Turbo fan anomaly... driving me nuts and I don't have many left to lose
TFE731, a blender.
Has a bunch of stages for sqeezing stuff, both axial and centrifugal... great for ears. Has a bunch of bunsen burners, the compact kind... has a set of HPT and LPT, that drives the blender at the front through a RGB. The very first (maybe) geared turbo fan. Yaay. Shows N1, N2, ITT, F/F etc, Has levers to the FCU & a DEEC that controls N1, which has some limited authority Issue is... Matched engines.... N1/N2/FF and thrust lever, all match, with DEEC on or off, and plane drives in a straight line (disregarding my version of IF) ITT, 25C higher on one engine. match ITTs, got a stagger of everything, N1/N2/FF and Thrust lever are all low on the high ITT side. Add rudder trim to keep face off the side windows. Swap ITT gauges, issue stays with engine. Swap engine positions, issue follows engine. Borescope the inny bit, clean, burners same. Engine to engine, summa summa. Surge bleed valves... through shop with engine and apparently OK.... (but not verified independently) So... I've had bad thermocouples on jets before, most of the time they gave low EGT/T5/TOT/ITT.... Is there a mode of degrading of the thermocouples that causes an increase in indicated temp? Sitting on a cold plane, they are within 1 degree.... the issue arises at idle, and remains almost constant differential up to full thrust. My confusion arises from ever bothering to own aircraft. Except for the Pitts, and maybe the T28B, one cuz everyone should fly a Pitts particularly single-seat ones, and the other as starting an 1820 is a lot of fun. A degradation of aero path in an engine should exhibit an increase in ITT, FF and also change N1/N2 relationship (well almost always for the last one) I passed this issue past the OEM, and got blank stares for my efforts. The response is that it is within limits, which is only true to a certain point, as we are affecting thrust output when we use an ITT setting rather than an N1. Anyone with an answer to the observations shall not go unpunished. :E |
I don't think it is the real case, but otherwise all things being equal (just being imaginative, and surely you considered)
- the physical location of the sensor is not the same (something mounted 180 degrees around) - the power supplied to the sensor is not identical (RF / supply issue / grounding / loose currents / frequency). |
Bit different to jet, but the PT6's that I'm familiar with (purely from a pilot perspective), have had issues before with over-temp, or approaching limits, report to maintenance and they change out the' ITT trim stick'.
In very lay terms they explained it as applying a correction to the ITT gauges etc, to keep the pilots happy, but nothing (engine-wise) really changed. Does the Garrett have anything similar? I can't post the link but Google 'PT6 trim', and the top article from Kingair Magazine explains it in more detail. |
There was a similar problem on Rotorheads about different TITs when matching TQs(different engines ) a couple of weeks ago.Lots of suggestions,but not sure if the guy in Malaysia found the answer...My suggestion was to swap all thermocouples/check if bent,burned ,aligned/incorrect length,ie washers/spacers,between engines....
ed.Rotorheads,page2 -AS355 F2 Engine problems; I know power is measured differently,but it might give you ideas..another one,comp.wash.. |
Is one engine older than the other?
|
I'm not trying to be a jerk, but you're really freaking out over 25 degrees? I've never heard of any requirement for engine parameters to match up exactly, and in almost no case will they unless both engines are identical in every way. The split you're seeing could easily be explained by a minor difference in wear, bleed valve position, temperature probe condition, etc. I've seen a 100C difference in the 737 during cruise, as you can imagine airlines swap engines all the time so it would be easy to have a mix of old and new. Now if you were seeing that much difference (or more) in new(er) engines, or if you suddenly went from a small split to a large one with no explanation it might be worth looking into. But if it's only 25 degrees and doesn't change wildly then there shouldn't be any concern.
And again no offense, but trying to match ITT and therefore throwing N1 and N2 out of whack is just comical. Besides making the airplane out of trim as you mentioned, having the engines out of sync and the resulting wah wah wah had to be quite annoying! |
Originally Posted by Sig229
(Post 11255203)
I'm not trying to be a jerk, but you're really freaking out over 25 degrees? I've never heard of any requirement for engine parameters to match up exactly, and in almost no case will they unless both engines are identical in every way. The split you're seeing could easily be explained by a minor difference in wear, bleed valve position, temperature probe condition, etc. I've seen a 100C difference in the 737 during cruise, as you can imagine airlines swap engines all the time so it would be easy to have a mix of old and new. Now if you were seeing that much difference (or more) in new(er) engines, or if you suddenly went from a small split to a large one with no explanation it might be worth looking into. But if it's only 25 degrees and doesn't change wildly then there shouldn't be any concern.
