PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Tech Log (https://www.pprune.org/tech-log-15/)
-   -   IRS fast realignment (https://www.pprune.org/tech-log/82943-irs-fast-realignment.html)

jorgvaz 28th Feb 2003 04:47

IRS fast realignment
 
Hi, please could anybody help me on this topic?

In wich circumstances is proper to perform a fast realignment procedure??

Thanks in advance!

CaptSnails 28th Feb 2003 06:50

Anytime you may have residual ground speed. Fast realignment permits you to zero ground speed and enter a new present position. In some instances a full allignment is required, for example if the flight is planned to go into RVSM airspace.

Dom Joly 28th Feb 2003 07:38

We used to do a fast realign in the turnarounds as we often only had 30 mins. Dont have IRS on our a/c anymore (different a/c). Im not aware of a requirement to do a full IRS alignment if going into RVSM - I changed whilst RVSM was being introduced. If we had a long turn around 1hr+ we might do a full realign or if there was a noticeable problem with the IRS's e.g. wander. The a/c position will update when you press the TOGA button for Take Off to the Rwy threshold (or displaced threshold if you enter that in the FMC's). They should as far as we are concerned be positionally as accurate as each other (full vs. fast).

FlapsOne 28th Feb 2003 14:08

Full alignment only takes 7-10 mins - what's the problem on a 30 min turnround?

TopBunk 28th Feb 2003 17:44

I seem to recall a technical memo in the company I fly the A319/320 for coming out in the last couple of months actually encouraging 'fast' re-aligns rather than full re-aligns on transits.

Can't remember the reason (don't really care if the truth be told).

Dom Joly 28th Feb 2003 19:31

7 - 10 mins in which you can't get a visual representation of the route. We were encouraged by the training dept to use 'fast realigning' to aid turnaround time. This was especially the case if we were late arriving or had a 'tight slot'. Our FMC's were rather old & had a small memory capacity. As a result only the regular departure SID's & STAR's remained in the database. Therefore, if we had a different SID than the one in the FMC we would have to construct it ourselves. With some airfields having complicated procedures like Milan the extra 7 mins was often invaluable!

QAVION 1st Mar 2003 07:44

"7 - 10 mins in which you can't get a visual representation of the route."

Didn't your aircraft cockpit navigation displays have a PLAN selection for viewing the route? (On most glass cockpit aircraft, no IRS alignment is required to view the route on the PLAN page). MAP, on the other hand, is a different story.

Cheers.
Q.

ECAM Status 2nd Mar 2003 22:49

Airbus in their FCOM3, recommend NOT to do any realignment of the IRS's if the residual groundspeed of the 3 IRS's is less than 5kts. If even 1 IRS has a residual groundspeed of 5kts or more, a quick realignment must be made. That is for transit stops.

Also, FCOM3 says " For flights with long segments on which there is no updating of FMGC position with radio navigation (i.e. over the North Atlantic MNPS airspace, especially if the aircraft is not equiped with GPS), perform a complete alignment. For all other flights a quick alignment is sufficient. ADIRS PERFORMANCE MAY BE DEGRADED IF COMPLETE ALIGNMENTS ARE SYSTEMATICALLY PERFORMED.

Hope it helps.

Brenoch 4th Mar 2003 00:23

I think the MNPS area is what Capt Snails is refering to rather than RVSM. The only thing you won't get on a fast realign versus a full one is heading update.

I think thats what it comes back to with the MNPS, to have the most accurate heading possible..

My two p.

Regs

SuperRanger 4th Mar 2003 02:50

on the 73 classic that i used to fly, we used to do a full-align on every stop but then the rate of IRS failures started to go up. from recommendation of engineering, we then switch to a fast-align on transit of less then 1 hrs (or there abouts).

on the current 777, there's no fast-align :) for the ADIRU's so the recommendation is a realignment every 24 hours.

SR

TopBunk 4th Mar 2003 08:45

Superranger


on the 73 classic that i used to fly, we used to do a full-align on every stop
The 737 Classics (ie the -200) that I flew did not have IRS's, so I suspect that you are not really talking about the 737 Classic at all.

:p

Down...2 greens 8th Mar 2003 20:45

TopBunk,

According to Boeing's terminology the 737-100/200 were the 'Originals', the -300/-400/-500 were the 'Classics' and the -700/-800/-900 are the NGs.

Wizofoz 9th Mar 2003 00:01

D2G

And the 600!! Don`t forget the 600!! Nobody ever remembers the 600!!!

Anybody actually bought one???:eek: :* :eek:

Chill 9th Mar 2003 01:01

Quickies
 
In the States we got told (as in "do") ... "There's always time to do a full re-align - so do it." ... which is all well and good when you're on Ver 10+

Now operating on Ver 1.6 (so slow I can go to the fwd galley, make a coffee, come back and it's still computing performance) so Dom Joly's comment is sadly all too true, minutes become precious - and re-entering SIDs gets a little tedious :*

And hey - QAVION - some of us are still getting around in "hardballs" mate and I still haven't found a way to transfer RTE PLAN data to the WX radar :8 actually I'd probably have more success reading it in the coffee granules in my cup :hmm:

We do a quickie just prior to pushback (to zero any errors from - particularly extended - gate time) and another at turnaround unless we're there for more than 30-40 minutes.

TopBunk 9th Mar 2003 06:20

D2G

'737-100/200 = originals, 733/4/5 = classics.'

That's news to me. Ah well, we live and learn.

So, following on from that what are the 741, 742, 743 known as? I have always refered to the 741 & 742 as the classics, are they also now the originals too?

jorgvaz 11th Mar 2003 04:14

Thank you all very much for the info. It is really appreciated.

:ok:

The Puzzler 5th Oct 2004 13:24

Puzzle me this....

Sorry to drag this out of the archives but a quick question regarding the need to perform a quick align on the 737NG. On 30 min turnarounds is it necessary to do any realigning or is it OK to just enter the airport identifier and cross check the last position in the FMS vs our present position. I fully understand what a quick align does re: groundspeed etc but this question relates to what is the general norm amongst other NG operators.

Thanks in advance ;)

Wizofoz 5th Oct 2004 16:00

Puzzler,

Whilst the FMC position should always be updated via the GPS, the IRS platform has many other functions, so re-alligning it is a good idea whether fast or slow..one obvious one being that I think (and I stand to be corrected) that the Ground Speed readout and Wind calculation are purely IRS.

The Puzzler 5th Oct 2004 17:40

Puzzle me this....

Wizofoz,

Thanks for the reply. You're correct in relation to the groundspeed and wind, which is one of the reasons I'm all for at least a fast align on short turnarounds and a full align when time permits. From what I can ascertain the GPS is extremely accurate at position fixing (assuming good satellite coverage) but this alone should not determine whether we realign or not. We are, as you correctly say, zeroing several other 'errors'. ;)

MasterBates 5th Oct 2004 19:34

FlapsOne sais:

Full alignment only takes 7-10 mins - what's the problem on a 30 min turnround?
If after full alignment, just before pushback you notice g/s on the IRS, simply do a quick align. It doesn´t do any harm, just stops the groundspeed and the gate position can be re-entered.
;)


All times are GMT. The time now is 17:01.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.