Non precision approach with CDFA (EU-OPS).
When I look at approach plates for various non-precision approaches, they often publish a DA(H) for CDFA along with the standard MDA. What I don't understand is why in many cases, the DA(H) is lower than the MDA? I would have expected the DA to be higher, in order to provide a buffer so that when a G/A is executed at DA the aircraft has room to transition to a climb without descending below MDA?
e.g EGSC - NDB DME Rwy 05 DA(H) CDFA 660 MDA 710 EGAA - RNAV (GNSS ) Rwy 07 DA(H) 520 MDA 610 |
Originally Posted by TotalBeginner
(Post 10594933)
When I look at approach plates for various non-precision approaches, they often publish a DA(H) for CDFA along with the standard MDA. What I don't understand is why in many cases, the DA(H) is lower than the MDA? I would have expected the DA to be higher, in order to provide a buffer so that when a G/A is executed at DA the aircraft has room to transition to a climb without descending below MDA?
e.g EGSC - NDB DME Rwy 05 DA(H) CDFA 660 MDA 710 EGAA - RNAV (GNSS ) Rwy 07 DA(H) 520 MDA 610 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:46. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.