Originally Posted by Bobsmith3443
(Post 11612596)
I found the auto thrust on the neos to be terrible other than that its the same aircraft
|
I fly mainly neos and I don't dare to cut thrust below 20 ft callout unless I have added a considerable amount of Vapp increment in case of strong crosswind. Spool down is faster than on the V2500, the engines are bigger and become massive drag generators.
|
I never cut thrust until first RETARD call out. I indeed am firmly at idle stop prior to touchdown
|
Originally Posted by enzino
(Post 11613856)
I fly mainly neos and I don't dare to cut thrust below 20 ft callout unless I have added a considerable amount of Vapp increment in case of strong crosswind. Spool down is faster than on the V2500, the engines are bigger and become massive drag generators.
|
I know what Airbus says but my experience on the line has been different so far.
|
Originally Posted by vilas
(Post 11614538)
That's not what Airbus says.
|
Originally Posted by HarimauMalaya
(Post 11606962)
Hello friends,
I seek help to understand the Airbus A321neo aircraft better. I have started training on this and it is difficult to land. I hear similar story’s from experienced pilots. The flare law is different from the A320/321ceo, as in the FCOM but can someone say why it is more challenging to land and share your experiences? Can you give sources other than the FCOM for more information? Thank you!!! My advice would be don't over think it, it’s an Airbus, like any other. The only thing I do is ensure I have minimum 5kts between Vapp and Vls. But I do that on both types, and it’s an old school thing for a cat C aircraft that should really be cat D. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:39. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.