PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Tech Log (https://www.pprune.org/tech-log-15/)
-   -   Airbus Flex/Boeing ATM Take offs (https://www.pprune.org/tech-log/586354-airbus-flex-boeing-atm-take-offs.html)

Captaintalkalot 29th Oct 2016 12:53

Airbus Flex/Boeing ATM Take offs
 
So I'm trying to understand this in a better way, and was wondering if anyone could point me in the right direction.

For example, I understand how both of these methods work, but does the EPR/N1% remain the same.

For example

I'm undertaking a Flex/ATM takeoff, at Temp 40c (OAT 25C) for example, on take off the N1% still rises to around 105+, which is roughly the same as TOGA, if somewhat slightly less.

Do the numbers EPR/N1% numbers remain the same no matter what take odd procedure your using, but the thrust produced is less? Or would the EPR/N1% number be less on take off if you were on Flex/ATM.

Hope this makes sense? Will try and clarify better if I need to?

CTA

FlyingStone 29th Oct 2016 13:33

Assuming normal engine status, condition etc.: N1/EPR is a direct indication of the thrust the engine is producing.

So on flex/assumed temperature takeoff, thrust produced by the engine is reduced and N1/EPR would be lower accordingly.

Gryphon 29th Oct 2016 16:53


I'm undertaking a Flex/ATM takeoff, at Temp 40c (OAT 25C) for example, on take off the N1% still rises to around 105+, which is roughly the same as TOGA, if somewhat slightly less
Check T. REF for your flat rating engine. Probably you're closer than you think. That maybe why.

BleedingAir 30th Oct 2016 08:04

N1 is reduced with the user of a higher assumed temp (737). It's not uncommon to see takeoff N1 as low as 88% or so.


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:55.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.