Lufthansa 747's stuck at an airport they can't legally fly out of.
Thread Starter
Lufthansa 747's stuck at an airport they can't legally fly out of.
Ooops, bit of bad planning there.
https://airwaysmag.com/airlines/luft...egal-to-leave/
The first two Boeing 747s landed to Twente at the beginning of June, the last on July 24. The planes landed in Twente because it is one of the few airports where there is still room to park such large planes.
Lufthansa aircraft are now obsolete and will no longer be used in the future. However the aircraft will not be dismantled in Twente and have to leave soon.
But the six Boeing 747-400’s are too heavy to take off from this regional airport, as the infrastructure and departure procedures have not been approved for wide-body operations.
https://www.airlive.net/six-lufthans...y-to-take-off/
https://airwaysmag.com/airlines/luft...egal-to-leave/
Six Boeings 747 of the German airline Lufthansa have been temporarily parked in Twente Airport in The Netherlands since the summer.
The six Boeing 747s are at risk of not being able to leave the airport due to a change from the Human Environment and Transport Inspectorate (ILT).The first two Boeing 747s landed to Twente at the beginning of June, the last on July 24. The planes landed in Twente because it is one of the few airports where there is still room to park such large planes.
Lufthansa aircraft are now obsolete and will no longer be used in the future. However the aircraft will not be dismantled in Twente and have to leave soon.
But the six Boeing 747-400’s are too heavy to take off from this regional airport, as the infrastructure and departure procedures have not been approved for wide-body operations.
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Derbyshire, England.
Posts: 4,088
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well, if this had happened any further South East than Calais I would expect major amounts of dollars to change hands and then the law would be changed to allow their exit but as it is in the Netherlands I imagine exemptions will be issued as soon as they are requested?
Sounds rather odd... Is there an actual technical / performances issue or is it more a paperwork matter ? I'd be surprised that an empty, lightly fueled 747-400 could not safely depart from a 7900 ft runway.
In any case there seems to be an aircraft dismantling operation there (Aircraft End-of-Life Solutions(AELS)) so I guess it is mostly a commercial issue.
In any case there seems to be an aircraft dismantling operation there (Aircraft End-of-Life Solutions(AELS)) so I guess it is mostly a commercial issue.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: South East
Age: 41
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Years ago a BA 747 made an emergency diversion to a field with a short runway believing they had a hold fire.
As I recall, they send a team of engineers down to remove all the cabin fittings to get the aircraft down to a suitable TOW.
As I recall, they send a team of engineers down to remove all the cabin fittings to get the aircraft down to a suitable TOW.
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: England
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Google Maps today shows only one 747 there, and it doesn't seem to be a LH one (upper body is blue whereas the three in the airlive story are white). Where did that one go?
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Israel, Kazakhstan, Spain
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by dns
Years ago a BA 747 made an emergency diversion to a field with a short runway believing they had a hold fire.
As I recall, they send a team of engineers down to remove all the cabin fittings to get the aircraft down to a suitable TOW.
As I recall, they send a team of engineers down to remove all the cabin fittings to get the aircraft down to a suitable TOW.
BA010 BKK-LHR Divert
Originally Posted by atakacs
Sounds rather odd... Is there an actual technical / performances issue or is it more a paperwork matter ? I'd be surprised that an empty, lightly fueled 747-400 could not safely depart from a 7900 ft runway....
From the Old Kemble Aerodrome Facebook Page
Fed up trying to post a link to the above!!!! Sounded like the biggest issue (well, for ATC that is) was accessing the cockpit to sort out the paperwork ahead of departure!!!
I believe the declared distances at EGBP are TORA/TODA/ASDA 1799m on 26 (actual tarmac is 1973m but only 1799 available) and not much to bump into on the climb-out if I recall! From the pic, that got off the ground quite a way back from the end of 26.
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: UA
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How and Why would you approve a widebody like a 744 land but not takeoff ?
