dry and warm in the cockpit b--Bigger danger slipping while filling. Don't spill it on sensitive body parts. Same applies for a lot of other things, including the hot coffee upstairs. c--Not a problem, because we generally don't see an overfilled system. d--Our store is onboard, and the airplane comes with a built-in pump; it's part of the hydraulic system at the refill point in the left body gear well. e--There's a lot to being said for staying warm and dry, but it's really neither here nor there if the airplane needs servicing. |
Guppy
No one is advocating "servicing" the resovior using the method described ie topping up a system that is at 70% from a system that is at 100% although it might work in a pinch. What they are describing is transfering the fluid back to its original system because over time it has transfered to the other system ie one is at 120% and the other is at 80%.:ok: 7 |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 09:07. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.