RNP Approach
 

In several RNP Approach charts I have noticed that the 'M" Missed Approach Point is at Runway Threshold. If an aircraft is allowed to fly level at MDA till Runway threshold in this case, how can a landing be accomplished in the Touch Down Zone? Or am I missing something very obvious? Thanks in advance.

The Missed Approach Point does not have any connection to the landing itself. He just defines where the Missed Approach Procedure starts. For landing you have to be able to land in the TDZ within your company's operating limits. (e.g. max rate of descent 1000 ft/min).
So, if the MISAP is at ray threshold, your descent for landing has to start earlier.

The missed approach point has nothing to do with whether you can or can’t land. Like the above mentioned it’s simply where the missed approach starts or the earliest a turn can be established in the G/A.

In case of a 2D approach (to LNAV) minima yes. 3D approach (LNAV/VNAV or LPV) minima require you to commence a missed approach at DA. That being said, for commercial operations under EASA, all NPAs should be flown as a CDFA, which means go-around shall be commenced at DA or MAPt, whichever comes first.

1) In many legislations level flight upon reaching the MDA is forbidden, for quite some time.

2) On some installations (such as the type the OP is most familiar with) it is the technological limitation of FMS which needs to have MAPt coded at RWY THR with a hard constraint of 50' TCH in order to properly calculate the VNAV path. Especially the segment below MDA.

I think the 1) is actually quite obvious, called CDFA. Sorry for being blunt.

This is a fine, but important point of distinction. Vertically, the missed is commenced at crossing DDA (if reached before the MAP). Laterally, it's commenced at the MAP. (At least in TERPS land)

If you were circling to land.

As I understand it here in Oz, the MAP at RW gives the designer of the procedure a known point to chart the G/A. Most modern approaches are CDA and tracking to the MAP does not need to be level, in fact it would be dumb to do that. Climb as hard as you can when the decision is to miss the approach and get away from the ground.

CTL is not charted on RNP AR IAPs.

I got the feeling the OP was referring to what the FAA calls a GPS or RNAV approach. I understand the naming convention is in a state of flux right now though.

[edit: yes what check airman said]

That's as may be, but he did not specify RNP AR he wrote "RNP Approach". Your common or garden "RNAV (GNSS)" is an RNP approach these days and there are plenty such approaches with circling minima. AR approahes are titled "RNAV (RNP)", which actually means RNP AR, as opposed to just RNP. This terminology is confusing but it is what we have to get used to.FAA Factsheet RNP Approaches

Check Airman

Might depend on charting company as well, no idea there. in my route manual everything that used to be an RNAV/GNSS or similar approach is now simply a RNP approach. RNP AR would be what aterpster means, RNAV approaches are still in the manual, but those (only checked a few) are all RNAV Visual or similar kinds of approach, with an initial RNAV part and then a final visual part. Since we are not RNP AR certified yet, there are none of those in our route manual.

Check Airman

You are correct. My brain saw "AR" not my eyes.

That's correct. Missed approach procedure has two aspects lateral and vertical. Vertical starts at minimum and and lateral starts at or after MAP.