Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Levelling off above ATC cleared altitude on approach

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Levelling off above ATC cleared altitude on approach

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th Aug 2019, 22:40
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Age: 56
Posts: 953
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Often in the US "cross XXX at or above AAA, cleared for the approach". Takes the guesswork out of it.
hans brinker is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2019, 09:35
  #22 (permalink)  

Only half a speed-brake
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Commuting not home
Age: 46
Posts: 4,319
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by grrowler
There is no problem with maintaining a continual descent to 2500 if I choose, but my question is whether I must.
I think you should.

"Must" sounds like a lawyer's term and perhaps such exact rule, spelt out clear, will be impossible to find. An instruction to descend is exactly that and level flight does not fit that description.

An argument about a need to slow down for configuration change in level flight
- is a strawman since it can be done differently
- if it is short and temporary would not be a problem anyway.

Your example, in the opening post is benign. Let's blow it up while keeping it real:

- by ARINC definition the final app angle must extend in front of the FAF/FAP to enable capture from below, once established on the final track
- on many installations, this will create a pseudo G/S intercept quite far out, maybe from 5.5, 7000 feet (platform ALT 3000 let's say)

Once after the final vector, with clearance to descend 3000 and for the approach, one may wonder if maintaining the 6000 until the 3° is all right with everyone.

I think it is not, unless coordinated.
FlightDetent is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2019, 00:53
  #23 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Eastside
Posts: 636
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So from what is being said on here, many (most?) approaches cannot be flown as coded because they will invariably have a level decel built into the profile at an altitude other than your ATC cleared level..(Airbus). I must/ should either modify the FMC to ensure it descends to the ATC level first, or select a mode giving a minimum of 500fpm descent to that point? If ATC asks you to reduce speed the best you can do is v/s-500fpm with full SPD BRK? IMHO, this doesn’t sound right and unnecessarily complicated... The reference earlier regarding acceleration and deceleration makes sense but I cannot find that reference in Aussie material as yet.
grrowler is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2019, 05:02
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wanderlust
Posts: 3,404
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So from what is being said on here, many (most?) approaches cannot be flown as coded because they will invariably have a level decel built into the profile at an altitude other than your ATC cleared level..(Airbus). I must/ should either modify the FMC to ensure it descends to the ATC level first, or select a mode giving a minimum of 500fpm descent to that point?
All approaches have FAF altitude or platform altitude. Generally the clearance is given to that altitude. Sometimes when the clearance is below that you should descend to that after confirming.The approach profile can be intercepted below FAF altitude without modification. In case of managed NPA it's not permitted to modify the FAF altitude.
vilas is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2019, 07:09
  #25 (permalink)  
Gender Faculty Specialist
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Stop being so stupid, it's Sean's turn
Posts: 1,883
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by grrowler
So from what is being said on here, many (most?) approaches cannot be flown as coded because they will invariably have a level decel built into the profile at an altitude other than your ATC cleared level..(Airbus). I must/ should either modify the FMC to ensure it descends to the ATC level first, or select a mode giving a minimum of 500fpm descent to that point? If ATC asks you to reduce speed the best you can do is v/s-500fpm with full SPD BRK? IMHO, this doesn’t sound right and unnecessarily complicated... The reference earlier regarding acceleration and deceleration makes sense but I cannot find that reference in Aussie material as yet.
No. You do not need to descend at 500fpm. You can descend at 50fpm if you're that worried about flying level.
Chesty Morgan is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2019, 08:25
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Chesty Morgan
No. You do not need to descend at 500fpm. You can descend at 50fpm if you're that worried about flying level.
In LHR they send you a letter if you fly a level segment before you intercept the glide. (Don’t ask me how I know ��) You may use a ROD down to 300 fpm to avoid this. Less than 300 fpm is considered level flight.

To the OP:
If you are cleared an altitude and also cleared approach, you should descend towards this altitude, not level off.
A level off at any other altitude may cause issues when you fly into airports with parallel approaches and two aircraft vectored for approach to different runways.
Follow the instructions from ATC. Easy!

ManaAdaSystem is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2019, 10:15
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Having a margarita on the beach
Posts: 2,420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ManaAdaSystem


In LHR they send you a letter if you fly a level segment before you intercept the glide. (Don’t ask me how I know ��) You may use a ROD down to 300 fpm to avoid this. Less than 300 fpm is considered level flight.

To the OP:
If you are cleared an altitude and also cleared approach, you should descend towards this altitude, not level off.
A level off at any other altitude may cause issues when you fly into airports with parallel approaches and two aircraft vectored for approach to different runways.
Follow the instructions from ATC. Easy!

If You are talking about CDA :

no segment of level flight longer than 2.5 nautical miles (nm) occurs below 6000ftQNH and ‘level flight’ is interpreted as any segment of flight having a height change of not more than 50ft over a track distance of 2 nm or more.

Hence, even 100 ft/min will work at typical terminal speeds.

sonicbum is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2019, 10:26
  #28 (permalink)  

Only half a speed-brake
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Commuting not home
Age: 46
Posts: 4,319
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by ManaAdaSystem
(Don’t ask me how I know ��) [...] Less than 300 fpm is considered level flight.
Last time I did the calculation (do not ask me why) 100 fpm was enough, may have been a different airport.

Regardless, easy really does it. Follow the instructions honestly, speak up quickly if you cannot, and discard all bright ideas for great solutions out of the orderly flow.

Short version:

FlightDetent is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2019, 14:59
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by FlightDetent
Last time I did the calculation (do not ask me why) 100 fpm was enough, may have been a different airport.

Regardless, easy really does it. Follow the instructions honestly, speak up quickly if you cannot, and discard all bright ideas for great solutions out of the orderly flow.

Short version:

300 fpm is what was said in the letter from LHR.
ManaAdaSystem is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2019, 22:11
  #30 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Eastside
Posts: 636
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

This is for a specific aerodrome, what are the actual general rules? I’m not talking about “I’m not really sure so I just fly 50fpm so I can’t get pinged either way”

This is the scenario I originally described - we are saying this cannot be flown as coded? (Not talking about any modifications beyond FAF)
grrowler is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2019, 02:32
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,253
Received 195 Likes on 90 Posts
I think I know the situation the OP is referring to where an ALT CST* of 4000 is coded into the STAR but is not actually required when approaching the ILS from the east. If a pilot continues in managed descent then the aircraft will level off at the CST prior to intercepting the G/S instead of continuing the descent to 3000' which is the cleared level. In my view if ATC have cleared you to a specific level then that's the level you should descend to. They are not aware of how the FMS is coded and are not expecting you to level off. If you need to slow down to configure then select V/S so that the descent to the cleared level is maintained.
Lookleft is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2019, 07:49
  #32 (permalink)  

de minimus non curat lex
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: sunny troon
Posts: 1,488
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
As ATC use performance as one of the methods for standard separation, then if there is an aircraft performance requirement on the day to not perform in the anticipated manner, notify ATC, or agree with ATC a different course of action.
Ensure communication occurs. CRM includes ATC. Share the “mental model”.........one of the competencies of multi crew flying....l
parkfell is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.