![]() |
Originally Posted by 411A
(Post 5614421)
The -524B402 version on the -500 model TriStar, was about 1500 pounds heavier than its GE counterpart, on the DC10, if I recall correctly.
However...the Roller was considerably more fuel efficient (9%, actually) and....quieter. Have to say, RollsRoyce....mightly fine engines.:) |
The rumbling noise of an RB211 on a Tristar is something else, working at LHR in the 70's when the first BA one's appeared was incredible -
and the spool up of of an E4 on a 757 is the sweetest music |
My particular memory of the RB211s is that the smell of fuel was always prevalent on start-up, more so than other types of engine.It was as if the pilots had left the choke on too long!.
Anilv |
Originally Posted by widgeon
(Post 10599106)
I still find it hard to believe that such a great engineering company could not have foreseen that the anisotropic properties of unidirectional carbon might have been a problem .
(originally published in 'Silent, Swift, Superb', Henderson, 1998). |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 04:06. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.