IATA or ICAO in your logbook
 

I was wondering what international and domestic pilots use in logging destination and arrival airports in your logbooks.
I recently flew from SAEZ to KJFK Iam wondering if I shoul use the latter or EZE JFK thank you for your imputs

Being af domestic pilot sometimes operating into airfields without an ICAO identifier, I use ICAO-identifieres when available - otherwise I use the airfields name in plain text (using at thin pen).

Hi to all,
i have always loed my hours using ICAO and i am almost sure it is writen in the log book that it is the correct way.


cheers

All 3 of the above, e.g. EGCC / MAN / Manchester

You never know who's going to read it.

I use IATA or the full name myself. Don't think it matters particularly so long as you can identify the places.

I use IATA, but just beacuse it saves me a letter each time
:cool:
My logbook (jeppesen) has three examples, wichof two uses ICAO and one uses IATA, so I would say that its optional.

cheers

I use the 3-letter IATA, as it at least bears some resemlbance to the name of the airfield.

Our company uses IATA on our rosters, but ICAO on all the flight paperwork.