PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Tech Log (https://www.pprune.org/tech-log-15/)
-   -   MEL (https://www.pprune.org/tech-log/10580-mel.html)

Capt. Horrendous 2nd February 2001 02:14

MEL
 
We are having a discussion on our private forum regarding the MEL. There appears to be some confusion as to when reference to the MEL is required. Without quoting parrot fashion from JAR, it seems that once an aircraft has started taxying under it's own power for the purpose of undertaking a flight, then the Captain 'may' reference the MEL to help make a go/no go decision, whereas if he was still at the gate or attached to the tug he 'must' reference the MEL. Any comments ??.

------------------
Horry Snr.

fly4fud 2nd February 2001 02:31

Same as what I learned...

------------------
... cut my wings and I'll die ...

static 2nd February 2001 16:00

MEL MUST be consulted prior to start of Take Off roll.

Capt. Horrendous 2nd February 2001 17:43

I quote from the rule book - JAR-MMEL/MEL.001 (d) "

" Limit of MEL Applicability. The MEL is applicable up to the commencement of flight."

" Commencement of flight. The point when an aircraft begins to move under its own power for the purpose of preparing for take off.
"

Also: from ACJ MMEL/MEL.001(d)

" If a failure occurs during taxy phase before the start of the take off roll, any decision to continue the flight shall be subject to pilot judgement and good airmanship. The commander may refer to the MEL before any decision to continue the flight is taken."
It is interesting to note that the ACJ uses the word "may" and not "must".

For those who are unfamiliar with the JAR/ACJ system, a JAR is the rule and the ACJ is a way of offering guidance on the use of the rule.

There in lies the confusion.


------------------
Horry Snr.

3holelover 5th February 2001 00:55

A simpler way to look at that would be:
If you're sitting at the gate, you must cunsult the MEL for your problem, as it's a problem before the flight starts. Whereas, while you're taxiing out, any problem you have now will be considered by maintenance as an "inbound" snag at the next base (unless you don't go). But you'd be velly velly silly not to look at the MEL anyway.

411A 5th February 2001 01:23

Very similar to the FAA, I believe. Once you have left the gate it is up to the PIC.

Hot End 5th February 2001 04:01

Not with standing all of the above, some of my previous employers have inserted into their DDG preamble a requirement that after QRH actions have been carried out, MEL must be consulted prior to take off.

Now the confusion and fun really starts. Especially if your at an outstation with no engineer coverage.

------------------
Goddamit! Burnt another one


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:18.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.