Nothing. What makes you think he did not? Seat #2 had no belts attached at impact, why do people assume Captain did not take RHS? Or, for that matter his own seat, #1? How does any of the dialogue disqualify such a supposition?
|
Originally Posted by SLFinAZ
The CVR has multiple mentions of urgent "requests" to get the nose down.
At no time is there any direct mention of pitch attitude or expressed concern about the pitch attitude. |
At the end of the day the Captains decision to place the least qualified officer on the flight deck "in command" was the critical hole in the cheese (in combination with the CRM deficiencies that precluded the PM from assuming control). With an aircraft approaching the ITCZ, and with two F/Os of limited nouse, there is no way that captain should have left the flight deck. Many times have I been in a similar position. I would say, "Oh, I'm not tired, I'll chill out here....", or some such. I would only ever leave the flight deck if there was at least one 'hairy old SFO' there, and even then ONLY if there were ZERO tech or wx problems. This captain must have been barking mad to have left the flight deck for his 'rest' whilst the wx radar was a mass of red and purple. |
Of the several salient FAILS, Aileron Drag, that might be Numero Uno.
+1 BUT, not just to bird dog the FOs. It was the ship that needed tending, also. It may even have been too much for all three. We know that because it was too much for all three at the end. Unless one can pinpoint the transition from sweet to bitchy, the answers are in flow. imho. |
At no time is there any direct mention of pitch attitude or expressed concern about the pitch attitude. |
Lyman, you're right, but if the captain had never left the flight deck, he probably would have prevented the initial pitch up, and would have been 'oriented' as to the developing problem.
|
Originally Posted by Lyman
What makes you think he did not?
mbar, yes at the very end the Captain does mention pitch and commands a specific pitch attitude. However, neither the PF or the PM does despite there being at least 20 major pitch changes of 10 degrees or more with pitch varying between approx -10 to +20 in the 4:30 minutes that elapses from A/P disconnection to impact. |
Well, there would have been a relief seat switch anyways, but if the Captain had remained, he still has the chronic problem of the invisible stick, and the PF's screen snafus? Would not PF have been PF anyway?
You're on the money. Had he been in the middle seat, just for a while, I think 447 lands in Paris. He would not have tolerated the confusion and the improper division of skills/responsibilities. That he left as though the challenges were ho-hum was incredibly shortsighted. imo. Herr Spinkleman: The PF's screen was not recorded, and his apparent confusion suggests he did not have full panel, PLUS, the PNF "I will give you ATT". Why do that, if he had PITCH? Why the stick work that suggests he could not suss PITCH? |
Lyman
For goodness sake give it up! You contradict yourself continually and come up with all these weird and wonderful theories that have no basis in fact. If the PF had NO attitude indicator and STILL kept control then he would have been criminally negligent, there is NO reason nor indication that the PF did NOT have a working PFD. |
Slickster:
I find it very difficult to believe that any pilot of my 737 would sit there, for three minutes, with the yoke in his stomach, the stick shaker rattling, and the altimeter unwinding. Boeings have their faults, and all automation has its traps, but this accident does nothing to quell my Luddite fears of Airbus. The PF was confused and he clearly states that he had been pulling back for over 3 minutes. It is hard to believe neither the Captain nor the PM had any idea of these actions and didn't try to correct them. Pulling back a yoke or pulling back a side-stick equal the same action...pulling back! I cant blame the aircraft for this. Either the PM or the Captain should have clearly directed the PF on what to do, or taken the controls the second the sh#*t started hitting the fan...I would expect this type of response on any type of flight deck. |
Either the PM or the Captain should have clearly directed the PF on what to do, or taken the controls the second the sh#*t started hitting the fan...I would expect this type of response on any type of flight deck. |
"Razorray, good point - have we got too carried away with all the touchy-feely crm stuff? Logic surely says the more experienced FO who was in the seat he was used to should have taken over."
Its been reported that the PF (Bonin, the least experienced) was in the right seat and the PNF (Robert) in the left. Apparently Robert was woken up and then he swapped with Dubois while Bonin stayed in his seat. Presumably Dubois gave Bonin authority because he provided continuity when the crew changed. |
Its been reported that the PF (Bonin, the least experienced) was in the right seat and the PNF (Robert) in the left. Apparently Robert was woken up and then he swapped with Dubois while Bonin stayed in his seat. Presumably Dubois gave Bonin authority because he provided continuity when the crew changed. Continuity? Who needs continuity...the A330 was flying itself...right :confused: |
A lot of speculation. A lot of good guesses. A lot of confusion - not within the flight deck - but within this thread. :)
What are we going to do about it? Right. Let's try to get things together and wrap it up in a reasonable way. How? Take a look at the end of each and every AAR an there are the most important sentences: Probable Cause The [PPRuNe jury] determines that the probable cause of this accident was - the pilot flying's inappropriate response to ... which led to aerodynamic stall from which the airplane did not recover. - Contributing to the accident were... Who want's to give it a try? Volunteers step forward! |
The [PPRuNe jury] determines |
Nothing at all. It is just a proposal for having a more structured discussion after more than 500 postings...
|
after more than 500 postings... |
All the more time to put it all in a nutshell...
There are many very good postings all around the whole forum. They are bits and pieces of a broader picture. So why not use this source of "collective intelligence" to have a structured approach to these questions: - What was the leading cause of the accident? - What factors were just contributing to it? ...by interpreting what we know so far... It would be quite interesting to compare the structured opinion of the forum to the final AAR. |
Originally Posted by Razoray
Pulling back a yoke or pulling back a side-stick equal the same action...pulling back!
|
Class Y,
It would be quite interesting to compare the structured opinion of the forum to the final AAR. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:14. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.