Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Autoflight limitation.NPA

Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Autoflight limitation.NPA

Old 26th Nov 2021, 04:43
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Vladivostok
Posts: 33
Autoflight limitation.NPA

Hello everyone ! Sorry if this thread was rised before.
So A320fam AFM/FCOM limitation - AFS - FMS section states that Conventional navaid approaches may be performed in nav/app nav/final app modes with AP/ FD is used and GPS PRIMARY is available with ground based navaid or airborn equipment inoperative or not installed ,provided an operational approval is obtained..
​​​​​​I have one question about this.
Where/ how can I check this approval is obtained?( I work in RU , our regulations are mostly the same as ICAO except differences in State rules & proc-s. and my company use EASA Air ops methods for AOM)
Could someone make it clear?) Thanx!
​​​​
Sergei.a320 is offline  
Old 26th Nov 2021, 05:35
  #2 (permalink)  

Only half a speed-brake
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Commuting home
Age: 43
Posts: 3,441
It's a vague and void statement. Mere declaration of the planes capability, but no template exists for such approval.

The airline need to build it with their CAA, the sentence itself is a form of no-technical-objection from the OEM.

Some might say that it is illegal, against all airmanship, and dangerous.

Others know how to fly the 2NDB to Ulyanovsk at 5:30 a.m. in late November.
FlightDetent is offline  
Old 26th Nov 2021, 05:44
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Vladivostok
Posts: 33
Got it! You've justified my assumbtion. It seems that it's not possible to recive a Clearance for VOR appch from ATC , where VOR is unserviceable
Sergei.a320 is offline  
Old 26th Nov 2021, 05:54
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wanderlust
Posts: 3,018
The clearance needs to be from the authority and not from ATC. Technically nothing dangerous because managed approach doesn't track the VOR flies the coded track and GS. Perhaps at certain airfields there may be safety issues which need to be catered for before such approval.
vilas is offline  
Old 26th Nov 2021, 06:03
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Vladivostok
Posts: 33
"The clearance needs to be from the authority and not from ATC"
I know

Speaking about managed appch guidance you're correct, but for degraded navigation you need your refence navaid to be operative to check your lat/vert position, if this navaid or your airborne equipment is inoperative, how could you check it?
Sergei.a320 is offline  
Old 26th Nov 2021, 06:10
  #6 (permalink)  

Only half a speed-brake
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Commuting home
Age: 43
Posts: 3,441
Use the *ACTIVATE ALTN prompt from MCDU page.

Translation filter alert: Clearance / authorisation.
Any such authorization need to come from the CAA. (vilas: concept)
It's not likely the ATC would give you clearance for a NAVAID based approach that is U/S (sergei: manouevre).

You are both in agreement.
FlightDetent is offline  
Old 26th Nov 2021, 06:23
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Vladivostok
Posts: 33
I like your funny bone made me laughing
Sergei.a320 is offline  
Old 26th Nov 2021, 12:08
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wanderlust
Posts: 3,018
RNP Approaches don't have a backup nav aid what about that? Some ground work will be needed for the VOR approach regarding terrain etc before it can be cleared as good enough without reference nav aid. But not at random.
vilas is offline  
Old 26th Nov 2021, 13:19
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Vladivostok
Posts: 33
Speaking about RNP Appch , if you have problems with navigation i.e. GPS PRIMARY lost on both MCDUs , NAV FM POS DISAGREE etc. you cannot continue unless Visual contact is established. Whereas with conventional navaid appch permits you continue with TRK-FPA down to minima , and the only one source that may help you to check your path is the navaid approach based on.
Sergei.a320 is offline  
Old 26th Nov 2021, 13:33
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: Southern Hemisphere
Posts: 20
An Airbus does not normally fly a VOR approach procedure. It flies a FMS guided overlay approach. The aircraft wouldn't know or care that the VOR is working or not. This is obviously provided you have GPS Primary. The legality to fly a NDB or VOR without the station working lies with the regulator. (see FAA C300 approval). I'm not sure if OpsSpec C300 have been cancelled or superseded.

OpSpec C300 gives authorization to conduct 14 CFR part 97 non-directional
radio beacon (NDB), NDB/distance measuring equipment (DME), very high frequency (VHF)
omni-directional range (VOR), and VOR/DME instrument approaches using Area Navigation
(RNAV) as a substitute means of navigation.
T54A is offline  
Old 26th Nov 2021, 14:04
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wanderlust
Posts: 3,018
Sergei.a320

We are going round in circles. The issue was the approach nav aid not being available for the approach. So as I said it can be done with GPS accuracy subject to approval, now GPS not available so obviously GPS approach rules will apply and approach cannot be continued.
vilas is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.