PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Tech Log (https://www.pprune.org/tech-log-15/)
-   -   Reduced Thrust Takeoff (https://www.pprune.org/tech-log/290241-reduced-thrust-takeoff.html)

Long D 31st August 2007 19:06

Reduced Thrust Takeoff
 
Please can someone enlighten us, why if you are dispatched with a thrust reverser inop, on a B737 CL, why can't you use reduced Takeoff Thrust? Since [Thrust Reverser] it is not taken into consideration in the RTO calculations by the manufacturer. And you are not taking off from a contaminated runway?

Thanks

Long D

barit1 1st September 2007 02:03

What engine rating (3B1/3B2/3C1) ?

GreginAlaska 1st September 2007 02:04

I'm not a pilot but I want to take a guess at this...could it because you would be farther down the runway by the time you hit V1?

Tail-take-off 1st September 2007 09:24

It's just plain old risk assessment by Boeing.

They don't take reverse into account for normal take-offs but it is still available should you reject.

If the eng with the serviceable reverser fails you no longer have that option so they use rated thrust. ie accelerate distance to V1 is shorter therefore stopping distance is longer.

Of course you only have this luxury when you would have done a red thr take-off. A field length limited full power take-off wouldn't have any additional margin beyond those mandated by the perf requirements.

Long D 1st September 2007 12:54

It is a policy and has nothing to do with engine, since we operate aircrafts with all engine versions. Also to the rest, Takeoff calculations do not cater for reverse thrust operation during a rejected T/O, it has nothing to do with how long you run on a runway. Thanks

Tail-take-off 1st September 2007 14:43

Read my post again


It's just plain old risk assessment by Boeing.


All times are GMT. The time now is 17:10.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.