Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Britten-Norman Pilotless Planes

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Britten-Norman Pilotless Planes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Oct 2020, 07:01
  #1 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,378
Received 1,579 Likes on 717 Posts
Britten-Norman Pilotless Planes

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/b...2030-rw3mw3blb

Brace yourself for pilotless planes by 2030

Pilotless passenger aircraft will take to the skies within a decade under plans drawn up by a British manufacturer to cut the cost of flights.

Britten-Norman, based on the Isle of Wight, said yesterday that it planned to introduce single-pilot planes with an “autonomous co-pilot” by 2025. It said that the shift to fully pilotless planes could be achieved by the end of the decade, giving operators the choice to move between “uncrewed and piloted” flights as required.....

Yesterday, Britten-Norman, the sole independent commercial aircraft manufacturer in the UK, announced that it had signed a deal with Blue Bear, a British autonomous flight specialist, to develop the technology.

The two companies will work to automate Britten-Norman’s Islander, a twin-engine utility aircraft which is used for passenger flights, cargo and search-and-rescue operations. The project is due to be launched this month.

The plane, which can carry up to nine passengers, and has a short take-off and landing capability, operates on commercial routes between Scottish islands.

The team behind the project said: “Eventually the system will allow the Islander to take off, fly and land without any human input but the first milestone will be an automated co-pilot which can advise its human operator.”

Passenger jets have been flying on autopilot for around 50 years and large drones piloted from the ground are common in the military. However, pilotless passenger planes are not permitted. The technology would ultimately have to be approved by regulators.

Britten-Norman already produces aircraft that are certified for single pilot flights but some operators elect to, or must, operate with a second safety pilot. The company said that the ultimate goal was optional full automation which “should be realised within this decade”.

It said regional air transport was often “underdeveloped and often forced to rely on subsidy. This is because regional air transport can struggle to be economically sustainable due to high operating and maintenance costs,” it said. “Regional air transport will have to incorporate zero carbon and autonomous technology to make operations affordable and scalable.”......
ORAC is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2020, 07:29
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: ex EGNM, now NZRO
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BAE were using Jetstreams pre-Gulf War 2, developing them as surveillance drones
Anti Skid On is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2020, 07:37
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: England
Posts: 399
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by ORAC
single-pilot planes with an “autonomous co-pilot”
CRM could be very interesting.
OldLurker is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2020, 07:42
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,253
Received 195 Likes on 90 Posts
Yawn here we go again. Can you keep us appraised when the mighty Islander has done a fully autonomous assymetric takeoff and a two engine landing in 30 kts of crosswind. When it can do that 100 times out of 100 then I might be interested.
Lookleft is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2020, 08:11
  #5 (permalink)  
Rie
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Wan Chai
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If memory serves me correctly at least the computer only has to remember 65kts for everything...
Rie is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2020, 08:15
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Cayley's County - Yorkshire
Posts: 292
Received 40 Likes on 15 Posts
When it can do that 100 times out of 100
Right idea, but any regulator is going to start with something more like 100,000 times out of 100,000 and ramp it up from there.
CAEBr is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2020, 08:32
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Malvern, UK
Posts: 425
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Lookleft
Yawn here we go again. Can you keep us appraised when the mighty Islander has done a fully autonomous assymetric takeoff and a two engine landing in 30 kts of crosswind. When it can do that 100 times out of 100 then I might be interested.
The control law has never been the issue for autonomous flight. There is no reason that an autopilot cannot consistently carry out an on-limits crosswind landing as well as a top class pilot on the top of their game.
The complexity comes from interfacing to, and acting upon every conceivable problem from every system involved in the flight. And that includes external "systems" such as ATC.

Crosswind landing with a fully functional aircraft? I am fine with that.
Carrying out all the correct procedures to deal with an engine fire - not so sure.
Dont Hang Up is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2020, 08:58
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Solihull
Age: 38
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ORAC
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/b...2030-rw3mw3blb

Brace yourself for pilotless planes by 2030

It said regional air transport was often “underdeveloped and often forced to rely on subsidy. This is because regional air transport can struggle to be economically sustainable due to high operating and maintenance costs,”
Perhaps I'm being daft, but i don't understand how removing one (or both) pilots will have any real impact on the overall operating and maintenance costs. What's the pilots salary as a percentage of the overall cost of operating flights? Or do the extra tea and biscuits they need to carry push them over the edge on profitability? It's not like you can remove one of the engines because there isnt a pilot on board...!

