PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Tech Log (https://www.pprune.org/tech-log-15/)
-   -   Cost Index 737 in your Company. (https://www.pprune.org/tech-log/399126-cost-index-737-your-company.html)

inducedrag 20th Dec 2009 10:16

In our airline we use 30

Haroon 20th Dec 2009 10:21

Same here 30 for 737-300

arba 21st Dec 2009 04:58


When you have a tailwind or the resulting arrival is too early for airfield slot for whatever reason, then you can reduce CI. Is that what you ask?
the RTA page is more likely to be used in this case , no?

DouglasFlyer 21st Dec 2009 05:08

Here's what Boeing says:

http://www.boeing.com/commercial/aer...7_article5.pdf

BOAC 21st Dec 2009 07:51


Originally Posted by arba
the RTA page is more likely to be used in this case , no?

- if you wish. Personal choice as always. I was merely trying to work out what the poster wanted in terms of CI.

Personally I have always just flown the a/c like wot we done before FMCs and not messed with RTA much, nor CI.

Good find, Douglas - on a quick look there is in fact a suggestion that the CI scale for an a/c type is fixed and it would appear that a given CI on a given type would produce the same speeds. However, as I stated earlier and abenk will see, the actual CI used its totally AIRLINE dependent and of little use to another operator (except in knowing who is going to delay you.:))

DouglasFlyer 21st Dec 2009 08:48


the actual CI used its totally AIRLINE dependent and of little use to another operator
That's exactly what Boeing says:

CI is defined as time cost (~ $/hr) divided by Fuel cost (~ cents/lb)

Both are not fixed values but variable costs which means that they must be individual to different airlines as the CI must/should be...


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:13.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.