PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Tech Log (https://www.pprune.org/tech-log-15/)
-   -   Strange autopilot behaviour, and ideas? (https://www.pprune.org/tech-log/589668-strange-autopilot-behaviour-ideas.html)

Kerosine 16th Jan 2017 16:07

Strange autopilot behaviour, and ideas?
 
A319, cruising at FL370, smooth conditions, ALT CRZ (and had been for more than 2 minutes, thus "soft altitude" hold), same problem both APs.
        Very noticeable and uncomfortable for everyone on board. We used an manual thrust setting which seemed to improve the situation.

        One other very strange item: in the following video look at the V/S versus the actual change of altitude on the tape (visible at 18 seconds and more clearly at the 1 minute mark). Related?

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9hk--9-fTlI

        Very strange! Any ideas?

        back to Boeing 16th Jan 2017 16:42

        Don't fly Airbus myself. But perhaps a mountain wave?

        EGPFlyer 16th Jan 2017 17:29

        If it was yesterday we experienced mountain waves and similar fluctuations over northern England.

        Meikleour 16th Jan 2017 17:47

        Kerosine: What you experienced was a classic standing wave encounter. Ignore any turbulence, but if you see periodic steady, off zero, VSI conditions which reverse between descent and climb, then you are "riding the wave".

        Kerosine 16th Jan 2017 18:19

        Well, it's definitely a possibility since we were approaching the Pyrenees, though I've never seen MW so pronounced at high level!

        macdo 16th Jan 2017 22:35

        Wave probably, but you often get CAT like that crossing the Atlantic. At least there was plenty of margin!

        Linktrained 17th Jan 2017 14:50

        Steve Fossett got to 50,699 ft near the Andes to hold the GLIDER altitude record in a standing wave over 10 years ago.
        LT

        hikoushi 18th Jan 2017 06:17

        Wave conditions are most prominent with an unstable layer sandwiched between 2 stable layers, one being near mountaintop level. That creates the classic "trapped" lee wave that propagates far downstream.

        Slightly more conditional instability above ridge level allows an "untrapped" wave system that has more of an upward component and less downstream. This one becomes strongest at its "cap", which is the tropopause. Being that the trop is the mother of all "elevated stable layers" this is why wave action and sometimes CAT can strengthen in the high flight levels above very strong lee wave systems.

        Seen it above thand Rockies and the Sierra Nevada in the USA many a time. Similar effects to what you describe can be encountered above wave systems at lower altitudes as well; if not near the ridge top or an inversion layer it is very possible to encounter almost totally smooth wave conditions.

        If it is an A330 try idling both engines and wave soaring on that giant wing!

        On second thought don't.

        Lantirn 18th Jan 2017 09:57

        It was a constant phenomenon or it was for some minutes?

        Kerosine 18th Jan 2017 13:58

        Thanks all for the information, always interesting to read!

        It continued for around 10 minutes before we took out the ATHR and set the power manually.

        wiggy 18th Jan 2017 15:00


        Originally Posted by Kerosine (Post 9643132)
        Well, it's definitely a possibility since we were approaching the Pyrenees, though I've never seen MW so pronounced at high level!

        The Pyrenees isn't the highest mountain range in the world (tops out at 3404metres, mount Aneto, about 100 km from chez nous) but it's worthy of attention because it's a range than can and does can generate significant wave, turbulence and spectacular lenticular cloud on a regular basis. I've certainly been in wave at FL 300 plus going over the top of the range in the vicinity of Andorra ( near the Giron waypoint).

        There's an oldish techie paper on the subject here:http://www.ann-geophys.net/15/823/19...5-823-1997.pdf

        FWIW the surface flow down here on the 15th/16th was a strong northerly, due to a low over Corsica, with a fair dump of snow on the mountains...not a nice day at ground level.

        Lantirn 18th Jan 2017 17:34

        10 minutes its too long for mountain wave i think.

        Something should be wrong with the air data. The tubing, the module, the probes i dont know. But its too long.

        FE Hoppy 18th Jan 2017 17:48

        Ive had standing waves in the middle of the south atlantic coming off the Andes so 10 minutes is not at all "too Long".

        The other thing to keep an eye on is the temperature which will cause Mach to fluctuate rapidly.

        In the good old days we would switch off the AT, set the thrust and watch the Mach roll up and down. Only adjusting thrust if we were getting close to max or min limits.

        Amadis of Gaul 18th Jan 2017 18:14


        Originally Posted by FE Hoppy (Post 9645550)
        Ive had standing waves in the middle of the south atlantic coming off the Andes so 10 minutes is not at all "too Long".

        I agree, I've had them starting a good 100 miles EAST of DEN and continue until well past GJT, so a good 20 min. One of them even threw us right in the barber pole, certainly enough to make you pay attention.

        KayPam 18th Jan 2017 18:14


        Originally Posted by Kerosine (Post 9642956)
        A319, cruising at FL370, smooth conditions, ALT CRZ (and had been for more than 2 minutes, thus "soft altitude" hold), same problem both APs.
              Very noticeable and uncomfortable for everyone on board. We used an manual thrust setting which seemed to improve the situation.

              One other very strange item: in the following video look at the V/S versus the actual change of altitude on the tape (visible at 18 seconds and more clearly at the 1 minute mark). Related?

              https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9hk--9-fTlI

              Very strange! Any ideas?

              Your best option in that sort of case is to transfer it to Airbus who will decode the DFDR/QAR/DAR data.

              Lantirn 18th Jan 2017 20:33

              Ah ok! Never noticed for so long, I had once but severe form above Alps!

              flyingchanges 19th Jan 2017 00:14


              I agree, I've had them starting a good 100 miles EAST of DEN and continue until well past GJT, so a good 20 min. One of them even threw us right in the barber pole, certainly enough to make you pay attention.
              I have been 80 north of DEN in a block altitude +/- 1,500 FPM between MCT and idle full boards.

              FlightDetent 19th Jan 2017 14:35

              Just a side note: if you see something similar in the SIM think quickly about jammed stabilizer / THS runaway. :ouch:

              Kerosine 19th Jan 2017 17:15


              There's an oldish techie paper on the subject here
              Thanks for the link, I'll be reading that tomorrow stuck in my hotel room with nothing else to do!


              The other thing to keep an eye on is the temperature which will cause Mach to fluctuate rapidly.
              Ah! This didn't occur to me at the time, so I can't confirm what the temp was doing!


              Your best option in that sort of case is to transfer it to Airbus who will decode the DFDR/QAR/DAR data.
              Might have been binned by now. I'll have a word with the guys at the base and see if it was an anomaly or a trend!


              Just a side note: if you see something similar in the SIM think quickly about jammed stabilizer / THS runaway.
              Good to know, I'll put that on my "to look up" list for this week.

              WindSheer 20th Jan 2017 19:11

              Well it snowed in Benidorm this week so slightly out of the normal for the region...


              All times are GMT. The time now is 22:35.


              Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.