The only exception to the above is it, rather than having a cockpit at the front you can actually have 3 or 4 rows of extra seats. Perhaps charging a premium for a nice view (i'd pay extra for that!!). But wouldnt there be a load of wasted space as at some point the fuselage needs to taper down to a point...?
LessThanSte is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2020, 09:04
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Dubai - sand land.
Age: 55
Posts: 2,831
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How things have changed! I managed to fly both Islanders and Trislanders without advice from an ‘autonomous co-pilot’🤔😳
White Knight is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2020, 09:13
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,073
Received 66 Likes on 40 Posts
Large numbers of old Antonov An-2s are converted to drones and used in a certain recent conflict to one way carry explosives or to trigger enemy air defences to activate.This might be all that is feasible today.

https://www.overtdefense.com/2020/10...s-into-drones/
Less Hair is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2020, 09:22
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Auckland, NZ
Age: 79
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dont Hang Up
Crosswind landing with a fully functional aircraft? I am fine with that.
Carrying out all the correct procedures to deal with an engine fire - not so sure.
Not a pilot, but can I ask why you wouldn't trust automation to carry out correct procedures in any situation? I would have thought that the problems would come in the situations where there are no pre-defined correct procedures, perhaps where the only choice is the lesser of two evils, or in those situations where current automation gives up and hands the aeroplane back to the pilot. Check-lists and SOPs, I gather, are responsible for a lot of the improvement in safety; is there a way in which even SOPs have to be performed with human-only nuance? (A real question.)
FlightlessParrot is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2020, 09:32
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1998
Location: Mesopotamos
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks to Covid-19 there are already plenty of pilotless planes.

Yet another puff piece. Meanwhile in my neck of the woods, a locomotive driver discovered his computer controlled sand dispensing system failed completely during wet and greasy track conditions yet he struggled to pull the train to a stop after going through two uncleared level crossings and a curve well above the track's safety speed - with only minor injuries to a passenger.
cattletruck is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2020, 09:57
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: italy
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It has taken boeing like a year just to "fix" a program and a few other issues in an airplane which is handled by humans and you're saying that there will be pilotless ( which means more complications) in less than 10 years, yeep, sounds accurate.
WhatShortage is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2020, 10:28
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: uk
Posts: 913
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
IMHO the general public won't accept the idea of a pilotless passenger flight until the successful adoption and proving of autonomous cars which will normailise the idea of automation in their minds.
The BN idea above is just a glorified autopilot on an a/c that is really single pilot anyway. No news here, move on...
macdo is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2020, 11:28
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Lander, WY, USA
Posts: 286
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Lookleft
Yawn here we go again. Can you keep us appraised when the mighty Islander has done a fully autonomous assymetric takeoff and a two engine landing in 30 kts of crosswind. When it can do that 100 times out of 100 then I might be interested.
......all that, and, onto a beach in the Outer Hebrides.
340drvr is online now  
Old 7th Oct 2020, 11:52
  #16 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Ontario, Canada
Age: 63
Posts: 5,613
Received 60 Likes on 43 Posts
Wasn't it John Donne who wrote that No Man is an Island(er)?
Pilot DAR is online now  
Old 7th Oct 2020, 13:50
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Sweden
Age: 56
Posts: 224
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Lookleft
Yawn here we go again. Can you keep us appraised when the mighty Islander has done a fully autonomous assymetric takeoff and a two engine landing in 30 kts of crosswind. When it can do that 100 times out of 100 then I might be interested.
Not a problem. ”George” will be your PIC and you’ll hear ”Your controlls” every time George think its hard.
AAKEE is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2020, 15:23
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Earth
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LessThanSte;

About 20% of airlines costs on pilots.
AOGspanner is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2020, 17:36
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Wellington,NZ
Age: 66
Posts: 1,676
Received 10 Likes on 4 Posts
Such negativity.
The proposal will prevent about 50 cases of hearing loss, worldwide, every year!
Tarq57 is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2020, 18:14
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Kelowna Wine Country
Posts: 509
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 8 Posts
Seriously, Pilots cost 20% of airline costs?

Amortisation of aircraft and aviation equipment,
Cabin crew
Ground crew
Servicing and spares
Airport fees
Insurance
Head office personnel, management
Head office overhead
Fuel, oil etc
Agency commisions
Advertising

Edit: And taxes

I am sure this is not an exhaustive list, and I keep hearing on here how poorly LOCO pilots and entry level 1st officers are paid and how they now have to pay for their own upgrades.

ChrisVJ is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.