PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Tech Log (https://www.pprune.org/tech-log-15/)
-   -   A320 Spoiler/autobrake logic (https://www.pprune.org/tech-log/594086-a320-spoiler-autobrake-logic.html)

applecrumble 28th Apr 2017 23:59

A320 Spoiler/autobrake logic
 
Does anyone know where the 72 knots came from?
Obviously this has some significance as it's such a random number. Does anyone have any ideas why they came up with the 72knots?

Sidestick_n_Rudder 29th Apr 2017 00:13

72kt=120kmh, maybe from there?

Amadis of Gaul 29th Apr 2017 00:17

Sounds like as good a guess as any.

peekay4 29th Apr 2017 05:56

72k = 133 km/h

applecrumble 29th Apr 2017 08:26

133 seems as random as 72?

compressor stall 30th Apr 2017 03:00

Maybe so but 133 is a Blum Integer.

applecrumble 30th Apr 2017 11:25

So some sort of mathematical/computing requirement?

peekay4 30th Apr 2017 22:03

I don't know the answer... but in engineering often these sorts of limits come from optimization calculations reflecting tradeoffs from various opposing factors.

E.g., you want the minimum wheelspin speed to be fast enough to ensure that the aircraft is "planted on the ground" (not bouncing) but not so fast that the logic prevents operation during a critical moment (e.g., while hydroplaning in the wet). So there's a tradeoff between the two.

The engineers would collect all these tradeoffs, make a min/max "cost" function, put in some constraints, plug them into a solver, and voila... the computer spits out 37 m/s or 72 kts as the optimum tradeoff.

I'm simplifying of course. I think the Boeing equivalent logic requires higher speeds, 85 or 90 kts, probably based on a different set of tradeoffs.


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:32.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.