PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Tech Log (https://www.pprune.org/tech-log-15/)
-   -   A320 handling vs B737 (https://www.pprune.org/tech-log/279419-a320-handling-vs-b737.html)

TooFast 10th June 2007 00:39

A320 handling vs B737
 
For those who flew both:

Is the A320 easier, nicer, to fly than the 737?

Do you miss your previous plane?

Why?

gatbusdriver 11th June 2007 08:27

Although not on 737 I am on 757.

Having spent 8 years on A320/330, I am a big fan. Loved it. Now have command on 757, also a great bit of kit(now my scan is back up to speed), especially for first command. Nice to see what inputs are happening from the other seat.

Best thing about the airbus (and the thing I miss most) has to be the table.

185 Lbs of Ballast!! 11th June 2007 10:19

I've had the pleasure to fly both:) I I think the 320 is a more pleasant environment to spend the day, and the benefit of a table should not be dismissed:O The 320 is also quieter in the flightdeck. On ballance I'd rather be in the 320 with the exception of a gusty crosswindy sort of day, or, God forbid, a total hydraulic or electrical failure.:\

Both great aeroplanes and a pleasure to fly.

Down Three Greens 11th June 2007 16:48

Wow...two sensible answers...phew :ok:

sarah737 11th June 2007 17:45

If you are a button pusher the airbus is by far the better option. If stick and rudder is your thing choose for boeing.

PhoenixRising 11th June 2007 18:47

^
^
Yes that's right Sarah. Not much more needs to be said.:rolleyes:

Down Three Greens 11th June 2007 19:16

Oh...Sarah!! I think your pprune name sums it up really. A very naive statement me thinks. :=

What would you classify a button-pusher! :confused:

sarah737 11th June 2007 19:57

Naive if you want, but based on 6000 hrs on the 737 and 5000 on the airbus! Less naive than judging somebody on her name me thinks!
I was just pointing out the difference as I see it, and believe me I saw a lot! Your personal attack is a bit misplaced.

gatbusdriver 11th June 2007 20:39

I see where you're coming from Sarah.

Going to the Boeing is like going back to flying as I used to know it (I was 250hr cadet straight onto A320), and I have to say i'm really enjoying it. But you can still enjoy flying the Airbus, I would regularly take out the autopilot and autothrottle, and fly visual circuits to various Greek airfields etc.

sarah737 11th June 2007 20:50

I did not say you can't fly the airbus manually.
I said: if you prefer using the automatics you will enjoy the airbus more, if you prefer stick and rudder the boeing will give you more satisfaction. So the choice is yours, just sharing my experience.

Down Three Greens 11th June 2007 21:01

Sarah

Don't take it to heart.....I think your choice of 'button pusher' was not the best 'term of phrase' to use.

DTG

ps...as far as judging on the name..fair point

Rananim 12th June 2007 09:35

Never tell an Airbus pilot they're button-pushers..it really winds them up.I do agree though that table is really neat and that is what is important after all.

Dream Land 12th June 2007 09:53

I'm proud to be a "Button pusher", doesn't hurt my feelings. :ok:

FL245 13th June 2007 16:11

just came off 737 to A320/1, I actually miss the 737 and would move back to it in the morning.

Whilst the airbus is a nice enviorment, the 321 in particular is a pain. Flap retraction at heavy weights? poor climb performance etc Whilst i appreciate its heavier than the 737-700, its not an enjoyable to fly, for me!

I will move to 330 in next few months, people say its a lot nicer than the smaller airbus? true?

fantom 13th June 2007 16:25

245,

The 321 is a pain for lots of reasons (wing too small, for a start).

Don't believe the brochures. The 330 is not a big 320; it is just fabulous.

Completely different, as well.

Dream Land 13th June 2007 16:26

If you don't enjoy the A321 you will hate the A330, just my 2 cents. :}

junior_man 13th June 2007 17:30

Either plane is fine. Boeing vs Airbus is a religious war for some, but it is just a tool. Each has their advantages. The airbus is definately a nicer working environment. The Air Con actually works and you are not stuffed into what was the cockpit designed in the 50's for the KC 135. ( Yes that is the 707 nose still). The lack of air con that works may not be a factor in the UK but other places it certainly is. You can handfly either plane and have a good time. Boeing more pleasant in a crosswind or an upset would be better. FMC and mode control panel better in the Boeing. Table damn nice to eat on in the Bus. Bus is quieter and more comfortable.
The best choice? Fly whichever gets you the best schedule, layovers and the most time off.

alexban 13th June 2007 18:30

The Air Con is a lot improved on the Ng,maybe a bit too much...you can't really hear the engines anymore :zzz:
And you are not flying manually the Bus ,you are c-w-steering it, is it not true? And no feedback on the controls ,also...
Different technology, both great machines, but a different approach to flying..

Dream Land 14th June 2007 02:09

Alexban, true, I do not get a real satisfaction when hand flying the Airbus because there is no feedback :bored:, just a lower level of automation with auto trimming.

junior_man 14th June 2007 02:42

Airbus still feels like an airplane unless you are really yanking and banking. And you don't do that with pax onboard. The Boeing is artificial feel the airbus is springs. DC 9 was nicer than both to hand fly.
Again, days off quality of the trips etc matter much more than the minor differences.


All times are GMT. The time now is 15:00.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.