And again no offense, but trying to match ITT and therefore throwing N1 and N2 out of whack is just comical. Besides making the airplane out of trim as you mentioned, having the engines out of sync and the resulting wah wah wah had to be quite annoying! In the end we respect the ITT limits but set equal N1s with one engine as a master, this clunker having no sync for the reasons you note, but look for reasons that the display is as it is. |
Originally Posted by fdr
(Post 11255211)
Actually, yeah, it is frustrating... Many power settings are to a temp, and that means either accepting a difference or not. These two engines have common history, the other plane with common history matches remarkably, as in pretty much exactly.
In the end we respect the ITT limits but set equal N1s with one engine as a master, this clunker having no sync for the reasons you note, but look for reasons that the display is as it is. |
The high ITT engine is degraded or damaged in some way. In order to generate as much thrust as the "good" engine, it is burning more fuel/requires more heat and it's not being usefully used, hence the higher than normal turbine temp. Compressor damage (lower pressure ratio= less thermal efficiency), leaky surge bleeds, degraded turbine (pressure/temp drop across the turbine is in line with power extraction and is a known quantity at the design stage). Is there a mismatch between N1 & N2? More info required. Line up the fuel flows and tell us what the other parameters do.
|
Originally Posted by Private jet
(Post 11256840)
The high ITT engine is degraded or damaged in some way. In order to generate as much thrust as the "good" engine, it is burning more fuel/requires more heat and it's not being usefully used, hence the higher than normal turbine temp. Compressor damage (lower pressure ratio= less thermal efficiency), leaky surge bleeds, degraded turbine (pressure/temp drop across the turbine is in ilne with power extraction and is a known quantity at the design stage).
Sig229 I used to fly the Lear 45 with TFE-731s, it was long enough ago I don't recall many of the finer details. We did have engine sync, could couple to either N1 or N2. I don't recall ever being temp limited in that one engine was operating hotter enough than the other to the point it would affect operation. Same in the 737, the EEC does all the work determining thrust setting based on ambient conditions. The only time I've ever been limited by ITT was flying turboprops, we would set power by torque unless we hit maximum ITT then that would be max power for that current condition. If the engine "temped out" before reaching a minimum torque value there was something wrong and maintenance would have to look into it. |
If you line up the fuel flows and the N1's are the same then it's an ITT measurement problem, & if as you say it follows the engine position it is obviously within the engine itself. Probably a wiring issue if the thermocouples are good
|
Originally Posted by Private jet
(Post 11256860)
If you line up the fuel flows and the N1's are the same then it's an ITT measurement problem, & if as you say it follows the engine position it is obviously within the engine itself. Probably a wiring issue if the thermocouples are good
|
Originally Posted by fdr
(Post 11256938)
there is always the possibility that the other engine is in fact reading low... :}
|
It's probably worth noting that the thermocouples that are used to measure turbine gas temperatures are not the most accurate way to measure temperature.
RTD's - Resistive Temperature Device - are very accurate, but can't handle the temperature ranges in a turbine (they work great for things like ambient temperature and total air temp), and are really easy to fault detect. Thermocouples not so much. It's quite possible that the thermocouple on one engine isn't reading accurately. |
Yes, my poor choice of the word "instrumentation". I should have said "measurement system".
|
Originally Posted by fdr
(Post 11254858)
I've had bad thermocouples on jets before, most of the time they gave low EGT/T5/TOT/ITT.... Is there a mode of degrading of the thermocouples that causes an increase in indicated temp?
No experience at all with turbo fan engines but I experienced exactly this problem on my Lycoming IO-360 with electronic engine indicating system. Only one of the 8 thermocouple inputs was impacted. |
i used to cover airline and Part 91 corporate operators with on site engine performance and support before retirement. I
can attest that a mismatched parameter will drive operators bonkers. Especially a pair of engines with matching parameters Before OH thaa come back mismatched after OH. From your information I would guess that one of the ITT harnesses is the culprit. I'd suggest bench check harnesses if BC available or swap one or both to identify bad harness. |
Just on the bleeds - Do you get the same temp rise when the bleeds are turned on? Do you get the same temp rise when the engine anti ice is turned on?
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:23. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.