![]() |
NOTAM Retention
My airline's ops manual and JAR Ops etc state that "Route specific NOTAM
documentation, if specifically edited by the operator" must be retained for a period of three months. Can anyone tell me where I can find a definition of route specific NOTAMs? We get a whole load of NOTAM information printed off automatically at the start of the flight duty. It includes the departure, destination, enroute, and multiple alternate aerodrome notams, for each sector. The company "policy" is to only retain the destination and first alternate NOTAM's at the end of the day, and throw away everything else. Of course this policy is not written down anywhere. The ops manual simply states to retain NOTAMS, full stop. I am wondering is this simply so they can store thousands of smaller envelopes, rather than thousands of larger ones. Does anyone know what the regulation actually means? |
Route specific NOTAM documentation, if specifically edited by the operator" must be retained for a period of three months So, according to Jar Ops no needs to retain any notam till your company makes use of other editor notams. where I can find a definition of route specific NOTAMs? My self interpretation says dep, dep altn if any, destn, destn altn(s) if any, all the enroute airport which allow you to remain within 60 min rule from planned track, etops altn if any. Ciao ;) |
Thanks. All our NOTAMs are filtered by the company. Would you think that this means we are required by JAR OPS to retain every single NOTAM that comes out of the computer for our flights, because of the fact that they are filtered by the company?
|
Thanks. All our NOTAMs are filtered by the company. Would you think that this means we are required by JAR OPS to retain every single NOTAM that comes out of the computer for our flights, because of the fact that they are filtered by the company however... most filtering programmes keep that in a log file anyhow so the actual physical piece of paper does not need to be kept. Whether your airline adopts this system will depend on your local regulators interpretation of JAR (EU now) - OPS. |
Daysleeper, I disagree.
Filtering notams does not mean to edit. Editing and spreading work is commissioned to another company (Sita, Jeppesen, others) The company I work for do not retain neither notam nor wx for this reason. As you told they have a storing software too. And of course everybody have to relate to the "local interpretation" of the law :{ |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 05:35. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.