No, he was the Chief Test Pilot and lead pilot engineer on the project. There was no single "brain" behind the A320 - it was a long-running collaborative project, as I said above. Chief of Engineering was Bernard Ziegler. Gordon Corps was a Flight Test Engineer. Pierre Baud became Airbus Chief Test Pilot in 1978, succeeding Bernard Ziegler (A300 Chief Test Pilot) who moved over to Engineering. After the A320, Mr. Baud remained as Chief Test Pilot on several programs until 1994. The A320 first flight was piloted by Pierre Baud, and co-piloted by Bernard Ziegler. Gordon Corps was the observer. |
Originally Posted by peekay4
(Post 8992069)
Chief Test Pilot for A320 development was Pierre Baud.
Chief of Engineering was Bernard Ziegler. Baud and Ziegler were both "Veeps" (i.e. senior company vice presidents of flight division and engineering). They'd chair meetings and take the thing up on marquee flights, such as... The A320 first flight ... piloted by Pierre Baud, and co-piloted by Bernard Ziegler. Gordon Corps was the observer. |
So our friend M. Ziegler seems to be a bit of a Gallic Mr. Sutter - also head of engineering on another well known aircraft, although from what I have heard and read, Sutter was very hands on (nuts, bolts, and slide rules), often down on the floor solving engineering problems - although the story of the Sutter Twist, (the work-around that precluded a complete and very expensive redesign of the 747 wing) is admitted by Joe himself as being a group realization and effort.
In the video you linked, Mr. Corps covered the thing that most impressed me about the A320 FBW system - the autotrim function (nicely done in normal flight) extending out to an engine out scenario. Being a key engineering test pilot, I would imagine GP had not only extensive knowledge but indispensable feedback to offer on the system. I agree that it would have been nice to hear more from this gent, particularly (for me) the Anglo point of view on the history of the programme. I will delve into our other discussion when the sun is over the yardarm and am mainly responding to thank you for your links and information good sir! :ok: |
Originally Posted by vapilot2004
(Post 8993259)
So our friend M. Ziegler seems to be a bit of a Gallic Mr. Sutter...
Being a key engineering test pilot, I would imagine GP had not only extensive knowledge but indispensable feedback to offer on the system. I agree that it would have been nice to hear more from this gent, particularly (for me) the Anglo point of view on the history of the programme. One of the anecdotes I read regarding GC and the A320 was that when he encountered pilots who were somewhat sceptical of the technology, he'd invite them for a simulator ride in which he'd demonstrate the protections, explain why the technology was there to assist rather than hinder or replace and give the pilots a chance to pit their reactions against the EFCS. Which would invariably if not always end up with the systems demonstrating a significantly improved safety margin and the pilots walking away at least somewhat more convinced that the technology was sound. With 20/20 hindsight I think this was not only an apt example of understanding how pilots could best be won over, but also a very necessary counterpoint to the misguided reference to concierges which BZ became infamous for. [EDIT : Managed to dig up the reference on here - first-hand, no less - http://www.pprune.org/rumours-news/4...ml#post6117850 Partial quote:
Originally Posted by goldfish85
I thought so too. Back in the late 80s, I got into a lengthy argument with Gordon Corps, an Airbus test pilot. I suggested a contest. We would each dive at the ridge, and when I said "Now" we would each pull, me at slightly under the 3.75 g ultimate and he at 2.5 g. Whichever one missed the ridge would win.
What I didn't realize (and Airbus didn't explain well) was that he could snap the stick back to the stop and get to 2.5 g's right now. I would have to ease the yoke back and would ultimately take a few seconds. Later ALPA promoted an evaluation and found that snapping the stick right back smartly actually had the airplane bottom out somewhat higher. My time on this forum has been an invaluable learning experience in many ways, not just technical - one thing it has confirmed is that pilots do tend to be very protective of their professional pride and tend to react badly if that sense of pride is undermined. BZ seemed disinclined to take that into account, and the SNPL and press made hay with it. |
F-WWAI
Now here's what cars and planes have in common in France: WW
WW means unregistered / delivery. Recent changes to French plates now have only one W. |
1986/87/88
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 16:55. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.