I think, the ground is exhibited with more violent forces upon landing rather than supporting the weight of an aircraft as it thrusts away and takes off.
But i'm not a scientist, so go ahead, execute me with your formulas and sources on the internet that prove that actually asphalt bends and splits under weight and the natural ground foundation below it will shift causing everything to rip open above.
I think, the ground is exhibited with more violent forces upon landing rather than supporting the weight of an aircraft as it thrusts away and takes off.
But i'm not a scientist, so go ahead, execute me with your formulas and sources on the internet that prove that actually asphalt bends and splits under weight and the natural ground foundation below it will shift causing everything to rip open above.
Originally Posted by OldLurker
Google Maps today shows only one 747 there, and it doesn't seem to be a LH one (upper body is blue whereas the three in the airlive story are white). Where did that one go?
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: UK
Age: 58
Posts: 2,640
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Pretty sure some 744's have departed (as well as arrived for the final time) from Kemble's 6000ft (approx) runway.
In fact, I believe the Corsair examples that have been there recently are due to leave (if they haven't already)?
In fact, I believe the Corsair examples that have been there recently are due to leave (if they haven't already)?
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: South East
Age: 41
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Aksai Oiler
That's the one.
I was cabin crew at the time and seem to remember being stuck in Budapest as they'd borrowed our 757 for the repatriation flight!
As I recall, the whole thing was an unfortunate (and very expensive!) false alarm!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Hyde, Cheshire
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by dns
That's the one.
As I recall, the whole thing was an unfortunate (and very expensive!) false alarm!
As I recall, the whole thing was an unfortunate (and very expensive!) false alarm!
Better to be down here...............
Originally Posted by Juppie902
How and Why would you approve a widebody like a 744 land but not takeoff ?
I think, the ground is exhibited with more violent forces upon landing rather than supporting the weight of an aircraft as it thrusts away and takes off.
But i'm not a scientist, so go ahead, execute me with your formulas and sources on the internet that prove that actually asphalt bends and splits under weight and the natural ground foundation below it will shift causing everything to rip open above.
I think, the ground is exhibited with more violent forces upon landing rather than supporting the weight of an aircraft as it thrusts away and takes off.
But i'm not a scientist, so go ahead, execute me with your formulas and sources on the internet that prove that actually asphalt bends and splits under weight and the natural ground foundation below it will shift causing everything to rip open above.
Additionally, the new rules say wide-bodies can still land - but only if they will be dismantled on-site and not take off again.
And are made by an agency charged with both transportation and protecting the environment. The noise-pollution difference between approach thrust and take-off thrust may play a role. Not everything is about "forces."
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: UA
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I understand they were changed after the fact - but regulations are not a lightswitch that you can toggle on/off so quickly, its like they have financial or otherwise other unknown interests that the companies invest resources and waste time dismantling them and transporting them by land - rather than make an exception to the rule.
But what do I know I'm just a tiny civilian in the rat race, your perspective may vary.
But what do I know I'm just a tiny civilian in the rat race, your perspective may vary.
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Unfortunately it is not just paperwork. The runway strip itself is suitable, but some of the area's directly connected to it are not. The lack of a turning area and the low strenght of the stopway are mentioned in the dutch article. The airport also lacks approved departure procedures.
Update: They got a one time exempt by the authorities this morning.
Update: They got a one time exempt by the authorities this morning.
Originally Posted by Wycombe
Pretty sure some 744's have departed (as well as arrived for the final time) from Kemble's 6000ft (approx) runway. In fact, I believe the Corsair examples that have been there recently are due to leave (if they haven't already)?
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: UK
Age: 58
Posts: 2,640
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The above-mentioned departure has been put on YT for our delectation.....
Looks like they gave No.3 a ground run first! - followed by a very long push-back up the active (presumably not enough space for the jumbo to turn at the upwind end)
Looks like they gave No.3 a ground run first! - followed by a very long push-back up the active (presumably not enough space for the jumbo to turn at the upwind end)
