PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Tech Log (https://www.pprune.org/tech-log-15/)
-   -   737 wheel well drag. why aren’t more a/c door-less? (https://www.pprune.org/tech-log/111841-737-wheel-well-drag-why-aren-t-more-c-door-less.html)

jet_fumes_junkie 11th Dec 2003 23:26

737 wheel well drag. why aren’t more a/c door-less?
 
With just a less-that-smooth paintjob meaning a few-percent increase in fuel burn, how much penalty do these cause? What would have been the weight of the doors? How about exposing the gears to elements, that must cost extra in maintenance. No doubt the math comes to show that it is cheaper the way they are - so why not all aircraft? What other a/c incorporated the feature?

747FOCAL 12th Dec 2003 00:29

It's the corrosian that gets them. Boeing has thought of a Mod to add the doors. Its not the best way to do it. :)

Boss Raptor 12th Dec 2003 01:57

The weight of the doors and associated mechanics is considerable, a trade off against the disadvantages of not having them.

With my experience of the B727, with doors, and B737, without doors, I have never seen any more corrosion in the wheel bays and/or gear assemblies or deterioration of gear seals/fitments/seals/hoseing etc. on the doorless 737.

The gear and wheel bays on both 727 and 727 are covered under the CPCP - corrosion prevention and control programme which requires removal and corrosion treatment at maximum 10 years installed/or overhaul whichever comes first (in parallel with the maintenance programme hours or cycles limiter which is usually reached earlier), this covers both the gear mountings in the bays and the gear assembly itself, the wheel bays themselves are usually covered under a variety of heavy check (BMPD), CPCP, AD and structural inspection tasks.


All times are GMT. The time now is 16:42.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.