Hydrogen fuel could revolutionize airlines - Los Angeles Times
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Everett, WA
Age: 65
Posts: 3,064
Biofuel (probably based on algae) is a far more viable long-term solution than H2 - with the added advantage that it would work with today's aircraft...
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Warwick
Posts: 168
Hydrogen fuels can be reformed into many different fuels, for Aviation weight and volume are critical, when land transport is fully non fossil fueled liquid fuels will still be used for Aviation, unless some yet unknown technology is discovered. Safety is a different matter, it is not possible to segregate passengers and compressed fuel in an airline, any fault would destroy the whole thing so either you accept that risk or forget it.
Limited range light aircraft have possibilities either Battery powered or Fuel Cell electric, wether that is within the price range of recreational pilots is another matter
Limited range light aircraft have possibilities either Battery powered or Fuel Cell electric, wether that is within the price range of recreational pilots is another matter
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Japan
Posts: 761
@tdracer, "...with a massive fuel tank in between".
Could that not be two medium-sized tanks, or even four little 'uns? Granted that you waste space between the cylinders, and you face interchangeability problems.
Could that not be two medium-sized tanks, or even four little 'uns? Granted that you waste space between the cylinders, and you face interchangeability problems.
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 1,974
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: England
Age: 62
Posts: 276
By energy dense, I'm referring to the potential energy per kg compared to Jet A-1, this is not related to volume.
Relative energy densities
Relative energy densities
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Warwick
Posts: 168
By energy dense, I'm referring to the potential energy per kg compared to Jet A-1, this is not related to volume.
Relative energy densities
Relative energy densities
But then there would be no point, you could have used the electricity directly, or store it in batteries, current technology is moving that way, not hydrogen. We need a quantum leap in technology for hydrogen to be more efficient.
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: attitude is nominal
Posts: 1,194
We need a quantum leap in battery technology before any big commercial airplane can fly with electrical battery power. This view is undisputed within the industry and this is the reason why big manufacturers look elsewhere likte at hydrogen.
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Warwick
Posts: 168
Battery power is out for large long range jets, it’s going to be hydrogen based that’s for sure but not compressed gas, the technology we have now has been around for many decades we need something new, that’s for batteries as well as hydrogen
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: uk
Posts: 851
Biofuel (probably based on algae) is a far more viable long-term solution than H2 - with the added advantage that it would work with today's aircraft...
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Great Britain
Posts: 7
One major advantage that hydrogen has over batteries is that you are not carrying the full weight of the reactants around with you. You carry the hydrogen (which gets consumed throughout the flight) but you don’t need to carry the oxygen as it is in the air through which you fly. A battery must carry all reactants throughout the flight and what’s more, will weigh just as much on landing.
Over a decade ago I was lectured on the exciting possibility of storing hydrogen in a “carbon sponge” which went some way to alleviating the fears of explosion of hydrogen tanks in a car accident. I haven’t since heard much on this technology!
Over a decade ago I was lectured on the exciting possibility of storing hydrogen in a “carbon sponge” which went some way to alleviating the fears of explosion of hydrogen tanks in a car accident. I haven’t since heard much on this technology!
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Age: 55
Posts: 2,904
About 33 minutes into this video.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_6SxcO-fHEU
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Everett, WA
Age: 65
Posts: 3,064
Something I didn't mention previously - liquid H2 has another problem: The cryogenic temperatures involved are very hard on the materials used. This means a massive maintenance burden to keep the system working properly and safely. Rocket engines and the associated hardware (pumps, etc.) only operate for minutes, then are either discarded or rebuilt before they are used again - not a practical solution for an aircraft that is expected to operate eight or more hours a day, every day, for years...
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Manchester
Age: 42
Posts: 611
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Everett, WA
Age: 65
Posts: 3,064
However if you manufacture the methane using CO2 from the atmosphere, it can be carbon neutral (depending on the source of the energy used in the process). Same basic theory as biofuels.
Being 'carbon neutral' doesn't have to mean moving away from hydrocarbon fuels - it just means you need to re-think how you source them.
Given the inefficiencies inherent in using H2 as fuel, I remain far from convinced it's a better solution than 'manufacturing' hydrocarbon fuels.
Being 'carbon neutral' doesn't have to mean moving away from hydrocarbon fuels - it just means you need to re-think how you source them.
Given the inefficiencies inherent in using H2 as fuel, I remain far from convinced it's a better solution than 'manufacturing' hydrocarbon fuels.
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Warwick
Posts: 168
Whatever the fuel of the future for air transport is it wont be liquid hydrogen, far too dangerous, technically difficult and expensive. Maybe Ethanol or some other liquid synthetic fuel but that is way in the future, as land transport moves to electric there will be ample fossil fuel for aviation for at least 50 yrs and probably way into the next century.
Until there is a quantum leap in hydrogen technology it will remain the holy grail of energy.
Until there is a quantum leap in hydrogen technology it will remain the holy grail of energy.