Drag of a seized jet engine compared to windmilling
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: VA
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Higher drag with a seized engine.
All discussion of how the windmilling fan is extracting energy and thus must be creating more drag ignores the fact that a seized engine is essentially a giant blunt body with all kinds of intake spillage going on. That effect is way more than the windmilling. (All the windmilling needs to do is overcome the bearing drag once the engine is stabilized, which is not that big)
Am aware of an incident where significant engine damage caused one of a twin to seize. Max attainable altitude dropped from the theoretical ~25kft for a normal OEI case to below 15kft.
All discussion of how the windmilling fan is extracting energy and thus must be creating more drag ignores the fact that a seized engine is essentially a giant blunt body with all kinds of intake spillage going on. That effect is way more than the windmilling. (All the windmilling needs to do is overcome the bearing drag once the engine is stabilized, which is not that big)
Am aware of an incident where significant engine damage caused one of a twin to seize. Max attainable altitude dropped from the theoretical ~25kft for a normal OEI case to below 15kft.
its£5perworddammit
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: the foxhole
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From the text referenced above - locked rotor is not necessarly less drag than windmilling - it depends on the bypass ratio. In straight jets and low bypass fans the losses from the increased flow through the core more than offsets the spillage. The crossover point was mentioned to be around 5:1 bypass - right around where the last gen turbofans live.
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: French Alps
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From the text referenced above - locked rotor is not necessarly less drag than windmilling - it depends on the bypass ratio. In straight jets and low bypass fans the losses from the increased flow through the core more than offsets the spillage. The crossover point was mentioned to be around 5:1 bypass - right around where the last gen turbofans live.
http://www.peter2000.co.uk/aviation/misc/prop.pdf
Last edited by Fly Aiprt; 1st Nov 2019 at 19:37.
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: VA
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From the text referenced above - locked rotor is not necessarly less drag than windmilling - it depends on the bypass ratio. In straight jets and low bypass fans the losses from the increased flow through the core more than offsets the spillage. The crossover point was mentioned to be around 5:1 bypass - right around where the last gen turbofans live.
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Seattle Area
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From the text referenced above - locked rotor is not necessarly less drag than windmilling - it depends on the bypass ratio. In straight jets and low bypass fans the losses from the increased flow through the core more than offsets the spillage. The crossover point was mentioned to be around 5:1 bypass - right around where the last gen turbofans live.
Internal drag on a windmilling pure jet would be much higher than the internal drag of a windmilling high bypass engine of the same diameter. For a given external nacelle geometry at a given spillage flow and given flight condition, the external drag is constant and has nothing directly to do with bypass ratio. Internal drag varies with significantly with bypass ratio. The higher the bypass ratio of a windmilling engine of a given fan diameter, the lower the internal drag because more of the air only has to go through a fan and EGVs and not through a whole engine core. With a duct blocked at the fan face, bypass ratio doesn't matter at all because all the air is being spilled. With a locked fan passing far less air through the duct than a windmilling engine, bypass ratio has less of an effect than it does for a windmilling engine. So expressing a windmilling nacelle drag versus locked rotor nacelle drag crossover point purely in terms of bypass ratio doesn't appear to me to make sense. I suspect absolute fan and nacelle diameter also has a significant effect due to the fan area being proportional to the square of diameter and the nacelle outer circumference being directly proportional to the diameter, with larger diameter engines having a greater overall drag difference between the windmilling and locked rotor configurations.
My recollection from an airplane program involving a very large twin with 6:1 bypass ratio engines was that the nacelles were analytically shown to have quite a bit higher overall drag with a locked fan rotor versus a windmilling rotor.
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Another Planet.
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Going Down.
At 20W over the wet bits I don’t think I’d be trying to do the maths on this one, thoughtful formulae kindly provided from this thread!
I’d be hoping all the ETOPS fiction dreamt up by the airlines and eagerly certified by the xAAs actually worked in practice?
And if it actually had seized, was it still on the pylon or were the terrified pax filming the remains of fuel, electrics, hydraulics and pneumatics systems on their mobile phones hoping loved ones would see their recovered last filming efforts?
I’m still waiting for an authoritative answer to the likelihood of a “dry” HP fuel pump overheating snd causing a potential engine fire.
As Monty Python used to say when a sketch had run out of steam........”This sketch is silly, stop it at once!”.
I’d be hoping all the ETOPS fiction dreamt up by the airlines and eagerly certified by the xAAs actually worked in practice?
And if it actually had seized, was it still on the pylon or were the terrified pax filming the remains of fuel, electrics, hydraulics and pneumatics systems on their mobile phones hoping loved ones would see their recovered last filming efforts?
I’m still waiting for an authoritative answer to the likelihood of a “dry” HP fuel pump overheating snd causing a potential engine fire.
As Monty Python used to say when a sketch had run out of steam........”This sketch is silly, stop it at once!”.
..... or were the terrified pax filming the remains of fuel, electrics, hydraulics and pneumatics systems on their mobile phones hoping loved ones would see their recovered last filming efforts?
Last edited by Winemaker; 4th Nov 2019 at 00:45. Reason: language
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Amongst the Gum Tree's
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
im not sure what to say... everything is in that text to arrive at a sound conclusion and I’m sceptical of the references that arrive at the differing conclusion that the windmilling case is more efficient than the locked case.
From the referenced text, it is fairly evident that it’s not so much what happens with the fan (for turbofans), but what happens in the core
Excluding the aerodynamic implications of a windmilling core/fan vs a locked core (as applied to single or dual spool), in practical terms it would be best to lock the core of a malfunctioned powerplant to alleviate risk of <further> damage to the powerplant and/or it’s accessories.
Torque imposed by the rotor locking up tears the engine off.
Best not to get into torque and locked rotors and just stick to aero loads in this thread. Much of what has just been posted is wrong in analogy. But hey, it's a free for all so just take it where you want 
Besides, remember what was believed to have caused the engine seizure - blue ice ingestion. It's pretty hard to envision a scenario where a big chunk of blue ice ends up going through the center inlet...
