would the infra-red imaging sensors with picture to HUD or heads down display do this without the need from lots of infrastructure?

Ratboy, yes work is ongoing re fitting this function in the Tower on a HUD. The other possibility being tried at present is the GHz radar for providing a view from the cockpit. Re accidents, it may be possible in the future to provide an airport database where the relative x,y,z position of the interrogating pilot, controller or vehicle driver would enable the reception of a relative accurate picture of the field AND all other traffic.

wysu

You're getting a bit mixed up here. You can't see well in fog using your own lights -true- but that's using the lights to illuminate your surroundings rather than be the surroundings. You are no longer interested in the runway just the lights of the truck. Don't tell me you haven't hitched a tow from a high speed car that overtakes you on a foggy day.

So how does the truck get around? You have to remember that what you can safely use on an airliner doing 160 mph or along the side of a runway is entirely different to the options you have on a truck on speed-restricted taxiways. Also as you have noticed how much easier it is to drive in a city or along the illuminated sections of roads, similarly your problems fall away as you apprach the terminal complex.

I still think it's statistical - doesn't happen often enough to justify the investment.

Since you will not be entirely alone and the tow driver may not not have magical eyes you will also need ground radar, And it needs to be working!!! :( :(

Sq (Still mad at what happened in LIN)

Remember that in any subsequent runway vacation, taxi in and parking we cannot guarantee there will be any visual cues whether lit or not.

regards
wizzy

Just out of interest, what equipment is needed in the aircraft and on the ground to go further than Cat3A and do Cat3B and C?